executive tramp

[executive tramp @executive_tramp]

@GBNEWS ‘Prince Harry’s popularity plunges to its lowest EVER’, declare GB News in their actual 36th tweet about him in 24 hours.

[executive tramp @executive_tramp]

@pamcrawford2 @Jj32278040 @SkipTheT @MailOnline we absolutely are…
It’s a shame you don’t think h&m should be allowed that courtesy too.

[executive tramp @executive_tramp]

@pamcrawford2 @Jj32278040 @SkipTheT @MailOnline Yet you seem to have A LOT to say about him, chum.

You’re not fooling anyone.

[executive tramp @executive_tramp]

@pamcrawford2 @The_Cling_On @MailOnline ‘Stayed out of the media’…

The news outlet you’re responding too has posted 44 tweets about them in the past 24 hours.

More than double that in the past 48
Hours.

Pretty hard to ‘stay out of the media’ when so many of you are obsessing over them.

[executive tramp @executive_tramp]

@pamcrawford2 @Jj32278040 @SkipTheT @MailOnline Not sure why you didn’t just say ‘wife’ there, or even use her name.

Fair enough tho.

i’m not sure the people angrily replying to the 30 odd daily posts about H&M are the target audience for the book, mind you.

But hope you enjoy your copy.

[executive tramp @executive_tramp]

@RosBanks6 @GBNEWS I mean, gbeebs have posted 14 tweets, about H&M, in the past 24 hours and they’ve been the topic of discussion on at least half of their scheduled shows… so I’m guessing they are pretty confident a good number of you care.

[executive tramp @executive_tramp]

@Jj32278040 @SkipTheT @MailOnline you do realise the reason you are finding that ‘there is no getting away from them’ is because the news sources you are following are ‘reporting’ obsessively on them, right?

Those sources, so vehemently against H&M, are constantly feeding you stories… your being used, mate.

[executive tramp @executive_tramp]

@MartinHumphri14 @NWPool09 @leedsandyb76 @rhysjamesy doubling down, there.
good for you.

[executive tramp @executive_tramp]

@BillyBark4 @NicolaDouce @bear_ger @JaneyGodley I think the chances of two being almost identical, in two separate locations and both being picked up and transported to a different location (given how heavy they are and the huge risk of leaving the hole uncovered for any period of time, at a crossing) is wildly unlikely.

[executive tramp @executive_tramp]

@SnappyDragonny @evgenyz @Azven @JaneyGodley it definitely was.

Aside from the fact there is no way all the other ‘lines’ would match so perfectly to another location, the border is also running along the bottom of the dimpled surface.

[executive tramp @executive_tramp]

@BillyBark4 @NicolaDouce @bear_ger @JaneyGodley Sorry to add to the ‘splaining’, but I respectfully disagree Billy.

while the line of squares running down the centre of the cover is incorrect; based on your own image, all other angles are correct.

no way could there be two almost identical covers.

[executive tramp @executive_tramp]

@Christine2523 @GBNEWS no idea, pal. Money? self promotion? set the record straight?

Whatever the answer, doesn’t provide proof of your original tweet, nor does it explain why ‘news outlets’, so desperate for them to disappear, publish multiple stories a day about them… which their viewers lap up.

[executive tramp @executive_tramp]

@Christine2523 @GBNEWS care to cite your source for that claim?

as an aside… you know they didn’t post this article, right? This is the 4th post by this ‘news site’ about them in 24hrs.
Why do you think it looks to you like they aren’t going away? Who do you think benefits from that?

[executive tramp @executive_tramp]

@theoriginal_jz @tamigre06967477 @RonFilipkowski an anomaly, but still wrong, right?

[executive tramp @executive_tramp]

@MarkJon97262432 @Corns1945 @AncientGleek @dave43law @NadineDorries I’m surprised you don’t know this, as you’ve watched and read so much about them, but they never said they wanted privacy.

[executive tramp @executive_tramp]

@MarkJon97262432 @Corns1945 @AncientGleek @dave43law @NadineDorries no pal, you said ‘The world wants them to go away, have their privacy & leave us alone.’… then watched not one but three episodes of a soap opera about them, despite wanting them to ‘go away’, just so you could find something to be annoyed about.

Classic fuck wit behaviour.

[executive tramp @executive_tramp]

@imatteruk_ @MrsMarabou @MailOnline again, no son.

…but that’s probably enough nonsense for me. I suspect we’ve far less in common than this chat has shown and are probably just wasting each other’s time at this point.

All the best and try and live and let live, eh?