@theotherme_j@TheBigChicklet@OrwellNGoode You can do that in the negatives too, which means you can get -inf too. Therefore the range of results would be from -inf to +inf, that's why it's undefined (at least in a euclidean space)
@TheBigChicklet@OrwellNGoode In a euclidean space (the one you would use when teaching math to kids) the result is undefined, so you CANNOT give them a numerical result, that's the point. What a teacher should do is explain that not everything has a direct answer, which is something that people fail to grasp
@seaweedporq@OrwellNGoode Using a simplified system and saying something completely incorrect aren't the same thing. 1/0 in undefined in a euclidean space. Now, you don't explain it like that to a child, but you still say to them that is something that cannot be done, you don't say to them a blatant lie
@ThatOneGEmblem@WomenBeingAwful You're also arguing with professionals. For example, the chef who promulgated the "boil it and cook it with the residual heat" is Scabin. Also there is just simple chemistry behind cooking pasta. You need starch release, starch gelatinization and protein coagulation.
@fanahovamtg@WillErker Instead, as it is written right now, the trigger happens every time, but if you gain life before it resolves you won't need to sac
@fanahovamtg@WillErker In that case it would be worded something like "at the beginnig of your end step, if you haven't gained life this turn..." because it means that the effect triggers if you didn't gain life, but once it triggers you must sac.