@maw717@ShawneeMG2 Posting a child likeness online without the parents consent is just wrong, no matter what excuse you make for it.
They are not in public, that store is private property.
@SkyzNyc@ShawneeMG2 Posting a child likeness online without the parents consent is just wrong, no matter what excuse you make for it.
They are not in public, that store is private property.
@TashaMac3@ShawneeMG2 Posting a child likeness online without the parents consent is just wrong, no matter what excuse you make for it.
They are not in public, that store is private property.
@LangmanVince If you can not protect/respect someone else's Freedom, then you do not understand what Freedom truly is.
You might be a a closet communist.
@YeahThatMagic@Rainmaker1973 He cost the guy his eye, scarred his face, and lost $500K. He is a psychopath, and wannabe Jackie Chan, but turned out to be Steven Seagal's clone.
@LBMenefee@amazon You are the worst kind of Karen. And, I hope the Mexicans who built the house you live in pissed on every square inch of it.
And you are trying to get him fired?
Pinckney suffered permanent blindness in that eye (more severe than a general "nasty scar" on the face) and was medically discharged from the U.S. Army. He sued Van Damme, alleging the move was reckless/willful due to Van Damme's known habit of not pulling punches for realism. Van Damme lost the case and was ordered to pay $487,500 in damages (far more than the ~$10k initially sought)
Other stunt performers testified that Van Damme often made excessive contact despite warnings, supporting the "psychopath" characterization in the thread (though courts ruled it reckless). This happened on a lower-budget B-movie-style production, aligning with the post.
@LibbyTard6 Passing lanes are on highways and interstates.
Thru lanes and turn lanes are in towns and cities.
If you did not know that, then you should not be driving.