The biggest mystery is how Shubman Gill was invited to the Royal Box at Wimbledon after being dropped from two T20 World Cups, losing the ODI series against Australia, New Zealand, and England, and getting clean swept by South Africa in Tests at home.
India under Gambhir-Gill in ODIs:
- Lost ODI series Vs Australia 2-1.
- Lost ODI series Vs New Zealand 2-1.
- Won ODI series Vs Afghanistan 3-0.
- Lost ODI series Vs England 2-1.
Ro's done it... now it's Ko''s turn! 🤩🔥
As Virat Kohli brings up his first 50+ score at Lord's across formats, Team India are inching closer to the target! 👊
Will the chase-master guide India to a famous chase?
#ENGvIND 3rd ODI 👉 Streaming LIVE on JioHotstar!
The narrative changed very quickly.
In the 1st ODI, almost every commentator kept talking about Shubman Gill's captaincy. Every field change, bowling change, and decision was credited to the captain, as if captaincy was the defining factor behind the result.
But in the next two ODIs, when things didn't go India's way, the conversation suddenly shifted. There was hardly any discussion about the captaincy. Instead, the entire blame was placed on the bowlers.
So, does captaincy only matter when the team wins? If commentators are going to praise the captain after a victory, they should be equally willing to analyse the captain's decisions when the team loses. That is what consistent and unbiased analysis looks like.
The selective narrative is hard to ignore. It feels like the same lobby that was hyping one individual after the first game has now gone silent, while shifting all the responsibility onto the bowlers.