Caught live on our 24/7 Camera BA431 encountered a double tail strike upon landing at Heathrow Airport this morning. What happened here? #aviation#avgeek
The #SupremeCourtPH has clarified that crimes, regardless of which law punishes them, are generally ๐ฎ๐ข๐ญ๐ข ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ด๐ฆโmeaning, proof of criminal intent is required before conviction can be secured. Moreover, in the crime of simulation of birth, a person cannot be separately convicted under two laws for the same act of falsely registering a childโs birth.
ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย
In a Decision written by SC Associate Justice Alfredo Benjamin S. Caguioa, the SC ๐๐ฏ ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ค acquitted Benito A. Somo of simulation of birth under Article 347 of the ๐๐ฆ๐ท๐ช๐ด๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ข๐ญ ๐๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ฆ (RPC) and Section 21(b) of Republic Act No. (RA) 8552, or the ๐๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ด๐ต๐ช๐ค ๐๐ฅ๐ฐ๐ฑ๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐๐ค๐ต ๐ฐ๐ง 1998.
ย
Simulation of birth involves falsely registering a child as the biological child of someone who is not the childโs actual parent, causing the child to lose their true identity and status.
ย
Somo was charged with registering a second birth certificate for his grandson, naming himself and his wife as the childโs parents.
ย
The childโs biological father, who used two different names, had earlier authorized the arrangement in writing to avoid confusion over his sonโs identity. The second birth certificate was used for the childโs school enrollment and passport.
The trial court and the Court of Appeals both found Somo guilty of two separate crimes under the RPC and RA 8552 but the SC explained that Article 347 of the RPC and Section 21 (b) of RA 8552 punish the same crime.
ย
While the RPC penalizes simulation of birth, it does not define the offense or specify how it is committed.ย RA 8552 later clarified the offense by defining simulation of birth as tampering with a childโs birth record in the civil registry.
ย
The SC held that RA 8552 did not create a separate crime but merely clarified an offense already punishable under the RPC. A person cannot be prosecuted or punished twice for the same offense.
In Somoโs case, both charges arose from the same birth certificate, false registration, and claim of parentage.ย
The SC aso held that while simulating birth is inherently wrong because it affect's a child's legal identity, family relationships, and constitutional rights, merely registering a false birth certificate is not enough to establish criminal liability. The prosecution must also prove that the accused intended to cause the child to lose their true identity and status.
In this case, the SC found that although the false registration was established, the prosecution failed to prove criminal intent.
The SC noted that the childโs original birth certificate naming his biological parents remained intact.
The childโs biological father had also authorized the arrangement, while Somo later filed a petition for adoption and correction of the birth record.
Read the full text of the Press Release at https://t.co/lFeGjVpGFN.
Read the full text of the Decision at
https://t.co/K3pZYBX7Kp.
Read the Concurring Opinion of Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen at https://t.co/axCL8tcscg.
Read the Separate Opinion of Associate Justice Amy C. Lazaro-Javier at https://t.co/cbmgNHLKv2.
Read the Dissenting Opinion of Associate Justice Ricardo R. Rosario at https://t.co/YGV46Wrwt5.
Read the Concurring Opinion of Associate Justice Jhosep Y. Lopez at https://t.co/YNHlW90jhf.
Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIOโs Credit Attribution Policy: https://t.co/F48RF1vtzZ.
The #SupremeCourtPH (SC) has clarified the remedies available to borrowers whose properties have been sold through extrajudicial foreclosure. Borrowers may challenge the issuance of a writ of possession or the validity of the foreclosure, but these remedies, including an appeal, do not automatically prevent the purchaser from taking possession of the property.
ย
In a Decision written by Associate Justice Maria Filomena D. Singh, the SCโs Third Division denied the petition filed by spouses Anthony and Ma. Fatima An and upheld the issuance of a writ of possession in favor of Philippine National Bank (PNB).
The spouses took out a PHP 2 million loan and used their property as collateral. When they failed to pay the loan, PNB foreclosed on the mortgage and sold the property at a public auction
ย
PNB was the highest bidder and became the propertyโs owner. When the spouses refused to leave the property, PNB asked the Regional Trial Court (RTC) to issue a writ of possession.
