Small lips, undefined eyebrows, no exaggerated cheekbones, a smile without veneers or teeth that look like they've been washed with dish soap, no false eyelashes, natural hair color. Let's go back to basics.
@focopanama Ah que bien...no? Esa basura humana en lugar de estar preso de por vida o peor, está haciendo nuestras leyes.
¿Y qué piensan de esto las feministas que la pasan solo hablando en los medios? ¿Por qué no hay una ley para inhabilitar de por vida para cargos públicos a estas lacras?
México debería leer con cuidado lo que señala la revista @TheEconomist, y que refiere lo que está pasando en América Latina. No porque venga “la derecha”, sino porque viene algo más peligroso: el político que entiende que el miedo da votos, que la rabia organiza multitudes y que la inseguridad puede convertir a la Constitución en estorbo.
Cuando el ciudadano ve extorsión, homicidios, cobro de piso, desapariciones y fiscalías que no investigan, empieza a escuchar con otros oídos al candidato que promete “orden” sin explicar límites. Ahí nace el riesgo: que la gente, cansada de tanta impunidad, termine pidiendo cárcel, Ejército y castigo antes que pruebas, jueces y debido proceso.
La lección es brutal: si México no construye un Estado que proteja de verdad, tarde o temprano alguien va a ofrecer protección a cambio de libertades. Y ese día el problema ya no será sólo el crimen; será haber entregado la democracia al primer caudillo que supo administrar nuestro miedo.
For those who don't understand what Chevron Deference is, and why SCOTUS ended it, here's the long and short of it:
A family fishing company, Loper Bright Enterprises, was being driven out of business, because they couldn't afford the $700 per day they were being charged by the National Marine Fisheries Service to monitor their company.
The thing is, federal law doesn't authorize NMFS to charge businesses for this. They just decided to start doing it in 2013.
Why did they think they could away with just charging people without any legal authorization?
Because in 1984, in the Chevron decision, the Supreme Court decided that regulatory agencies were the "experts" in their field, and the courts should just defer to their "interpretation" of the law.
So for the past 40 years, federal agencies have been able to "interpret" laws to mean whatever they want, and the courts had to just go with it.
It was called Chevron Deference, and it put bureaucrats in charge of the country.
It's how the OHSA was able to decide that everyone who worked for a large company had to get the jab, or be fired.
No law gave them that authority, they just made it up.
It's how the ATF was able to decide a piece of plastic was a "machine gun".
It's how the NCRS was able to decide that a small puddle was a "protected wetlands".
It's how out-of-control agencies have been able to create rules out of thin air, and force you to comply, and the courts had to simply defer to them, because they were the "experts".
Imagine if your local police could just arrest you, for any reason, and no judge or jury was allowed to determine if you'd actually committed a crime or not. Just off to jail you go.
That's what Chevron Deference was.
It was not only blatantly unconstitutional, it caused immeasurable harm to everyone.
Thankfully, it's now gone.
We haven't even begun to feel the effects of this decision in the courts. It will be used, for years to come, to roll back federal agencies, and we'll all be better of for it.
And that's why politicians and corporate media are freaking out about it.
@ReclaimD1 What does she mean? Attacking, insulting and threatening people on the internet is not the same as doing it in person?!... in real life?! Interesting. 🤔🧐
@Sarahrosasarias Acá todo es "complejo" cuando el sistema está gobernado por gente corrupta, incompetente e intelectualmente pobre. En el 2019 dije que este país no aguantaba 5 años más de lo mismo y ya vimos lo que ocurrió. Ahora vamos en la cresta de otro quinquenio perdido. Apaga y vamonos!