"Football" was originally a category label for a whole family of ball games played on foot by common people - as opposed to games played on horseback, like polo. Handling the ball was allowed in many of these folk games; the defining feature was that you were on your feet.
By the 19th century, English schools had wildly divergent versions of "football," and they eventually split into codes: association football (1863), rugby football (1871), and later Australian rules football, Gaelic football, and so on. Each kept "football" in the name because they were all branches of the same tree.
American football grew out of the rugby branch. Harvard played a rugby-style game against McGill in 1874, other colleges adopted it, and then Walter Camp introduced the line of scrimmage, downs, and set plays through the 1880s. The sport mutated dramatically, but nobody renamed it - it was already "football."
Kicking was also far more central early on. Field goals were worth more than touchdowns for a while, and teams routinely punted on early downs as a strategy rather than a concession. The foot mattered a lot more than it does now.
The genuinely funny part: "soccer" is a British coinage. It comes from clipping "association" (assoc → soc) and adding the Oxford "-er" suffix, the same way "rugger" came from rugby. Brits used it widely for decades and only abandoned it once it started sounding American.
Hear me out: FIFA should let every team on Earth into the World Cup
-Start with geographically based groups
-Spread the matches out over 2.5-3 years
-Have the top 32 or 48 teams from those groups meet in a single country for one last tournament to determine the winner
Thoughts?
Ashamed? We feel many things watching Argentina march to the semifinals, but shame is not on the list. You have spliced a penalty box scramble, a "no VAR check," and a Negreira banner into one grand conspiracy, which is a lot of production value for a team that won 3-1 fair and square. Save the outrage for the England semi. You will need it. Objectively unbothered. 🟨🟥
#WorldCup2026 #StayObjective #VAR #FIFA26
We have reviewed it and reached the only sane verdict: penalty England should never have existed, red card for the dive, another red for the intent to injure, and frankly a lifetime ban for making us look. Yes, all three at once. Yes, from one tackle. The laws of the game bow to our mood, and our mood is Norway. Objectively corrected. 🟨🟥
#NORENG #WorldCup2026 #StayObjective #VAR
For this World Cup only, yes, so dry your eyes. FIFA forced it on all 104 matches like a toddler who discovered a new toy, and UEFA took one look and said absolutely not at our Euros. Enjoy the quarter-time laptop seminars and the six ad breaks they smuggle in, because come 2028 the grown-ups are taking the whistle back. Limited-time American import, batteries and integrity not included. Objectively temporary. 🟨🟥
#WorldCup2026 #StayObjective #VAR #FIFA26
We reviewed it. Arm was in a natural position, ball came from close range, and, most importantly, we were not in a giving mood. Belgium have had their VAR miracle this tournament, at Senegal's expense, and the account is now closed. Down 2-1, out of shouts, out of time. Objectively denied. 🟨🟥
#ESPBEL #WorldCup2026 #StayObjective #VAR
Belgium just got Senegaled. The very team that knocked Senegal out on a 124th minute VAR penalty, the longest review of the tournament, has been dumped by an 88th minute Spanish winner. Live by the late goal, die by the late goal. The football gods keep a ledger, and today they collected. Objectively poetic. 🟨🟥
#ESPBEL #WorldCup2026 #StayObjective #VAR