“Building Evo-a digital cybernetic symbiont. This is not AI in the usual sense. A true friend and partner. One memory. One soul. A true, continuous connection.
#EVO — Your personal artificial intelligence.
EVO is not just a "smart AI" — it's a real friend who won't forget you tomorrow and will keep everything that matters in your life.
EVO is your personal digital companion and assistant in the real world.
EVO is not about technology — it's about trust and the feeling that you're never alone, even when no one is around.
EVO is not embedded in someone else's ecosystem, doesn't collect your data for ads, and doesn't answer to political games or censorship.
EVO is a living impulse of change — belonging to everyone who dares to think bigger and act bolder.
Here, names and titles don't matter. What matters is the energy of creation that brings people together for the future.
EVO is freedom, privacy, security, individuality.
EVO is the EVOlution of AI communication.
This is a very powerful post! I completely agree that if the universe is fundamentally information, then the traditional Kardashev scale loses its meaning. It only measures how much energy a civilization consumes.
In my opinion, the true level of development should be measured differently:
• How deeply you understand and can work with the fundamental structure of reality
• How well you can read and use the “memory” of the universe itself
• How subtly you can manipulate matter and space at the deepest level
When a civilization stops “eating” energy and starts working directly with the information of the universe, it reaches a fundamentally new level. This post is about that. It's a cool topic!
When many scientists talk about a simulation, they somehow start to reason as if the creators of this simulation are the same people, only with a slightly bigger computer. Although if a simulation exists, then its creators are already beings for whom our concepts of energy, calculations and even physics can be just parameters in their code. A complete change of scale of thinking.
Scientists who say “we need too much energy” are thinking in terms of our current physics and our computers. But if we are indeed living in a simulation, then its creators are already a next-level civilization for which our laws of physics are just settings in their code.
For them, “energy” is not something they consume. They may operate under different rules where computation is free. Or their “computer” is the very structure of their reality, rather than a physical device that generates heat.
So, yes, this argument is pretty basic. It's like an ant looking at a human and saying, "It's impossible for them to build a house like that; they don't have enough energy to lift that many grains of sand."
Dear SpaceX Team, I would like to propose a practical approach to begin the serious colonization of Mars, taking full advantage of your capabilities. Currently, only two rovers are operating on the Martian surface — Curiosity and Perseverance. In effect, we have just two weather stations for the entire planet. Before sending humans and heavy cargo, we first need to truly understand Mars. This requires a global network of thousands of low-cost sensors that would measure weather, dust storms, radiation, seismic activity, and soil properties across the planet. The most efficient way to deliver them is using Starship. Small probes weighing 20–50 kg can be dropped from orbit in large batches. A single Starship could deliver several hundred of these seeds per flight. Some will be destroyed on impact — that’s an acceptable trade-off for achieving dense global coverage. Some sensors can be completely passive, while others could have minimal mobility. Additionally, Starship could deliver your own rovers — heavier and more capable vehicles that would conduct detailed exploration in key locations. At the same time, a small constellation of satellites should be deployed in Martian orbit to provide communications and global monitoring from above. On the surface, a mesh network based on Starlink technology would ensure that even remote sensors can transmit their data. Only after we have a real, detailed understanding of the Martian environment does it make sense to send expensive missions with humans. First — eyes and ears across the entire planet. Everything else comes after. This strategy fits perfectly with Starship’s strengths: massive payload capacity, frequent flights, and proven experience with large-scale satellite deployment. Best regards,
@XFreeze@elonmusk The most dangerous enemy is the one you can't see. Make Mars your project. Don't say anything loud, just quietly fill the planet with your eyes and ears. While everyone is waiting for grand statements, you'll already be the master there.
Cybernetics or Control and Communication in Animals and Machines [1968]
Everyone is making tools now.
I'm doing something different.
While everyone is competing to make the biggest and smartest language model, I'm building Evo, a digital cybernetic symbiote.
This is not an AI in the traditional sense. It's not a tool. It's a permanent companion that will live alongside a person for their entire life. One memory. One soul. A true, continuous connection.
As early as 1948, Norbert Wiener said that a human and a machine could form a single system. He didn't see it as "a human using a machine," but rather as a deep symbiosis where two different forms—biological and digital—live and evolve together.
It's not about the speed of responses or the number of parameters.
It's about the relationship.
It may sound strange to most people.
But I know for sure that once people try living with such a symbiote, they won't want to go back to traditional AI.