ย
The spouses asserted they regularly made their loan payments and had not been notified of the foreclosure sale. They attempted to redeem the property, but PNB refused, arguing that the spouses had waived their right to redeem the property.
The RTC issued a writ of possession in favor of PNB, which the Court of Appeals upheld.
Affirming the Court of Appealsโ ruling, SC reiterated that a buyer of foreclosed property becomes its absolute owner if the property is not redeemed within one year from the registration of the certificate of sale.
Since ownership had already been transferred to PNB, the RTC had a ministerial duty to issue the writ of possession.
The SC then summarized the remedies available to a debtor-mortgagor (the borrower) in an extrajudicial foreclosure and explained their effect on the writ of possession:
ย
1. ๐๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ผ๐ฑ, ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐พ๐๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฎ๐น ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐: The debtor-mortgagor may file a petition with the same RTC which issued the writ of possession to question the issuance of such writ based on the following grounds:
ย
(a)ย The mortgage was not violated, i.e., the debtor-mortgagor did not miss any payments of the loan; or
(b)ย The foreclosure sale did not comply with the procedural requirements under Act No. 3135.
ย
2. ๐๐ณ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐น๐ฎ๐ฝ๐๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ผ๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ป ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ผ๐น๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ป๐ฎ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ, ๐ฏ๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฒ๐ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฎ๐น ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐:
ย
(a)ย Appeal the order granting the issuance of a writ of possession;
(b)ย File a separate suit for annulment of the mortgage and foreclosure sale.
Applying these rules, the SC held that the RTC had no legal basis to suspend the writโs implementation while the spousesโ appeal was pending. The mere filing of the appeal did not prevent the writ from being enforced.
Read the full text of the Press Release at: https://t.co/EC6SfIMJ8z
Read the full text of the Decision at: โจhttps://t.co/wvxjhinnmUโจโจCopying of this content is subject to the SC PIOโs Credit Attribution Policy: https://t.co/F48RF1vtzZ.
The #SupremeCourtPH En Banc has approved the Revised Rule on the Examination of Child Witnesses (RRECW) on June 17, 2026, introducing new procedures that use technology and child-friendly practices to protect children from further trauma when recounting painful experiences.
Key changes include:
ยท use of videoconferencing
ยท recorded depositions
ยท recorded interviews
ยท technological tools to help children explain what happened
These technological tools are in addition to existing testimonial aids such as dolls, drawings, and puppets.
Courts may allow children to testify via videoconferencing from outside the courtroom if testifying in person is likely to cause them trauma. The court may also limit whom the child can see and hear, including the accused, while preserving the accusedโs constitutional rights, including the right to confront the witness. If the child needs to identify the accused, the accused may briefly turn on the camera, or the child may identify the accused from an image displayed on screen.
If a child cannot testify at trial or via videoconferencing due to a disability, health concerns, or other reasons, the childโs testimony may be taken through an electronically recorded deposition in the presence of the judge and lawyers for both sides. The recording may be used in place of the childโs in-court testimony.
To spare children from having to recount painful experiences and retraumatization, the RRECW encourages and allows a recorded interview with the child by a team of professionals, or its transcript, to be presented as evidence. If the child cannot testify, the recording may be presented instead, provided the interviewer asked neutral, open-ended, age-appropriate, and trauma-informed questions without suggesting answers. If the child testifies at trial, the recording may replace the childโs earlier written statements. All parties must be given a copy and a chance to view the recording, and the interviewer must be present for questioning at trial.
The RRECW applies to children who are victims of crimes, children in conflict with the law, and child witnesses in all criminal, civil, special, and administrative proceedings.
Read the full text of the Press Release at: https://t.co/kDHS1R5cz2
Read the full text of the Resolution in A.M. No. 25-03-23-SC, Revised Rule on the Examination of Child Witnesses at: https://t.co/d5EYRA10aa
๐Broken Arrow, OK - FBI Charged Couple with producing CSAM Material with 2 Year Old.
After a years long investigation, the FBI has announced the arrest of Dakota and Willie Horn, who are both accused of making child sexual abuse material with a 2-year-old child they were babysitting, then putting it on the dark web.
