In 2012, a violent radical leftist was someone advocating for violence to overthrow billionaires.
Now anyone who dares to suggest the secret police wear body cams as they assault and murder citizens is branded as such by the state. But sure, go on champ.
No one on the left in 2012 believed in open borders, transing kids, or abolishing the police/prisons.
This is an attempt to rewrite history to hide how quickly you've become radicalized.
It's not working.
I doubt that the second amendment was ever truly in effect in the first place. If the simple act of possessing a firearm can be spun to justify a police shooting, as it has been in many cases, the second amendment is an illusion.
The protester killed in Minnesota was openly armed, which is legal in that state. So if the govt. is going to claim that was a legitimate reason to kill him, then the Trump administration has unilaterally repealed the Second Amendment.
The @BBCNews bias is not towards left or right, and definitely not towards objectivity. Their bias is towards centrism.
Objective reporting would highlight, in the same sentence, that Bovino’s statement is objectively false.
@daveanthony This used to be a thing in many countries, but then they realised that it doesn't actually stop shoplifting and it only pisses people off.
@GnosticKodahn LOL. Reductionist approaches are key to developing the understanding of the universe needed to build the device you use to express that dumb thought.
It's also worth remembering that reducing all complexity down to 'God did it' is also pretty reductionist.
@Grunt2A @BamaBagwell @Bubblebathgirl You should try the math thing… which is the bigger number: 49.6 or 41.6+7.9?
Oh, and don’t look up the latest numbers which will make your “math thing” even easier.
Absolute nonsense like this is why we have grifters telling you to forego actual treatment and instead opt for staring at a screen believing a crude program written in BASIC can actually treat your cancer.
🚨: Quantum physics reveals reality may respond to focus and observation your thoughts could be shaping more than you realise!
On the tiniest scales, the simple act of observation can influence how particles behave a phenomenon known as the observer effect. Some researchers and psychologists draw an inspiring parallel to daily life, suggesting our focus, beliefs, and expectations may subtly influence how we experience reality.
In this view, thoughts are more than passing ideas they’re forms of energy that interact with the world around us. When you focus on growth instead of fear, or potential instead of limitation, your mindset may align with outcomes that reflect those frequencies.
Therapeutic approaches like Matrix Reimprinting explore this link between mind and matter by helping people reframe emotional memories and release stored stress. It’s a space where science, psychology, and energy awareness meet showing that how we perceive the world might just help shape what we live.
@tomix55100@dannycantalk@thunderf00t That’s only a problem if peer review is designed to ensure correctness, but it’s not. Peer review is merely a step intended to weed out the obvious problems and reduce the amount of obvious trash that gets into the literature.