Security findings are inputs.
The release decision is the product.
Fendix connects security evidence, applies release policy, exposes coverage gaps, assigns ownership, and verifies fixes.
See how an evidence-backed release decision works.
https://t.co/tIOvX3GS8c
@MoKhalaf007 Thanks Mohamed 🙏 Curious about your side of it — when your team blocks a release on a security finding, what's usually the thing that makes the call hard? That's the part we're building around.
Fendix is not designed to give you another long vulnerability report.
It is designed to show:
• the release decision
• why the policy reached it
• the supporting evidence
• what needs attention
• whether the fix changed the outcome
A decision — not another inbox.
We’re opening a limited number of 14-day managed Fendix pilots.
Bring one repository and, where applicable, a staging API.
We’ll define the release policy, review the evidence together, and verify selected fixes.
Book a technical walkthrough: https://t.co/Ix9qeNrbAH
How Fendix approaches release security:
Scan — collect security signals
Correlate — connect related evidence
Decide — apply release policy
Verify — confirm what changed after remediation
From disconnected findings to an evidence-backed release decision.
More security findings do not always mean better security decisions.
When SAST, dependency, and API findings arrive as disconnected reports, teams either:
• block releases unnecessarily
• ignore noisy findings
• ship without enough evidence
Fendix is built to close that gap
Security tools find vulnerabilities.
Engineering teams still have to answer the harder question:
Is this release safe to ship?
Fendix correlates security evidence, applies release policy, and returns a clear decision—with the evidence behind it.
https://t.co/Ix9qeNqDL9