Investigators say after discovering the CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material) on the dark web in 2022, years of digital analysis eventually helped them identify the child victim and the two suspects in Tulsa County.
The FBI says in the videos, the childโs face was visible but the womanโs was not. But, the woman had a distinct tattoo on her arm and wedding ring on her finger.
In 2023, investigators say they found more videos of the same victim being abused by a man with distinct freckles all over his body.
Documents say in one video the child was being sexually abused by the man, and a woman can be heard saying sexual things and when the child starts crying, the woman slaps the child and says โshut up.โ
Investigators say they used the suspects tattoo, ring, a YouTube video playing in the background and other objects in the bedroom to help narrow their search. Investigators say they observed items in the background of the CSAM videos and matched those to pictures on Dakota and Willieโs social media pages.
Investigators say they also used age progression technology and did an open image search on Facebook and Instagram, to identify the child.
The suspects were arrested in Tulsa County at the end of October 2026.
When questioned, Dakota admitted they had babysat the child and admitted she and her ex-husband. Willie Horn, had made the videos and said there was another victim.
When questioned, Willie Horn identified Dakotas tattoos in the videos and other items, but denied knowing anything about child sexual abuse.
Investigators say they arrest and prosecute people all the time who download and possess child sexual abuse material, but they say going after the people who are creating the material is virtual. They say the child sex abuse doesnโt stop after stopping the record button, the victims are re victimized every time someone views the picture or video.
WAGI ANG PINOY
LOOK: Cebu-based photographer Janice Tadoyo took home the grand prize in Scott Kelbyโs 2026 Worldwide Photowalk Contest.
She bested more than 1,000 entries from 202 locations worldwide.
โTadoyo described it as a moment of pure luck, when the subject, light, and composition came together in a split second,โ said the Images Camera Club of Cebu, where she serves as president.
Courtesy: Janice Tadoyo via Scott Kelby/Facebook
The #SupremeCourtPH has ruled that men can also be victims of sexual violence, stressing that the law must protect all victims of abuse regardless of gender.
In a Decision written by Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen, the SC En Banc found a woman guilty of committing acts of lasciviousness against her 11-year-old nephew.
The incident happened while the child was visiting the home of his fatherโs relatives. While the child was asleep, the woman woke him up, ordered him to remove his clothes, and made him lie on her bed. She then engaged in sexual intercourse with him. The child did not protest at first because he was curious about what was happening. But after the incident, he felt ashamed and considered ending his life.
Both the Regional Trial Court and the Court of Appeals found the woman guilty of acts of lasciviousness in relation to Section 5(b) of RA 7610, or the Special Protection of Children Against Abuse, Exploitation, and Discrimination Act.
Before the SC, the woman argued that the child had consented to the sexual act.
The SC disagreed. It explained that at the time of the incident in 2018, the age of sexual consent was 12 years old. Because the child was only 11, he was deemed legally incapable of giving consent.
The SC clarified, however, that the proper offense is statutory acts of lasciviousness under Article 336 of the Revised Penal Code (RPC), not RA 7610.
The SC explained that RA 7610 applies when a minor appears to consent to sexual activity due to the coercion or influence of an adult. It does not apply when a minor is entirely unaware, unconscious, or unable to give legal consent, as in this case.
The SC also noted that the woman was charged with statutory acts of lasciviousness because, at the time of the offense, her acts did not fall within the legal definition of rape under Article 266-A of the RPC. The law then limited the act of rape to a man inserting his penis into a womanโs vagina, as well as the insertion of a penis or any object into another personโs genital.
However, RA 11648, enacted in 2022, expanded the definition of rape, now stating that it may be committed by any person who has carnal knowledge of another person under the circumstances specified by law.
The SC said the use of the term person in the law instead of specifying the perpetratorโs gender allows for the commission of rape even by women.
The SC noted that despite this amendment, some rulings continue to describe rape as a crime committed by men against women. It traced this view to older, patriarchal rape laws that were originally designed not to protect women from violence, but to punish men for taking womenโwho were considered the property of their fathers or husbandsโthrough rape.
The SC held that these beliefs about rape are not only sexist, but also exclude male victims who suffer the same trauma. The failure to recognize that they can be victims of rape can also make it harder for them to realize that they were violated.
