@arisehype Absolutely agree, people see it as the easiest because to truly gain volume is expensive and bears the risk of losing money
I reckon theyโd allocate a decent chunk for LP providers, but unlikely 35% for 20%. Great modelโ
"Hi bros
I just made $27M in 3 days using Openclaw.
Let me share all the details about how I made it here so I can dilute this once-in-a-lifetime not-engagement-bait opportunity"
@crydevil_crypto secondly, I think everything comes together to filter out real and consistent users
from volume to hold time to number of days active and number of trades
this likely follows a real hyperliquid style model.
@crydevil_crypto I assure you that Volume would likely be an important metric, so will many other things
But you definitely have a point about filtering out wash volume and trades that take no directional risk
But sitting back to think high quality volume wont be rewarded is not it.
@frostikkkk Nice way to farm engagement and mislead people
No accounting for coding bugs, competition with other bugs, real life market inefficiencies and the fact that such arb opportunities are even rare.
Nice try lol
@AlejoBlackburn@frostikkkk Thank you!
they keep misleading people with articles
Meanwhile, real life execution is completely different
From the coding bugs to market inefficiencies
Real Polymarket markets have spreads that dont even allow you to find such arb opportunities easily
@KookCapitalLLC I agree, I thought the same thing yesterday when I saw that BasedOneX charges an extra layer of fees
I first thought it was a simple fee split between them from the original Hyperliquid fees, something has to give eventually
No one will keep using 2x extra fees w/o incentives
Over 100 stocks today are up 7.5%+, with a few even up 2x or more
Which is why I believe you should be exposed to both crypto and stonks
A carefully blended mix of both pain and gain