@WhyBitcoinJ @Chris_313@crypt0e@RyanSAdams If you want to do anything useful with your BTC you have to use centralized entities because of Bitcoin's lack of features
Bitcoiners are pushing themselves into centralized entities
@antiprosynth I think it was always clear it meant Ethereum, then Ethereum L1, but now I see it more and more for "the production network you're using (eg Arbitrum One Mainnet)
@0xngmi did you just add it today? I literally searched for 0x in the search bar this morning and wondered why we almost never see them anywhere
telepathic llama adding features in real time
@toghrulmaharram That would very helpful, it's difficult when you're new & don't have the references to figure what what happened when between the different forums, eips, etc
@MikeCautillo@smolgrrr@CarlBMenger Yes, you can run an ethereum node just like you run a bitcoin node, the 32 eth is to become a solo validator (equivalent of miner in btc), arguably cheaper than becoming a miner btw
Maxis are just lying to you, nothing new
https://t.co/heLXyIfuGL
You *do not* need 32 ETH to run a fully validating Ethereum node ⚠️
All you need is consumer grade hardware.
Next time you hear this misinformation, share this clip from @sassal0x 👇🏻
https://t.co/gr32AOyQTP
@StormkingdotETH@MondoMegaman@knlae_ I think Satoshi intended for the network usage to be so big at some point that TXs fees would secure the network
Problem is, bitcoin governance (a few years after Satoshi left) decided to make it nearly impossible to grow network usage by limiting the block size
@tx4614731337 @AdrianoFeria@SmartBCH It's currently an L1 sidechain of BCH
But I could see it becoming an L2 settling on Ethereum; at least the execution part (their EVM)