All NBA

The guy who post controversial takes.

[All NBA @factnbamusee]

LeBron has play 1,363 games. MJ played 1,072

If MJ were to play the same amount of games as LeBron he would have a career total of:

41,026.

[All NBA @factnbamusee]

@matt_powell91 @Jacobtheclipper Hart is about 8 inches smaller

[All NBA @factnbamusee]

@TalesOTLevant @Khryn_Tzu @sovereignbrah Well under an atheist worldview, no, because nothing can be objectively wrong for an atheist.

[໊໊ @juniorkingpp]

This the coldest family portrait I’ve ever seen.

[All NBA @factnbamusee]

@rider2221390689 @jrc99us @darwintojesus "Harm" is a subjective term.

In order for something to be objective, it has to exist outside of any human thoughts, feelings, and emotions.

[All NBA @factnbamusee]

@PhantomThorns @jrc99us @darwintojesus So, under your worldview, you agree that saying something like "murder is wrong" would be subjectively true but not an objective moral truth?

[All NBA @factnbamusee]

@stolperson @jrc99us @darwintojesus So you agree that would be subjective morality and not objective morality?

[All NBA @factnbamusee]

@Gargotejant @jrc99us @darwintojesus "To everyone" is not a good answer because objective morality needs to exist outside of human feelings and emotions.

[All NBA @factnbamusee]

@tontondavid10 @jrc99us @darwintojesus So that would be group preference and not objective morality?

[All NBA @factnbamusee]

@Carina_Amyth @KolyaUrtz @esjesjesj Why are those traits objectively good, and not subjectively good? Because by definition, for something to be objective, it can't be influenced by human feelings or opinions.

[All NBA @factnbamusee]

@ascended_kiyo @BraedenSorbo @esjesjesj Just because something is intrinsic does not mean it is objective.

Evolution can tell us why we feel certain moral impulses, but it can't tell us whether or not those impulses are actually correct.

Without an objective moral giver (God), objective morals can exist.

[All NBA @factnbamusee]

@industrialpc @BraedenSorbo @esjesjesj If our morality is derived from evolution, then it would not be objective. It would simply be the morality that the majority of people prefer.

[All NBA @factnbamusee]

@SaaxxAppeal @BraedenSorbo @esjesjesj Group preference is not the same as objective morality.

[All NBA @factnbamusee]

@niftytoast3110 @BraedenSorbo @esjesjesj "Harm" is a subjective term. Someone may think I harmed someone if I kill them, while I think what I did was good because I got to steal their money and feed my family.

You can't use subjective terms to try and explain why morality is objective.

[All NBA @factnbamusee]

@RMcqueso @BraedenSorbo @esjesjesj God permitting something simply because the alternative was much is much worse is not the same as him being okay with it.

[All NBA @factnbamusee]

@KingpinPerez @BraedenSorbo @esjesjesj Without a God, how do we figure out what the "highest ideal conceivable" is?

Your highest ideal may be helping the homeless, while mine may be killing someone.

How do we figure out which one of these things is OBJECTIVELY better?

[All NBA @factnbamusee]

@GregCampNC @AbbyJohnson Murder = Intentionally ending the life of an innocent human being

Abortion = intentionally ending the life of an innocent human being

Abortion = murder.

[𝚌𝚕𝚞𝚖𝚙 𝚘𝚏 𝚌𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚜 @ZELLKLUMPEN]

no.

[TatumsWrld @wrldoftatum]

How it feels being in the Eastern Conference away from SGA Jokic and Wemby

[gaz @____GAZ_____]

Told my girlfriend that mum is deaf so speak loud and slow.

Also told mum that my girlfriend is special needs