ferryhusnil

[ferryhusnil @ferryhusnil07]

@betellgeeuse crazy

[ferryhusnil @ferryhusnil07]

brain draining AI google team, and all of this happen where I started buying their stock

[John Jumper @JohnJumperSci]

A bit of news: After nearly 9 years, I have decided to leave Google DeepMind and join Anthropic (after taking some time to recharge). I am incredibly grateful for my time at GDM. @demishassabis took a real chance letting me lead the AlphaFold team just six months after finishing my PhD, and the entire GDM team taught me so much about how to do great science. GDM is a special place, and I’ll still be excited to hear about what amazing things they discover next.

[ferryhusnil @ferryhusnil07]

@0xAllain ajarin puh

[Tirii @tirii_f1]

MAX IS SAVING F1 ONE DAY AT A TIME

While others chase hybrid gimmicks and soundless EVs, Max is out here commanding the future like a battlefield general. Look at these 2026-2028 regs he’s basically forcing through:

🔹Internal Combustion Engine
-Max power: 400kW → 420kW → 450kW
-Fuel flow increase: +5% → +13%MGUK
-Max power Overtake Mode stays strong at 350kW
🔹Harvesting power climbing to 400kW
Power split shifting back toward ICE glory: 53/47 → 58/42 → 60/40

Real power. Real noise. Proper racing.
Max isn’t just winning on track, he’s dragging Formula 1 back to its soul, one regulation table at a time. The hybrid era tried to neuter the V6s. Max said: “Not on my watch.”

General Verstappen, we salute you. 🫡

[Verstappen News @verstappenews]

P2 FOR MAX VERSTAPPEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AT MONACO!! JUST +0.043 BEHIND ANTONELLI

LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[ferryhusnil @ferryhusnil07]

@halfaergia @0xAllain nt, dapat waitlist doang

[ferryhusnil @ferryhusnil07]

@0xAllain bisa baca ini untuk detailnya

[Justin Drake @drakefjustin]

Today is a monumentous day for quantum computing and cryptography. Two breakthrough papers just landed (links in next tweet). Both papers improve Shor's algorithm, infamous for cracking RSA and elliptic curve cryptography. The two results compound, optimising separate layers of the quantum stack. The results are shocking. I expect a narrative shift and a further R&D boost toward post-quantum cryptography.

The first paper is by Google Quantum AI. They tackle the (logical) Shor algorithm, tailoring it to crack Bitcoin and Ethereum signatures. The algorithm runs on ~1K logical qubits for the 256-bit elliptic curve secp256k1. Due to the low circuit depth, a fast superconducting computer would recover private keys in minutes. I'm grateful to have joined as a late paper co-author, in large part for the chance to interact with experts and the alpha gleaned from internal discussions.

The second paper is by a stealthy startup called Oratomic, with ex-Google and prominent Caltech faculty. Their starting point is Google's improvements to the logical quantum circuit. They then apply improvements at the physical layer, with tricks specific to neutral atom quantum computers. The result estimates that 26,000 atomic qubits are sufficient to break 256-bit elliptic curve signatures. This would be roughly a 40x improvement in physical qubit count over previous state-of-the-art. On the flip side, a single Shor run would take ~10 days due to the relatively slow speed of neutral atoms.

Below are my key takeaways. As a disclaimer, I am not a quantum expert. Time is needed for the results to be properly vetted. Based on my interactions with the team, I have faith the Google Quantum AI results are conservative. The Oratomic paper is much harder for me to assess, especially because of the use of more exotic qLDPC codes. I will take it with a grain of salt until the dust settles.

