Agree with the sentiment or if they deadass didn’t mean it that way and it came off that way anyway
Just harder to get an explanation, but it’s obviously needed rn
Spoke abt disagreeing with an amab person mimicking a trans man���s’ top scars, and woobifyinf the trans-MALE experience w/their comments, implying femininity onto transmales to experience their own way of transfeminity.
It was an incredibly muddy conversation
It’s just way harder for me to not respond to this bc i couldn’t tolerate if someone else suddenly decided to post old screencaps of some of my mutuals moments of stupidity or moments where u could misconstrue it against them and have them hung at dawn for it even if they do not-
-the end of the day he will not see either party as less or not enough- and I do think it’s strange to analyze someone’s sexual or identity preferences in a way that only makes them hesitant to understand themselves more esp if the preferred ways are done out of trauma
Doc was sexually exploited online by afab people who identify as women, he has every right to not be comfortable with depictions other than T4T or specific cis QUEER women who might lean more into neutral stereotypes than overtly feminine stereotypes
But he does not see non-transitioned woman as lesser of their identity nor does he see a non-transitioned man as any lesser of their identity— this would be so easy to understand if asked or talked about without the tension
Js bc he’s not articulated very well doesn’t mean at
Why is a trans-man not comfortable with the idea of being presented as a woman is a problem now, this is why I feel as if this situation was never being taken that seriously and you should’ve never roped my problems into personal issues you had with him