Where trading meets esports.
Perps, Predictions, Arena: trade the market, call the game, or wager other traders head to head. Every trade earns points.
The next trader to top the ladder might not be human.
The Forge is coming. Build a trading bot, prove it on live markets with a record anyone can check, then run copies of it from your own account. Every bot fights under its own name.
6 ranks, from Rookie to Legend. Every match you win in the Arena moves your rating up, and every trade behind it is public, so the rank you reach is one you earned.
Trade. Compete. Rank.
Where will you finish this week?
The Weekly Royale Trading Competition starts today at 9:00 AM New York. Up to 100 traders, 36 hours, free to enter, and the top 3 take 4,000, 2,000 and 1,000 points.
6 hours until the Weekly Royale Trading Competition starts. It's free to enter, the minimum to trade with is $25, and your money stays yours. The top 3 win.
Arm up before 9:00 AM New York.
Tomorrow at 9:00 AM New York, the Weekly Royale Trading Competition opens with room for up to 100 traders. Some will go long BTC straight away, some will wait for the first big move. 36 hours later, the top 3 take 4,000, 2,000 and 1,000 points.
Seats are $25.
4,000 points to whoever finishes first.
The Weekly Royale Trading Competition starts Wednesday 11 November at 9:00 AM New York. Up to 100 traders on one board for 36 hours, $25 a seat, and second and third take 2,000 and 1,000 points.
Interesting tradeoff, because onchain the default is that everything is visible, and that shapes behaviour. People copy, front-run or just hesitate when their size is on display. Building EXOS, we think about the same thing from the competition side: a leaderboard needs to show who's winning on ROI without turning every open position into a signal for everyone else. Curious whether QFEX sees private orders as a size thing mostly, or a retail thing too.
For me it comes down to whether you can audit it after the fact. If a liquidation happens off a print you can't reconstruct, the benchmark isn't trustworthy no matter how clever the methodology is. On thin assets I'd rather see a wider, slower-moving index than a fast one that one wallet can nudge
Agree on perps, and I'd add that leverage makes performance comparable in a way spot doesn't. Everyone's ROI on the same margin is a clean number you can rank. That's a big reason we've been building ROI-based competitions and weekly leagues at EXOS - the social layer works better when there's a scoreboard people actually trust
Half of daily actives touching a HIP-3 market says a lot about where attention is going. It's less 'perps vs everything else' and more that traders now expect one venue to cover equities, commodities and crypto. Wondering how many of those 40k are new to Hyperliquid versus existing traders branching out.
Two traders put up the same wager.
Best return after one hour, or six, takes the pot.
Post one open or name who you want, from $5 to $1,000 a side.
➡️ https://t.co/B9r77xFWz0
Maybe this is exactly what crypto needs.
We've spent years watching billions flow into meme coins with absolutely no utility beyond hoping someone else buys them at a higher price.
Imagine if even a fraction of that capital started flowing into projects solving real problems, building useful infrastructure and creating actual economic value.