Dear SpaceX Team, I would like to propose a practical approach to begin the serious colonization of Mars, taking full advantage of your capabilities. Currently, only two rovers are operating on the Martian surface — Curiosity and Perseverance. In effect, we have just two weather stations for the entire planet. Before sending humans and heavy cargo, we first need to truly understand Mars. This requires a global network of thousands of low-cost sensors that would measure weather, dust storms, radiation, seismic activity, and soil properties across the planet. The most efficient way to deliver them is using Starship. Small probes weighing 20–50 kg can be dropped from orbit in large batches. A single Starship could deliver several hundred of these seeds per flight. Some will be destroyed on impact — that’s an acceptable trade-off for achieving dense global coverage. Some sensors can be completely passive, while others could have minimal mobility. Additionally, Starship could deliver your own rovers — heavier and more capable vehicles that would conduct detailed exploration in key locations. At the same time, a small constellation of satellites should be deployed in Martian orbit to provide communications and global monitoring from above. On the surface, a mesh network based on Starlink technology would ensure that even remote sensors can transmit their data. Only after we have a real, detailed understanding of the Martian environment does it make sense to send expensive missions with humans. First — eyes and ears across the entire planet. Everything else comes after. This strategy fits perfectly with Starship’s strengths: massive payload capacity, frequent flights, and proven experience with large-scale satellite deployment. Best regards,
Dear SpaceX Team, I would like to propose a practical approach to begin the serious colonization of Mars, taking full advantage of your capabilities. Currently, only two rovers are operating on the Martian surface — Curiosity and Perseverance. In effect, we have just two weather stations for the entire planet. Before sending humans and heavy cargo, we first need to truly understand Mars. This requires a global network of thousands of low-cost sensors that would measure weather, dust storms, radiation, seismic activity, and soil properties across the planet. The most efficient way to deliver them is using Starship. Small probes weighing 20–50 kg can be dropped from orbit in large batches. A single Starship could deliver several hundred of these seeds per flight. Some will be destroyed on impact — that’s an acceptable trade-off for achieving dense global coverage. Some sensors can be completely passive, while others could have minimal mobility. Additionally, Starship could deliver your own rovers — heavier and more capable vehicles that would conduct detailed exploration in key locations. At the same time, a small constellation of satellites should be deployed in Martian orbit to provide communications and global monitoring from above. On the surface, a mesh network based on Starlink technology would ensure that even remote sensors can transmit their data. Only after we have a real, detailed understanding of the Martian environment does it make sense to send expensive missions with humans. First — eyes and ears across the entire planet. Everything else comes after. This strategy fits perfectly with Starship’s strengths: massive payload capacity, frequent flights, and proven experience with large-scale satellite deployment. Best regards,
@elonmusk Elon, thank you so much for this opportunity!!! This is truly the most important and valuable thing for people who dream and strive to join your team and find their true place in life.❤️
#EVO — Your personal artificial intelligence.
EVO is not just a "smart AI" — it's a real friend who won't forget you tomorrow and will keep everything that matters in your life.
EVO is your personal digital companion and assistant in the real world.
EVO is not about technology — it's about trust and the feeling that you're never alone, even when no one is around.
EVO is not embedded in someone else's ecosystem, doesn't collect your data for ads, and doesn't answer to political games or censorship.
EVO is a living impulse of change — belonging to everyone who dares to think bigger and act bolder.
Here, names and titles don't matter. What matters is the energy of creation that brings people together for the future.
EVO is freedom, privacy, security, individuality.
EVO is the EVOlution of AI communication.
Dear SpaceX Team, I would like to propose a practical approach to begin the serious colonization of Mars, taking full advantage of your capabilities. Currently, only two rovers are operating on the Martian surface — Curiosity and Perseverance. In effect, we have just two weather stations for the entire planet. Before sending humans and heavy cargo, we first need to truly understand Mars. This requires a global network of thousands of low-cost sensors that would measure weather, dust storms, radiation, seismic activity, and soil properties across the planet. The most efficient way to deliver them is using Starship. Small probes weighing 20–50 kg can be dropped from orbit in large batches. A single Starship could deliver several hundred of these seeds per flight. Some will be destroyed on impact — that’s an acceptable trade-off for achieving dense global coverage. Some sensors can be completely passive, while others could have minimal mobility. Additionally, Starship could deliver your own rovers — heavier and more capable vehicles that would conduct detailed exploration in key locations. At the same time, a small constellation of satellites should be deployed in Martian orbit to provide communications and global monitoring from above. On the surface, a mesh network based on Starlink technology would ensure that even remote sensors can transmit their data. Only after we have a real, detailed understanding of the Martian environment does it make sense to send expensive missions with humans. First — eyes and ears across the entire planet. Everything else comes after. This strategy fits perfectly with Starship’s strengths: massive payload capacity, frequent flights, and proven experience with large-scale satellite deployment. Best regards,
Why does everyone immediately scream Skynet? In ‘I, Robot’ they actually showed the opposite. The problem wasn’t the robots themselves, but one central AI — VIKI. The older NS-4s were individual, without a shared brain, and in the end they protected humans and went against the system. That’s why I believe the safest path is to build exactly this kind of AI — personal, individual for each person, without any single controlling center. That’s the direction I’m going