@CrtnOperator It definitely matters what an authors intention is, because it’s the key to more accurate interpretation. Theres a difference between analysis and saying the curtains are green.
@Revenant300@Telepeturtle its alright, your analysis is just analysis and the artist calls the shots ultimately, no need to get sand in your vagina about it.
@Creeammyiicee@AsheConstella Portraying living breathing women, yes would be objectification. You can’t objectify a character, as it literally is an object.
Also pretty sexist to call a drawing of a character a misrepresentation of women as a whole like they’re a monolith lmfao; you’re trying too hard.
@Revenant300@Telepeturtle “The artist has stripped it away.” If the point is still tangible, and it connects with people even one; then it hasn’t been stripped away.
I think you overrate representation if anything, like most psuedo-thinkers on this app trying to dictate what art can and can’t be or say.
@Revenant300@Telepeturtle I read what you said, never once do you explain why it objectively loses it’s meaning, just that it does because of some arbirtrary reason in your head.
Drawings can represent a point and the oc itself can still be just an object. You’re making this harder on yourself.
@Revenant300@Telepeturtle It ceases to hold it’s meaning based on what exactly…?
Thats not how representation works lmfao, you can have a character be a stand-in to make a point in one drawing but as a whole still be just a character in all others; they aren’t mutually exclusive.
@darkdriftknight@MMZ081114 Thats not even mentioning Funger, like what the fuck are you even trying to prove other than you have zero moral backbone lol
@darkdriftknight@MMZ081114 All of that yap and you’re a Persona 1-3 and Fear and Hunger fan lmfaooo
Yknow Persona, where a teenager summons sex demons and a literal giant sentient penis monster
By your own logic you’re twice to blame for willingly consuming media that goes against your (fake) principles.