Was wondering why my article about Stephanie Soo siding with Kim Sang-Kyo was blowing up again all of a sudden... apparently she is at it again with the misinformation and biased storytelling, once again ignoring victims... what's new ๐
If someone is willing to sit down watching another person eat a disgusting amount of food while discussing the violent murder of other people, that says a lot about them. No surprise that Stephanie Soo's fanbase will now go as far as defending a convicted sex offender.
Taking a brainless group of mukbang viewers who watch people gorging food for fun and bringing them over to true crime, which actually involves some brainwork was never a good idea. Look at the monster of a fanbase Stephanie Soo has created.
What has Stephanie Soo done to convince such a large proportion of her viewers that she is a blameless human being incapable of making mistakes, to the point where they are willing to defend a convicted sex offender just to cape for her?
@MathetesDi56253@sangyeonnie_mp3@Lata04751915 If you are looking for something that attempts to argue against Burning Sun in general, you won't find it here and I will not be having that conversation with you. Because that is not what I attempted to do in the first place. Stop projecting and learn how to stick to an issue.
@MathetesDi56253@sangyeonnie_mp3@Lata04751915 Disprove what facts? If you are unable to grasp the main idea of a text, please go back to middle school. The point of my article is that all victims should be given fair consideration of their claims and not be gaslit just because someone wants to praise their assaulter.
@sangyeonnie_mp3@MathetesDi56253 The entire point of my article is that all claims of SA should be given equal consideration. Maybe go back to school first before you come at me.
@sangyeonnie_mp3@Lata04751915@MathetesDi56253 Of course my article isn't "objective," it's an opinion piece. But what my article is, is based on facts. Which her claims about Kim Sang-Kyo aren't.
@sangyeonnie_mp3@Lata04751915@MathetesDi56253 And where did you get the idea that I'm a fan of Seungri when there is no attempt to even defend him and I even acknowledge that her other content about victims shouldn't be discounted?
@sangyeonnie_mp3@Lata04751915@MathetesDi56253 I never claimed in my article that the credibility of her entire video should be destroyed. I even said in the article that the rest of the content about other victims shouldn't be discounted. Learn to read first before trying to misrepresent others' words.
Scandal always gets more clicks than the truth and she makes money for clicks. Doesnโt take an engineering degree to know sheโs selling lies. Same for tabloid media.
@Srbn99_ @germgirlz That is not even the extent of what she said about Kim. She spent a whole 7 mins uplifting him prior to this part. And for her to just dismiss the claims against him as "fishy" shows she is 100% on his side.
@MathetesDi56253 You dismissing the victims' stories as a "wattpad novel" tells me that you and Stephanie come from the same branch and don't actually care about victims.
@MathetesDi56253 Seungri isn't even mentioned in my article so it's clear you didn't read it. I only included his hashtag in my tweet because that is who Stephanie made the video about. And whether you like it or not, her defending a sex criminal makes her motive questionable.
This ape told total imaginary lies about Joongki and made it viral before. Where are all those woke psychotic ultra femis now who had been attacking him together with her but now silent on this? Nasty people support nasty ones. It's normal that this nasty ape is an xyz fan ๐คฎ