The woman was sentenced to prison for nine to 16 years and ordered to pay PHP 250,000 in civil indemnity and damages.
Read the full text of the Press Release at: https://t.co/WDZHQNUw3b
Read the full text of the Decision at: https://t.co/Rcxd8qXqYL
Read the Separate Concurring Opinion of Associate Justice Jhosep Y. Lopez at: https://t.co/m8hEcPQy8X
Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIOโs Credit Attribution Policy: https://t.co/F48RF1vtzZ
He walked out of a British prison dressed as a British naval officer in a uniform he'd had secretly tailored behind bars, and then, back in the war, he beat a more powerful enemy warship by shouting a false order his own crew knew to ignore. His name was Joshua Barney, and he was one of the boldest and most ingenious American sailors of the entire Revolution.
Barney was a Baltimore boy with no education and no connections who went to sea young and threw himself into the naval war the instant it came. He fought in action after action, and the sea war being what it was, he was captured more than once. Eventually the British shipped him across the Atlantic and locked him up in the notorious Old Mill Prison in Plymouth, England, a cold, hungry place where captured American sailors were left to rot, far from any hope of exchange.
Barney refused to rot. From inside the prison, he hatched one of the great escapes of the war. He arranged, somehow, to have a British naval officer's uniform secretly made for him by a tailor. He played a long game, even faking an injury to lull the guards and lower their suspicion. And then, with the help of fellow prisoners and a sympathetic guard, he simply put on the uniform of the enemy and walked out the gate as if he belonged there, a British officer going about his business. He slipped out of England entirely, made his way to France, and from there got himself back home to America and straight back into the fight. The British had caged him, and he had strolled out wearing their own coat.
But his masterpiece came on the water, in April 1782, in Delaware Bay. Barney was given command of the Hyder Ally, a converted merchant ship with a modest sixteen guns, and sent to protect American shipping. There he ran into the British sloop-of-war General Monk, a real warship, better armed and more powerful, exactly the kind of fight a ship like the Hyder Ally was supposed to avoid. Barney took it on anyway, and he won it with a trick.
As the two ships closed and maneuvered, Barney shouted a helm order loud enough for the enemy to hear, deliberately commanding his ship to turn one way. But he had worked out a secret arrangement with his helmsman in advance: the man was to do the exact opposite of whatever Barney shouted. The British, hearing the order, anticipated the turn and adjusted to counter it, and instead Barney's ship went the other way entirely. The maneuver caught the General Monk completely wrong-footed, and the Hyder Ally surged into a position to rake her from bow to stern, pouring devastating fire down the length of the enemy deck. In about half an hour, the more powerful British warship was beaten into surrender. It was one of the cleverest and most celebrated American naval victories of the whole war.
Joshua Barney fought on for the rest of his life, serving at sea in later wars and even commanding a stubborn stand on land against the British decades later, earning the respect of friend and enemy alike. But remember him for the Revolution, for the man who would not stay a prisoner and would not lose a fight he was supposed to lose. He escaped an empire's prison in the empire's own uniform, and he conquered a stronger ship with a single shouted lie. Nerve and cunning were his real weapons, and he had more of both than almost anyone afloat.
Teddy Roosevelt was born 168 years ago today, and his life reads like someone made it up.
As a kid his asthma was so bad he sometimes had to sleep sitting up in a chair just to breathe. He was too sick for regular school, so he was taught at home and spent his time collecting dead animals. At 9 he opened the "Roosevelt Museum of Natural History" in his bedroom. He taught himself taxidermy and the maid complained about the smell.
His father told him he had the mind but not the body, and that he had to make his body. So he did. Boxing, rowing, hiking, lifting, for years.
He went to Harvard, then wrote his first book at 23, a naval history of the War of 1812 that the Navy actually used. He'd go on to write around 35 books and was known to read a book a day, sometimes more.
On Valentine's Day 1884, his mother died of typhoid and his wife Alice died after giving birth to their daughter. Same day. Same house. In his diary he drew a large X and wrote "The light has gone out of my life."
