Hi, my name is @fadeeveryonenow, and I’m a $MEME (@Memecoin) farmer at @Memeland.
On my honor, I promise that I will do my best to do my duty to my own bag, and to farm #MEMEPOINTS at all times.
It ain’t much, but it’s honest work. 🧑🌾
@Tom24693304@_JHokanson So Nick Saban telling players to do their job and the record will come on 2007 was a dumb thing? You’re completely right I forgot how badly that went
@TrueDoftheAR @DashDobrofsky They don’t have open discussions to protect the court from external pressure that could change votes to a point that doesn’t agree with their own beliefs or constitutional interpretation. They also release opinions afterwards showing their entire line of thinking. Good job prof
@DonLew87 Attacking a mans marriage seems low. Everyone can have their opinions but don’t attack personal things especially with a following so big. Bad example set for everyday people
@whoknewyouscrew @SOrt0809 @RWPUSA@silverfemale1 I’d hate for nothing to come of an investigation involving emails. That would really stink wouldn’t it
@DashDobrofsky Got to be one of the most uneducated things I’ve read in a while. First this definitely didn’t happen you just want to virtue signal you’re standing up for what you believe. Second you don’t understand the function of the Supreme Court. Their only decision is to decide on whether
@DashDobrofsky integrity of the Supreme Court was compromised. They are the 9 justices chosen to vote on whether something is constitutional or not without biases. Biases does not mean they will not be biased to a party due to what they believe but that they will not take bribes or advise from
@DashDobrofsky someone who wanted a news story. Also, brief takes almost two months until the final decision comes out. Someone could likely change their vote over that time but now that the number is out there is pressure to change or not change a vote. This type of pressure is exactly why the
@DashDobrofsky unconstitutional to require states to do that. The vote was also supposedly 7-2 so someone most likely flipped party lines. This should never be reported early and it is a sad day for SCOTUS because if this happens once it will happen again and it’s integrity has been breached by
@DashDobrofsky something is constitutional or not. They did not take away a right. They simply deemed that it should be left to the states to decide what to do independently rather than having a government implemented program. They are not taking making it illegal they are simply saying it is