@Dylzzyy I replayed it like a year ago and don't remember anything tedious. You have to use your brain a bit and think about your loadouts, seems like a good design to carry over to GTA6
@RileyEatsGood hey buddy it's made to run on a console released 6+ years ago. This will be 60+ FPS on my pc
In the long run people will be looking at this game in 2035 going "damn this still looks insane", just like we do with RDR2 today.
@NOTTHISWAYQQ wrong, it's the reason RDR2 is still one of the best looking games of all time. It's future proofing. PCfags will be playing this in 60+ FPS
@GloryMu14@Newsandstuff4me@Awk20000 "You could have impeached Hegseth" - you're genuinely trying to say most people will read this and understand the nuance that its virtually guaranteed to fail because of who controls congress right now?
99% of dumbass voters see this and go "omg dems protected Hegseth". Be real
@GloryMu14@Newsandstuff4me@Awk20000 Conviction required 2/3rds of a /republican senate/. It is a higher bar, you can't extend this argument to "should not show up for anything".
David's main point is people are just LYING about the vote, "He would have been impeached" - they can criticize absences without lies
@WinstonHoward@Awk20000 Fighting what? Dems don't have the votes until January. It's literally simple math. What do you want them to do, storm the capitol?
@WinstonHoward@Awk20000 "you guys"? Do you think I don't want Hegseth gone? And again, what was "their job" here? Can we point to a functional loss? I genuinely don't get it, this vote had no chance regardless of who showed up. They will vote again once dems have congress. Why are you all so mad?
@GloryMu14@Newsandstuff4me@Awk20000 How would you define their job? Is their goal to do performative signaling votes on a non-starter, or to push through things that matter?
I am genuinely asking what you wanted them to do here and why you think it would matter. This is just such a nothingburger to get mad about
@GloryMu14@Newsandstuff4me@Awk20000 So to be clear - you are just mad because they didn't show up to a performative vote? Am I missing anything here? Your reasoning can't be that cringe and dumb can it...?
@WinstonHoward@Awk20000 Can you provide any other explanation for what they're doing here? How else do you rationalize this? What would you call what they're doing if not trying to "divide the party" by pointing fingers at dems when it is a REPUBLICAN CONTROLLED CONGRESS
@WinstonHoward@Awk20000 why are you not mad that political pundits are lying about basic civics? what do you think dem leadership should have done here instead?
"Procedural technicality" is a delusional reframing. Objectively it wasn't an impeachment vote, and it wouldn't have passed regardless
@WinstonHoward@Awk20000 .. you post "the most hypocritical video I've seen in quite some time" without watching any of it? glad to hear you're engaging your critical thinking skills before tweeting bullshit
people explicitly tweeted "it is dems fault Pete hegseth wasn't just impeached" - blatant lie