Our haters once more are salivating at both my hard fits and over how we're mobilizing working NYC to VOTE NO on prop 2, 3 and 4, which is a giveaway to predatory developers in a Trojan horse of 'affordable housing'
UPDATE: balenciaga NIMBY is back to oppose ballot measures that would streamline affordable housing… and this time he has upgraded his balenciaga hat to a $3k balenciaga jacket
(don’t listen to balenciaga NIMBY. vote YES on ballot measures 2-4)
@katewillett It will however streamline the process of luxury buildings that will funnel into LES and Chinatown and whichever parts of NYC that have been staying strong against the yimby plague i fear
@mayjunejuna@loud_socialist most progressive and grassroots housing orgs will say no to 2, 3 and 4. we've seen these developers destroy neighborhoods like williamsburg and attack harlem, south bronx and inwood.
we know when that fancy building goes up across the street our rent going up.
@ElvinBen Proposals 2, 3, 4 do not fund or mandate affordable units. They do nothing to repair NYCHA or preserve at-risk rent regulated units. They do not add a single nickel of subsidy or voucher. They do place most of the power in the hands of the mayor and his appointees however
@SeQuestoEunUomo@sam_d_1995 we're not maoists T.T (and we weren't in the 80s either), we continue to organize against exploitation tho. https://t.co/R7lopplEDA
It’s time to reframe the conversation about abundance and growth.
NIMBYism isn’t about process or “community control.” And abundance isn’t about deregulation.
It’s about power—and who our institutions should serve.
My latest in @newrepublic👇🏼 https://t.co/MJczmhe16Q