The first time ordinary English people could afford to eat meat, Parliament passed a law to stop them.
In 1256 the harvest workers on one Norfolk manor were fed a diet that was 4% meat by value. Most of the rest was bread. The deer belonged to the king, the rabbits to the lord, and the peasant to the pottage.
Then the Black Death killed half the country. Suddenly there were more fields than hands. The survivors could name their price, and they named it in beef.
1351: wages are frozen by law at their level before the plague. Asking for more is a crime, and every village is ordered to build a set of stocks for those who do.
1361: a labourer who leaves his lord for better pay is to be branded on the forehead with an F, for falsehood.
1363: a statute lays down what a servant may eat. Meat or fish once a day and no more.
It held for 30 years. In June 1381 the ploughmen marched on London, took the Tower, and beheaded the Archbishop of Canterbury.
Wat Tyler put their demands to the king in person. An end to serfdom. And every park, warren, river and wood in England thrown open, so that a poor man might take game the same as a rich one.
At St Albans the rebels walked into the abbot's private warren, caught a rabbit, and tied it to the town pillory, as notice that the game was now theirs.
Tyler was stabbed at the meeting. The king, who was 14, took back every promise. Villeins you are, he told them, and villeins you shall remain.
9 years later came the reply to the rabbit.
1390: nobody worth under 40 shillings a year may keep a hunting dog, a ferret or a net, on pain of a year in prison. Parliament wrote its reasoning into the preamble. Labourers had been seen out hunting on holy days like gentlemen, and were using the hunts as cover to meet and plot another rising.
There were plenty of deer. What could not be tolerated was a ploughman with a haunch of venison, because a man who can feed himself can afford to say no.
The laws failed. Hands were too scarce, and by 1424 that same Norfolk manor was feeding its harvesters 28% meat.
The instinct behind the laws has never failed once. Whenever the poor get their hands on meat, somebody important discovers a reason they should not have it. The king's pleasure. The social order. Their cholesterol. The climate.
The reason is replaced every century. The people giving it have never once missed a steak.
I was told to “educate myself” today, here’s some education for you liberal retards, I grew up in a Canada that had the richest middle class in the world, a dollar worth more than the US, you didn’t wait 12hrs in the ER to see a doctor, we didn’t have hundreds of thousands of addicts walking around like zombies stealing everyone’s shit, we didn’t have millions of third world migrants running around stabbing people and shooting up businesses, we had a fiscally responsible government that invested in Canada, people were happy, people got along, young people could easily afford a home and start a family, after a decade of liberal decline, we have out of control immigration, out of control crime,drug use, government spending, corruption on top of corruption, trillions in debt, an insane housing market, insane grocery prices, thousands of deaths every year due to healthcare wait times, a youth unemployment crisis and the worst fucking economy in the G7 and OECD, every single aspect of Canadian life has gone for a complete shit! Yet I need to educate myself? Go fuck yourselves you liberal fucks, you have decimated one of the greatest countries in the world now reduced to a laughing stock and used as an example how not to govern a country.
Dear Muslims: My family and I have decided to move from the US to a Muslim country. We haven't picked which one yet—we're still comparing which one offers the best benefits package.
All my neighbors want to come too. And my neighbors' neighbors. And all their friends. And their friends' friends. Millions of us will show up with suitcases and a sense of entitlement.
As a large Christian community, we'll need a few small changes: Please start building churches immediately. Real churches, with nice loud bells, the kind that can be heard from the town square.
We'll also need for everyone to celebrate Christmas, and to close certain streets once a year for our processions. We may want to gather to pray to our Almighty God on your streets, in your parks, or on the lawns of your mosques.
We'll be an oppressed minority, so you'll have to be understanding and adapt to our way of life. Every supermarket must stock real pork, ham, chorizo, and bacon. And we're bringing all our dogs, so you'll need dog parks, and you'll have to smile tolerate them we walk them in front of your mosques. We want our women to be able to safely go out alone and wear shorts and tank tops. And when the weather's nice, we men like to go shirtless. We also want to drink alcohol, dance, and place an occasional bet at the horse races.
While we're at it, your religious holidays are a bit too much; they could offend the Christian community, so we'd appreciate it if you'd discreetly eliminate them. Thanks.
In schools and workplaces, our children and employees must be able to wear large crucifixes, say prayers, eat ham sandwiches in the cafeteria, and learn Christian principles without anyone getting criticized. We also demand chapels or Christian prayer rooms in every building, plus translators, because we have no intention of learning Arabic.
If any of this is rejected, please send a list of police station addresses so we can report you for discrimination, Christianophobia, racism, and anything we don't like.
One more thing: if my kids protest or burn your flag for any reason, please be understanding. I'll be sure to give them a very serious scolding.
Finally, we all want generous benefits, free housing, phones, free food, and pocket money while we "integrate" over the next three generations. Working is optional, obviously. Be patient with us, you'll get used to it.
We thank you in advance for your tolerance and compassion. After all, diversity is our strength!
Sincerely,
A Very Reasonable Christian
This is complex, however, if you focus on absolutes, no one should be forced to let criminals take whatever they want from anyone. This is fundamental.
Should people be shot for simple theft? I'd say no, but it wasn't the victim who put the criminals there.
Should the onus lie with the criminals to consider the consequences before they put themselves in this situation? Absolutely.
Also, the farmer didn't use force, he demonstrated his potential to use force. So, warning shots are a complicated conversation.
Final absolute; law abiding people should be protected above all others. The system should always side with those who both participate in civil society and pay for it.
Without all the particulars of this situation, it's difficult to analyze it in detail.
@VoiceOfFranky Would it be called Lying For The Liberals? Or something like I only poll senior Liberals with a mental disorder. How will you prop up the Liberal party and are they sponsoring?