New preprint names senior gov officials who analyzed CDC data per my FOIA, but demanded I not publish due to implications for WHO, Gates
Evidence that Spanish flu, AIDS, polio, RSV, Lyme, Ebola, & mpox came from labs, and CDC coverup drove WHO tragedy
https://t.co/fHUZA6msIJ
@BanounHelene@JesslovesMJK Helene, I found a lot more evidence now. I went through thousands of old news papers from the 1970s. It's all there in black and white. I'm trying to finish ASAP. Sorry for the delay, but it'll be worth it. I promise.
True, but giving one man that much power usually leads to tyranny. See Venezuela.
Medellín accomplished the same miraculous transformation without playing the leadership Lottery or the iron fist. They focused on giving the poor opportunities.
Hong Kong became a safe, economic powerhouse through positive non-interventionism--just get out of the way.
It worked in El Salvador, but there are less risky ways to reach the same result.
@RTENewsPaulC Paul, sorry to bomb your thread, but I couldn't find another way... I'm trying to watch "Bad Blood", and see the adverts you mentioned in the UK inquiry. I'm working on a documentary you might find interesting. I'm on DM and aaron [at] https://t.co/pYDRlcqZsE
New preprint names senior gov officials who analyzed CDC data per my FOIA, but demanded I not publish due to implications for WHO, Gates
Evidence that Spanish flu, AIDS, polio, RSV, Lyme, Ebola, & mpox came from labs, and CDC coverup drove WHO tragedy
https://t.co/fHUZA6msIJ
@stanvanpelt BS. A lab origin is proven far beyond reasonable doubt:
https://t.co/HR8pNCfz20
The problem are science "journalists" like you that censor the hard evidence they receive and keep misleading their readers out of fear of losing access to their sources.
I was about to publish a video with updated findings. But there was still one gap. East and Southern Africa were hiv free in 1981. By 1985 1/3 of Zambians were infected.
I finally was able to find the very first HIV+ samples collected in the region. They were genetically sequenced and reveal what happened. But they were excluded from analysis in all the official narratives, which argue HIV spread from the Congo east and south. It didn't.
I'm rewriting now and will try to get this finished ASAP.
Wrong, wrong, wrong. You refused to state the date the CDC first used the term AIDS, because it was on September 3, 1982, in a bulletin stating AIDS was caused by plasmapheresis or the blood products made from them. Sex wasn't even suspected, because all early AIDS cases at that point had been subjected to plasmapheresis. Every single case among Haitians was in the "boat people" who arrived in Florida as refugees and were screened on arrival for antigens to harvest by plasmapheresis. The Sept 3 bulletin identified the blind-spot in these products since they were all made with chimpanzees, based on the assumption that chimps couldn't harbor harmful viruses. Soon, remains of the very 1969 chimp used to harvest antibodies/antigens tested positive, and the NY heroin users who received them were confirmed to have had AIDS by 1973. At that point, the entire global scientific community started pretending the original Sept 3, 1982 bulletin never existed, spreading the demonstrably false lie that you just repeated--that AIDS was introduced on Sept 24 as a sexually transmissible disease. I loaded all the 1982 Symposium transcripts and papers into this public ChatGPT session you can resume to interrogate them and verify the AI summary. As of 1982, the global scientific community was unanimous: AIDS was caused by plasmapheresis and the products made from them. Fauci stood alone in blaming the victims.
https://t.co/crjwq7VOYz
@alphast@BanounHelene@oranaise@asteris@mayasdreams@UlrichJvV@alphast I focus on proving the CDC's original AIDS explanation--not autism.
We can settle this unambiguously. Please state the date the CDC named the disease "AIDS", and confirm if it initially suspected primary transmission was by sex or blood.
@vivianpsd ⚠️⚠️Click bait. Here's the tool: https://t.co/MB8AyiRTdD Note they don't give any info on pricing, technology, local, cloud, etc. You have to sign up first and accept their terms and conditions without even knowing what you're signing up for
You left out that the authors’ FOIA’d emails showed they kept finding a correlation between mercury and autism no matter how they tweaked the data — until the final version conveniently found nothing.
It’s the same story as the Proximal Origin Slack messages calling a lab leak “so friggin likely,” while their published paper declared it “impossible.”
People treat the final studies as gospel, ignoring the private messages showing even the authors didn’t believe them.
@IanCopeland5@PLOSBiology@PLOS@DrAndyWakefield Not true. Hilleman, the inventor of the MMR vaccine, expressed the concern on 1990. Years before Wakefield. This CDC study found a 7.6x elevated risk.
Later the CDC said it was preliminary and reversed. Wakefield's study came out during the controversy in 1998.
@DrNeilStone We all agree *something* is causing it. But every time a biochemical mechanism is proposed you insist that couldn't possibly be the cause. So, what do you think the actual cause of autism is? Aliens? Witchcraft?