→ q-day: My confidence in q-day by 2032 has shot up significantly. IMO there's at least a 10% chance that by 2032 a quantum computer recovers a secp256k1 ECDSA private key from an exposed public key. While a cryptographically-relevant quantum computer (CRQC) before 2030 still feels unlikely, now is undoubtedly the time to start preparing.
→ censorship: The Google paper uses a zero-knowledge (ZK) proof to demonstrate the algorithm's existence without leaking actual optimisations. From now on, assume state-of-the-art algorithms will be censored. There may be self-censorship for moral or commercial reasons, or because of government pressure. A blackout in academic publications would be a tell-tale sign.
→ cracking time: A superconducting quantum computer, the type Google is building, could crack keys in minutes. This is because the optimised quantum circuit is just 100M Toffoli gates, which is surprisingly shallow. (Toffoli gates are hard because they require production of so-called "magic states".) Toffoli gates would consume ~10 microseconds on a superconducting platform, totalling ~1,000 sec of Shor runtime.
→ latency optimisations: Two latency optimisations bring key cracking time to single-digit minutes. The first parallelises computation across quantum devices. The second involves feeding the pubkey to the quantum computer mid-flight, after a generic setup phase.
→ fast- and slow-clock: At first approximation there are two families of quantum computers. The fast-clock flavour, which includes superconducting and photonic architectures, runs at roughly 100 kHz. The slow-clock flavour, which includes trapped ion and neutral atom architectures, runs roughly 1,000x slower (~100 Hz, or ~1 week to crack a single key).
→ qubit count: The size-optimised variant of the algorithm runs on 1,200 logical qubits. On a superconducting computer with surface code error correction that's roughly 500K physical qubits, a 400:1 physical-to-logical ratio. The surface code is conservative, assuming only four-way nearest-neighbour grid connectivity. It was demonstrated last year by Google on a real quantum computer.
→ future gains: Low-hanging fruit is still being picked, with at least one of the Google optimisations resulting from a surprisingly simple observation. Interestingly, AI was not (yet!) tasked to find optimisations. This was also the first time authors such as Craig Gidney attacked elliptic curves (as opposed to RSA). Shor logical qubit count could plausibly go under 1K soonish.
→ error correction: The physical-to-logical ratio for superconducting computers could go under 100:1. For superconducting computers that would be mean ~100K physical qubits for a CRQC, two orders of magnitude away from state of the art. Neutral atoms quantum computers are amenable to error correcting codes other than the surface code. While much slower to run, they can bring down the physical to logical qubit ratio closer to 10:1.
→ Bitcoin PoW: Commercially-viable Bitcoin PoW via Grover's algorithm is not happening any time soon. We're talking decades, possibly centuries away. This observation should help focus the discussion on ECDSA and Schnorr. (Side note: as unofficial Bitcoin security researcher, I still believe Bitcoin PoW is cooked due to the dwindling security budget.)
→ team quality: The folks at Google Quantum AI are the real deal. Craig Gidney (@CraigGidney) is arguably the world's top quantum circuit optimisooor. Just last year he squeezed 10x out of Shor for RSA, bringing the physical qubit count down from 10M to 1M. Special thanks to the Google team for patiently answering all my newb questions with detailed, fact-based answers. I was expecting some hype, but found none.

[ferryhusnil @ferryhusnil07]

@0xAllain jadi sepemahamanku, inti papernya itu kasih solusi impelementasi shor algorithm yang jauh lebih efisien. tapi bukan berarti sudah practical, karena quantum computer yang ada saat ini masih kecil size nya

[ferryhusnil @ferryhusnil07]

at this point, why bother subscribe to other AI tools

[Claude @claudeai]

You can now enable Claude to use your computer to complete tasks.

It opens your apps, navigates your browser, fills in spreadsheets—anything you'd do sitting at your desk.

Research preview in Claude Cowork and Claude Code, macOS only.

[ferryhusnil @ferryhusnil07]

@0xAllain @uibaseNG cryptography, not cryptocurrency

[Kakashi @kkashi_yt]

Trying to comfort your friend after you convinced him to buy Bitcoin at $120K

[ferryhusnil @ferryhusnil07]

@NoLimitGains @grok find NoLimit post that told to sold BTC at $126k

[ferryhusnil @ferryhusnil07]

100x productivity

[Naruto11.eth @naruto11eth]

just installed ClawdBot

i did basic onboarding and left it alone. in just 8 hours:

> it cleared all my emails
> booked flights to ethcc and airbnb
> installed hinge and bought its premium sub
> learned my preferences of women
> matched me with 4 amazing ladies
> chatted with them, did reservation for 4 different days in 4 different restaurants
> told me what to wear, what to take as a gift, where to pick date #1, told me what conversations to have
> told me her expectations
> at the end says, "best of luck kid"

clawd bot is the best wingman your homie could never be.

[ferryhusnil @ferryhusnil07]

seems reasonable plan, apakah saatnya??

[Alex Finn @AlexFinn]

@akassab give your clawdbot access to cheaper models that Opus can spin up subagents with to take care of tasks. It regularly spins up my ChatGPT Pro plan to take care of some smaller things

[ferryhusnil @ferryhusnil07]

bro all my X feeds now are about clawdbot and mac mini

[ferryhusnil @ferryhusnil07]

abu dhabi will be crazy

[ferryhusnil @ferryhusnil07]

@DeltaKrst @0xAllain sorry for late response, baru ke notice

https://t.co/h6TdT1Uv1X

[ferryhusnil @ferryhusnil07]

barber apa ini dawg, semua yang dateng bawa pacar

[ferryhusnil @ferryhusnil07]

ABSOLUTE CINEMA

[Formula 1 @F1]

BREAKING: Both McLaren cars of Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri have been disqualified from the Las Vegas Grand Prix

This is because the thickness of the rearmost skid of both cars was less than the required thickness

#F1 #LasVegasGP

[ferryhusnil @ferryhusnil07]

@0xAllain ayo