Allen James III🇺🇸

Jesus 1. Family 2. Church 3. LJ Productions / Big Shot Ocean Media Sports Broadcasting. Stock Trader. Crypto Hodler

[Secretary Kennedy @SecKennedy]

Yesterday, I retired 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices or ACIP, the @CDCgov external panel that wields the grave responsibility of adding new vaccines to the recommended childhood schedule. Over the coming days, I will use this platform to announce new members to populate ACIP. None of these individuals will be ideological anti-vaxxers. They will be highly credentialed physicians and scientists who will make extremely consequential public health determinations by applying evidence-based decision-making with objectivity and common sense.

I will also be tweeting examples of the historical corruption at ACIP to help the public understand why this clean sweep was necessary.

The most outrageous example of ACIP’s malevolent malpractice has been its stubborn unwillingness to demand adequate safety trials before recommending new vaccines for our children. Today, a compliant American child receives between 69 and 92 routine vaccines (depending on brand/dictated dosage) from conception to 18 years of age. This is up from 11 shots in 1986. ACIP has recommended each of these additional jabs without requiring placebo-controlled trials for any of them. This means that no one can scientifically ascertain whether these products are averting more problems than they are causing.

Many vaccine promoters have challenged this assertion. They are always wrong. Last week, @CNN, which has devolved into a shameless propagandist for Big Pharma, triumphantly announced that it had proof that my pronouncement that “there have been no placebo-controlled safety trials for any routine vaccines” was false. CNN gleefully proclaimed that it had found 257 placebo-controlled studies for routine vaccines.

So, allow me a moment to deconstruct CNN’s claims. Warning: this post may only be sufferable for science geeks like myself.

CNN is wrong. No routine injected vaccine on CDC’s schedule was licensed for children based on a placebo-controlled trial. In instances where a vaccine was used as a control, it too was never licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial. That is not conjecture. It is a fact based on FDA’s clinical trial data. (See https://t.co/q1xAtVxJ4N). As Secretary of @HHSGov, acknowledging this lamentable truth is part of my promise of radical transparency.

The 257 studies cited by CNN unwittingly reflect the lack of safety trials underpinning CDC’s schedule. Despite CNN’s worldwide effort to crowdsource trials with a placebo control (per @US_FDA/@CDCgov, an “inert substance”*), this list, on its face, reflects that 236 of the studies clearly did not use an “inert” safety comparator in a trial to license an injected routine vaccine for children on CDC’s schedule.**

For the remaining 21 studies CNN’s list claims used an inert injection, 9 plainly did not:

• RCT 251, 252 (Varivax) injected an antibiotic, neomycin – not inert.
• RCT 84, 97 (HPV-16 and 16/18) injected aluminum adjuvant – not inert.
• RCT 215 (Almevax) injected another vaccine – not inert.
• RCT 55 (Lyophilized PedvaxHIB) injected lactose, aluminum adjuvant, and thimerosal – not inert.
• RCT 197 (Salk vaccine) injected 199 solution, synthetic tissue culture, ethanol, phenol red, antibiotics, and formalin – not inert.***
• RCT 168 (Dow’s MMR) injected full vaccine minus virus, including all stabilizers, antibiotics, diluent, preservative, and buffers – not inert.****
• RCT 189 (Menveo) injected Tdap+saline or Menveo+saline – not inert.

For the remaining 12 listed studies which may have had an inert injection, none was a trial relied upon to license a routine vaccine on CDC’s childhood schedule:

• RCT 170, 171, 172 (MMR VaxPro), 228 (PCV11), 136 (Vaxigrip), 242 (Antitetanus), and 122 (Chinese flu shots) trialed vaccines never licensed in the U.S. nor relied upon to license a U.S. vaccine.
• RCT 124 (Fluzone IIV3), 102 (WVV/SPV), and 188 (Menveo) trials occurred after each respective vaccine was licensed, hence were not relied upon for their licensure.
• RCT 176 (Mumps vaccine) was not relied upon by the FDA to license the current MMR vaccine. (See MMR-II clinical trial report in link above.)
• RCT 53 (PRP-D) was for a vaccine withdrawn soon after its introduction and not relied upon by the FDA to license any U.S. vaccine.

While these 12 studies were not relied upon to license a routine vaccine on the CDC’s schedule, they do reflect that a placebo-controlled trial of a vaccine is possible. They also reflect what can be learned when a placebo trial is performed. For example: RCT 136 found the vaccine ineffective; RCT 122 found that “severe adverse effects occurred in 69 (0·6%, 95% CI 0·5–0·8) recipients of vaccine compared with one recipient (0·1%, 0–0·2) of placebo.”; and RCT 124 found “the rate of hospitalization was actually higher in the [Fluzone IIV3] vaccine group than in the placebo group.”

