@Ken67547214 I’m from Costa Rica and the explanation in the OP is straight up made up. Ancient tribes didn’t even have a writing system so there’s no way to know what they thought about two guys having sex other than the fact they liked to make sculptures and drawings of it.
@BIMBOSATTVA_ It's just a matter of time. Sam won't waste an opportunity to gain the people's goodwill by releasing a similar model without the guardrails.
The best (worst) part is that it doesn't even matter because they can just claim that it can since no one can access it and verify that it can. And you'll only get access if you already buy into the narrative that it can, so if you do have access you have no motivation to verify it. And if for some reason you still try, they will revoke your access before you can verify anything.
They want a Deus absconditus.
How can you admit you did wrong when your whole worldview revolves around being LessWrong?
You can't take accountability when you seriously believe your beliefs are just an outgrowth of pure reason and that anyone who doesn't share them is just not as enlightened/reasonable as you. It's a hypostatization of Reason and The Sequences are the gnostic texts you must internalize to unite yourself with the One, at which point there is no distinction and therefore no argument to be had: it's an identity between the mind of the knower and the object known.
It's not that Sam believes he isn't guilty, it's that, in his mind, he *knows* he isn't guilty, and if you fail to see his guiltlessness then that's just a reflection of your distance from Reason and the pitiful impurity of your soul.
Many people struggle to understand you can be extremely logical while also being extremely stupid, without the latter negating the former.
Given enough time, an autistic kid who's obsessed with Thomas the Tank Engine will probably end up developing robust logical system to understand the world, characters, plots, animation style, and anything else you might think of (in a way he can't help it, his mind craves for order and understanding).
n fact I just checked and there are more than 18k pages in the Thomas the Tank Engine Wiki, which has been consistently maintained by fans since 2006. I wouldn't dare put into question the logical ability, intellectual integrity, reasonableness, rigor, and honesty of the people who maintain the site. But at the end of the day, it's just Thomas the Tank Engine.
Harmless enough, right? However things can turn real dangerous real quick once that kid starts to believe Thomas the Tank Engine makes more sense than the real world, and that, actually, the real world should aspire to be much more similar to Thomas the Tank Engine's world.
Finally I can read a description of the text missing important information instead of reading the text itself with all the information I need. Thank you Apple!