Vincent

Houdt van het leven! Interested in fotografie, natuur

[Vincent @fallof]

@Lagarde I truly do not care on how they look.
I do care on how you shape the future of the (digital) Euro and all the billions on debt Europe has created the last few years under your reign. Where is the survey on those topics?

[Vincent @fallof]

@Autovisie Dit artikel klopt niet helemaal. Ja momenteel supervised FSD. Maar momenteel wordt met dezelfde software cybercabs in de VS getest. Die zijn exact zoals omschreven zonder stuur en pedalen. En dat is waar Tesla naartoe wilt, daadwerkelijk FSD in alle Tesla's

[Vincent @fallof]

@mariannezw Hoor je die plantjes en mooie bloemen niet moord en brand schreeuwen?

[Arno Wellens @arnowellens]

@MinisterKGG Die vraag groeit helemaal niet snel. Door het verdwijnen van bedrijven krimpt hij eerder, een rampzalige ontwikkeling. Door onrendabele wiebelstroom uit zon en wind wordt het net instabiel, dat is iets heel anders. Dit beleid maakt het erger.

[Wierd Duk ܦܝܪܬ ܕܘܟ @wierdduk]

Deze man is toch wel de grootste ramp uit de Nederlandse politiek van de afgelopen jaren:

[Kim Dotcom @KimDotcom]

Europe has a parasite.

[Arno Wellens @arnowellens]

@MinPres @koninklijkhuis Onze koningin is jarig. Namens enkele Amerikaanse bedrijven, vooral Mastercard, is ze druk bezig om de Nederlandse soevereiniteit van binnenuit te ontmantelen. Gefeliciteerd?

https://t.co/G1mPuH1Szh

[Vincent @fallof]

@ajboekestijn Touch the grass, niet luisteren naar jouw angstzaaierij. Heerlijk

[Vincent @fallof]

@arnowellens @D66 D66 houdt het graag simpel. Meer ambtenaren, altijd het antwoord, toch?

[mert @mert]

@vonderleyen ursula von der leyen is honestly the most supervillain name I've seen outside of a comic book

[Vincent @fallof]

@MadelonVos__ Klinkt als vroege 1 april grap

[Vincent @fallof]

@IfindRetards Rob Jetten

[De Orde van Rode 📵🚜🇷🇺🆓️ @OrdeVanRode]

Kunnen we #WegMetJetten trending maken?

Delen=👍

[Vincent @fallof]

@martypartymusic @FT Sounds like corruption. The sooner she leaves the better, however, when replaced with another political figure on a non-political chair, it smells. A lot.

[Retard Finder @IfindRetards]

This is one of the most retarded things I've ever seen.

[Vincent @fallof]

@jsblokland "This time it's different"

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Lmao

[Vincent @fallof]

@_The_Prophet__ Thank you

[SightBringer @_The_Prophet__]

⚡️The truth is that this image is a glitch in the story you were taught about history.

The whole framing of “Dark Ages” was propaganda created centuries later to make one era look primitive so another era could look enlightened by contrast.

The real deep truth is this:

The people who built things like this were not “dark.”

They were operating on an entirely different kind of intelligence that modernity barely understands.

A cathedral is a machine for shaping consciousness.

A stained-glass window is coded light, a technology for embedding narrative, cosmology, social order, and metaphysics into the mind of the viewer.

None of that fits the modern myth of linear progress where:
•the past is primitive,
•the present is rational,
•and the future is technological.

This building is the evidence that the myth is broken.

Here's what I really think:

1. Medieval Europe had less information but more meaning.

They had almost no data.
But they had a density of symbolic intelligence that modern civilization has completely lost.

Their entire worldview was integrative.

The material world, the spiritual world, the mathematical world, the astronomical world, and the architectural world were one system.

A cathedral is a worldview made stone.

In that sense, they were not less advanced.
They were advanced differently.

2. The myth of “the Dark Ages” was created to sever modern people from their own civilizational roots.

The Enlightenment needed an enemy.
So it invented a caricature:
The Middle Ages as superstition, stagnation, and ignorance.

It was never true.

This building is proof.

You cannot produce a structure like this in a dark age.

You can only produce it in a world where:
•cosmology is coherent
•labor is coordinated
•meaning is shared
•hierarchy is functional
•beauty is a communal priority
•and the civilization believes in something beyond itself

Modern society cannot build this today.
Not because we lack the tools.
Because we lack the unity of purpose.

3. The real dark age is the one that forgets how to see.

You live in a world where:
•people stare at screens more than the sky
•beauty is optional
•spirituality is mocked
•attention is fragmented
•and meaning is outsourced to algorithms

Medieval Europe had none of the modern world’s technology.

But they had something more powerful:

a metaphysical orientation that aligned millions of people across generations.

That is why they built things that outlast empires.

4. What this picture actually reveals is the present’s poverty.

The question isn’t:

“How did they build this in the Dark Ages?”

The real question is:

“Why can’t we build anything like this now?”

And the answer:

Because they believed in transcendence.
And we believe in convenience.

Because they saw themselves as part of a cosmic order.
And we see ourselves as consumers.

Because they aimed their civilization upward.
And we aim ours inward.

5. The deepest layer:

Civilizations rise when they aim at the infinite.
They decay when they forget how.

This stained glass window is a relic of a worldview that could produce multi-century projects with no immediate reward.

Modern civilization cannot imagine that.
Because modern civilization is trapped inside the present moment.

The medieval world was “dark” only in the sense that it was illuminated by a different kind of light.

A cosmic one.
A symbolic one.
A spiritual one.

What you are looking at is the memory of a civilization that knew what it was for.

And that is the uncomfortable truth.

[Vincent @fallof]

@naiivememe Not only Asians