The unfortunate reality is that placebo-controlled trials, however, do not occur and have not been relied upon when FDA licenses vaccines for injection during childhood or ACIP recommends the shot for addition to the CDC’s routine schedule.

CNN would have reached the same conclusion had it reviewed the FDA documentation for each vaccine, instead of relying upon a random, crowd-sourced list from the internet. CNN’s list ironically proves the lack of adequate safety trials for routine childhood vaccines.

It is time to stop playing games, such as CNN’s false gotcha. We have gone from 3 routine injections by age one in 1986 (the year the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act passed) to 25 routine injections by age one in 2025 (which now does not include Covid-19 vaccine). Because of the 1986 Act, every one of these products, save one, was developed by companies knowing they would almost never be liable for serious harm. During this same period, chronic diseases in our children exploded, most of which are caused by immune system dysregulation. If we are to identify the exposures that are causing this epidemic of autoimmune diseases, we need to rule out products given dozens of times to young children, specifically to modify the immune system, as potential culprits.

Our infants and children deserve the best safety trials possible to keep them safe. We should care as much about every child who could be injured by one of these products as we do every child who could be injured by an infectious disease. We must protect all children.

Notes:

* https://t.co/o6PtXJVxrv (“Placebos, defined as inert substances with no pharmacologic activity, are commonly used in double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trials.”); https://t.co/KwvrlZSkok (“the placebo control design, by … including a group that receives an inert treatment…”); https://t.co/8eJ0PNI5Mp (“Placebo: A substance or treatment that has no effect on living beings, usually used as a comparison to vaccine or medicine in clinical trials.”).

** While the above addresses injected vaccines, CNN’s cited list also includes 10 trials for rotavirus vaccine, given by oral drops, but none of these trials used saline only drops. Instead, RCT 205, 207, 208, 209, 210, 213 (Rotarix) contained dextran, sorbitol, amino acids, dulbecco’s modified eagle medium, calcium carbonate, and xanthan; RCT 211, 212 (RotaTeq) contained polysorbate 80, sucrose, citrate and phosphate; and RCT 206, 214 (Rotavac) included neomycin sulphate, kanamycin acid sulphate, trehalose, lactalbumin hydrolysate, human albumin, potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate, dipotassium hydrogen orthophosphate, and trisodium citrate dihydrate. The list also included three trials of an inhaled flu vaccine; the controls in RCT 104 were OPV+saline or LAIV (a vaccine), hence neither inert; in RCT 106 the control “consisted of normal allantoic fluid harvested from uninfected eggs stabilized with sucrose–phosphate–glutamate”; and, in RCT 109, the control was “intranasal spray of egg allantoic fluid containing sucrose-phosphate-glutamate.”

*** Note that the current polio vaccines used in the U.S. are a different product than the polio vaccine developed by Jonas Salk in the 1950s—which was discontinued in the 1960s—including because the currently-used polio vaccines are “grown in vero cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells cultivated on microcarriers.”

Hence, the Salk trial was not relied upon to license any current polio vaccine.

https://t.co/ko1RUVXSYi; https://t.co/FnwWUZulTF;
https://‌https://t.co/jWbEOEXKIG‌media/1222‌49/‌vero-cell-line-profile.pdf; https://t.co/dg7R93iqT2.

**** Dow Chemical’s MMR vaccine used different strains than any licensed U.S. MMR vaccine and also, after 14 days of safety review, this trial vaccinated all participants.

[Mary Talley Bowden MD @MaryBowdenMD]

It would take a stroke of a pen to pull the Covid shots off the market.

What’s the problem?
@SecKennedy @DrMakaryFDA

[Mary Talley Bowden MD @MaryBowdenMD]

People in a position of power who are staying silent for the sake of politics have blood on their hands. If the shots aren’t safe enough for you or your children, then why are they safe enough for everyone else. @SecKennedy @DrMakaryFDA

[Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie]

If you think Real ID is about election integrity, you’re going to be sorely disappointed. Someone has lied to you or you’re engaged in wishful thinking.

Please don’t shoot the messenger.

[Shannon Joy @ShannonJoyRadio]

F that tyrant Barbie.

[Tom Renz @RenzTom]

Did you know that the upcoming universal digital ID our government is pushing - the Real ID - was passed into law under globalist George Bush? Implementation has been delayed since passage in 2005 because no one wanted digital ID (which is what this is). Even Obama couldn’t get this moving but now MAGA has its defenses down… but in this case - respectfully - Trump I’d absolutely dead wrong.

Now - as I predicted - this is getting pushed through under the guise of preventing voter fraud.

Apparently we didn’t learn from the Patriot Act that when you sacrifice your freedom for security you get neither… and this will absolutely destroy our freedoms. @VigilantFox @KanekoaTheGreat @RealAlexJones @SidneyPowell1

[Just.A.Thought 💭 @e_galv]

I’m seeing a lot of people confused about Real ID and whether or not we should be concerned about it.

