Fake Math

Female. Work in ER. Pro-Star Trek.

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@Dav3Shanahan @minagelina1 @conlin_lauren He did mention the DV case on his form. The prosecution team questioned him about it.

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@CTKayMarie @PhilipCDube Per Paula, the black male holdout juror initially eas for guilty of first deg murder. after reviewing Lindsay’s police interview, he changed mind to guilty of manslaughter. he never believed Lindsay was in psychosis, thus he’s not obligated to vote NGRI.

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@nosugarallspite @judgejessica_ Per Paula, the black male holdout juror deliberated and changed mind from guilty of first deg murder to guilty if manslaughter. he never thought Lindsay was in psychosis. he’s not obligated to vote NGRI.

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@SerenaAbutilon @NJBeisner to clarify facts, the restraining order on the nephew was for an incident when the nephew was 19 yrs old. not saying it makes it much better. BUT I also think to have a good faith debate, we need to ensure facts are straight

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@Abfab_Astrid @theCatTastrophy That was Paula Devlin’a description of what happened in her multiple interviews on him and the jury deliberations

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@SteveR324 @TanyaLee31763 honestly, I am unimpressed with multiple members of this jury for various reasons. I’d actually argue that multiple jury members were questionable at doing what the job entailed. People tend to forgive the faults of those that still voted how they preferred.

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@GlammaSooz @Hendu1124 But 8 other jurors also had their mind made up. 1 who voted NGRI admitted to disregarding the evidence. The holdout juror never believed Lindsay was in psychosis. After reviewing Lindsay’s police interview, he changed mind from guilty of 1st deg murder to guilty of manslaughter

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@layneashley222 well given the Karen Read and Sandra Birchmore cases, MA state & local police clearly have issues

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@ocamsrazor @theCatTastrophy He never believed she was in psychosis. If he didn’t believe she was in psychosis, then he’s not obligated to vote NGRI. He did deliberate & change mind from guilty of 1st deg murder to guilty of manslaughter. That’s still within rules

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@Abfab_Astrid @theCatTastrophy This juror initially believed Lindsay was guilty of 1st deg murder. He deliberated & changed mind after reviewing Lindsay’s police interview. He thought she was guilty of manslaughter. He never thought she was in psychosis, so he’s not obligated to vote NGRI

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@theCatTastrophy This juror initially believed Lindsay was guilty of 1st deg murder. He deliberated & changed mind after reviewing Lindsay’s police interview. He thought she was guilty of manslaughter. He never thought she was in psychosis, so he’s not obligated to vote NGRI

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@nosugarallspite @judgejessica_ This juror initially believed Lindsay was guilty of 1st deg murder. He deliberated & changed mind after reviewing Lindsay’s police interview. He thought she was guilty of manslaughter. He never thought she was in psychosis, so he’s not obligated to vote NGRI

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@nosugarallspite @judgejessica_ The jurors were also allowed to vote guilty on lesser charges including manslaughter (judge confirmed to have instructed them on this).

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@layneashley222 In the Clancy trial, the grounds for appealing a conviction doesn’t apply. But I’m thinking broadly for all cases

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@layneashley222 I am also wary of how far we want to take public scrutiny & aggressive tactics to kick out or invalidate a juror during deliberation and post-trial for anything other than violating sequestration rules etc. That can be grounds for an appeal if someone gets convicted due to it.

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@layneashley222 I’d want to know y the prosecutor & defense lawyer either picked or didn’t object to jurors with red flags. Maybe there’s more context than we know.

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@layneashley222 I’m open to that. But I think it’s fairer to let us scrutinize the records of the rest of 12 and alternates. Bc if we find that > 2 jurors have red flags, they also deserve heat & there’s a broader systemic issue in MA.

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@SteveR324 @HighbrowHaze He initially felt she was guilty of 1st deg murder. After reviewing police interview, he changed mind to guilty of manslaughter. He never thought she was in psychosis, hence he’s not obligated to vote NGRI

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@SteveR324 @RevRestraint He deliberated and changed his mind from guilty if 1st deg murder to guilty of manslaughter after he reviewed her phone interview. Other jurors changed their mind to, but in a different direction. He never thought Lindsay was in psychosis.

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@layneashley222 the problem is we know of 2 jurors. all 12 plus alternates haven’t been sussed out the same in the media. I’d like to know either no one’s record or everyone’s record.

[Fake Math @fakedmath]

@layneashley222 no. I don’t necessarily agree with him. I’m also not defending allegations & charges. but I like to hear the full context before making assumptions, esp in context of divorce, child custody, & family court. I also think the juror picks are on the prosecutor & defense