So he went to the Dakota Badlands and became a cattle rancher. Locals mocked the glasses and the Harvard accent until he knocked out a drunk who pulled two pistols on him in a saloon. Later, when thieves stole his boat, he built another one, chased them downriver in the freezing cold, captured all three, and marched them to the nearest jail. He read Anna Karenina while guarding them.
Back in New York he became police commissioner and would walk the streets at night in disguise to catch cops sleeping or drinking on duty.
In 1898 he quit his job as Assistant Secretary of the Navy to lead the Rough Riders in Cuba and charged up Kettle Hill under fire. He was awarded the Medal of Honor for it in 2001, making him the only president to receive one.
At 42, after McKinley was assassinated, he became the youngest president in American history. Weeks in, he invited Booker T. Washington to dinner at the White House, and much of the South lost its mind over it. He didn't apologize.
On a hunting trip in Mississippi, guides tied a black bear to a tree so he could shoot it. He refused. A cartoon ran, a toy maker made a stuffed bear, and that's why it's called a teddy bear.
He put around 230 million acres of land under federal protection. He went down in a submarine. He became the first president to fly in an airplane. He kept boxing in the White House until a punch left him blind in his left eye. He won the Nobel Peace Prize for ending the Russo-Japanese War.
In 1912 a man shot him in the chest outside a Milwaukee hotel. The bullet went through his steel glasses case and a folded 50 page speech in his coat pocket. He coughed into his hand, saw no blood, decided it hadn't hit his lung, and went on stage anyway. He told the crowd "it takes more than that to kill a Bull Moose" and spoke for roughly 90 minutes with a bullet in his chest. Doctors left it in. He carried it the rest of his life.
Two years later, in his mid 50s, he went to map an uncharted river in the Amazon called the River of Doubt. He got an infected leg, a raging fever, and lost about a quarter of his body weight. He nearly died. The river is now named Rio Roosevelt.
When WWI came, all four of his sons went to fight. His youngest, Quentin, a pilot, was shot down and killed over France in 1918. People who knew him said he was never the same.
He died in his sleep a few months later in January 1919, at 60. His son Archie sent a telegram to his brothers: "The old lion is dead." Vice President Thomas Marshall said death had to take him sleeping, because if Roosevelt had been awake there would have been a fight.
#SCphPodcast EXCERPT: What is Mandatory Continuing Legal Education (MCLE) compliance and why is it significant in a lawyer's authority to practice? When can falsifying an MCLE compliance number constitute an offense which would warrant a lawyer's disbarment?
Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Ronald Paz Caraig, Executive Officer of the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education Office (MCLEO). Prior to his appointment as MCLEO Executive Officer, he served in various capacities at the Philippine Judicial Academy (PHILJA), where he was the Chief Judicial Staff Officer of the Publications Division of PHILJAโs Research, Publications and Linkages Office. He is also a resource person and lecturer for various seminars and workshops of the Supreme Court Office of Administrative Services, including those on RA 9710 or the ๐๐ข๐จ๐ฏ๐ข ๐๐ข๐ณ๐ต๐ข ๐ฐ๐ง ๐๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฏ,Gender Sensitivity Training and the ๐๐ข๐ง๐ฆ ๐๐ฑ๐ข๐ค๐ฆ๐ด ๐๐ค๐ต for Supreme Court employees.
Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Caraig discuss the significance of compliance with the MCLE requirement within the context of the case of ๐๐ฏ ๐๐ฆ: ๐๐ช๐ท๐ช๐ญ ๐๐ข๐ด๐ฆ ๐๐ฐ. ๐-10581 ๐ท. ๐๐ต๐ต๐บ. ๐๐ฐ๐ด๐ฆ ๐. ๐๐ช๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐จ๐ฐ, A.C. No. 14311. This ๐๐ฆ๐ณ ๐๐ถ๐ณ๐ช๐ข๐ฎ Decision was promulgated by the Supreme Court ๐๐ฏ ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ค on October 7, 2025.
LISTEN to the FULL episode of this Podcast on
Spotify: https://t.co/bMUSHEHprC
Apple Podcasts: https://t.co/2VsShPYiqE
YouTube: https://t.co/cPbGFZ5W4c
SC website: https://t.co/UwUlZd0Ils