Firstly, you should know that if you have a passport, you do not need to get a Real ID.

But the problem with Real ID is that it will inevitably lead to a Digital ID, which many of us have been warning about for years now.

It’s not “harmless” and it doesn’t protect against terrorism. What it does do is gather all of your information and hand it to the government- something we used to actually be concerned with.

It’s forcing you to “carry papers” and once carrying those papers/records are accepted by the public as normal and become digitalized, they will be affected by your behaviors (social credit), and dictate your accessibility to resources.

What was one of the first things that happened to Canadian truckers protesting vaccination? Their bank accounts were frozen. This is not some dystopian tale… this has happened and will happen more frequently.

Your blind faith in government (on “both sides) is what makes it more powerful and allows it to continue to overreach in these ways. Stop supporting it. Stop rationalizing it. Stop believing its purpose is to protect you.

Otherwise, you have given up your liberty for some notion of safety and well… you know how that goes.

[MJTruthUltra @MJTruthUltra]

Dear @Sec_Noem,

Many of us are confused by this action.

We just exited an administrative state of censorship and domestic spying on Americans… we’re not looking for more surveillance, especially any that spiraled from 9/11.

Can you clearly define the reason for this without political filters?

We’re really trying to understand.
Help us understand.

@realDonaldTrump @DonaldJTrumpJr

[Tom Renz @RenzTom]

I appreciate the need to stop election fraud but a universal digital ID is the precursor to vax passports and CBDCs. There’s better ways to stop election fraud without risking everyone’s privacy.

[Robert W Malone, MD @RWMaloneMD]

Thank you for your common sense!

[Dominic Michael Tripi @DMichaelTripi]

BREAKING: Rep. Thomas Massie calling on President Trump to halt enforcement of Real ID.

[Mary Talley Bowden MD @MaryBowdenMD]

“REAL ID is more than just a government ID; it’s an unconstitutional usurpation of individual and states’ rights that gives the Secretary of Homeland Security unilateral authority to decide what it must be used for, far beyond access to commercial airlines. It’s a National ID … pushed by state DMVs that want to put it on everyone’s phone where it can be remotely controlled.” @twilabrase

https://t.co/g3XYuQwGUX

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

BREAKING: Congressman Thomas Massie (R-KY) asks President Trump to not enforce “REAL ID” requirement for all American flyers, set for May 7th.

“Real ID isn’t needed and won’t stop terrorists from hijacking planes. Most of the 9/11 hijackers held Saudi, UAE, Egyptian, or Lebanese passports.”

“Real ID is a national standard and database of IDs that is primarily a tool for control of Americans. Trump shouldn’t enforce it.”

[Patrick Webb @Patrickwebb]

BREAKING: Rep. Thomas Massie is calling on President Trump to halt the enforcement of Real ID requirements for domestic air travel, currently set to take effect on May 7th.

Thoughts—should Real ID be repealed?

[Natalie F Danelishen @Chesschick01]

“The REAL ID Act establishes a national ID card by mandating that states include certain minimum identification standards on driver’s licenses. It contains no limits on the government’s power to impose additional standards. Indeed, it gives authority to the Secretary of Homeland Security to unilaterally add requirements as he sees fit.
Supporters claim it is not a national ID because it is voluntary. However, any state that opts out will automatically make non-persons out of its citizens. The citizens of that state will be unable to have any dealings with the federal government because their ID will not be accepted. They will not be able to fly or to take a train. In essence, in the eyes of the federal government they will cease to exist. It is absurd to call this voluntary.”

-@RonPaul

[Sarah Palin @SarahPalinUSA]

Or what??
Evidently existing ID requirements for American citizens just aren’t adequate now, so big brother is forcing us through more hoops for the “right” to travel within our own country. Other administrations delayed this newfangled, burdensome Real ID requirement. Are you curious why its implementation is imperative now?? And who came up with this?

[The Calvin Coolidge Project @TheCalvinCooli1]

🚨New: Thomas Massie is asking President Trump to stop the enforcement of Real ID which will become a requirement for Americans for domestic air travel which takes effect on May 7th

Do you agree with @RepThomasMassie?

[Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie]

Real ID isn’t needed and won’t stop terrorists from hijacking planes.

Most of the 9/11 hijackers held Saudi, UAE, Egyptian, or Lebanese passports.

Real ID is a national standard and database of IDs that is primarily a tool for control of Americans.

Trump shouldn’t enforce it.

[Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie]

Real ID Announcement Receives Wave of Pushback on X

In 2005, President George W. Bush signed the REAL ID Act into law. It was authored by Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis. — the same author of the Patriot Act.
https://t.co/CjZw8LE59J

[Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie]

Hero