Has @GovSherrillNJ taken to heart the decision in First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport, 608 U.S. ___ (2026) (No. 24-781) where the NJ AG tried to force the pro life organization to produce their donor lists? Or no?
@AAGDhillon
Today, I informed @AAGDhillon that New Jersey will not provide the personal information of thousands of New Jersey residents.
The request had no legal basis, and I will always protect New Jerseyans' personally identifiable information.
@RepRickCrawford nice spot on @FoxNews this morning, but really need the name and manufacturer of the tile backsplash your kitchen! It’s exactly what I need to finish our project.
@yashar This support is all well and good but is meaningless unless their treasure and citizens are placed on the line to defend Ukraine as the United States is expected to do without hesitation.
@TheTubby2024@ProfMJCleveland Probably us through USAID grants pre freeze. I think there is evidence of several groups led by Marc Elias(sp?) the attorney planning this assault.
@Macrina_W@TheMorningSpew2@WallStreetApes Level of care is driven not only by the procedure and/or admitting diagnosis, but also by other conditions a patient may have which increases the risks to the patient. Diabetes & heart disease for ex. not aware of what the evidence based guidance is for this procedure.
@Macrina_W@TheMorningSpew2@WallStreetApes Reimbursement to the hospital and potentially costs to patient. Observation is an “outpatient” level of care which usually means larger out of pocket costs to the patient and reduced payment to the hospital. It is an illusion created by payors.
@elonmusk If you have a moment, my daughter would like a word about Starlink use “in motion”.
Check out abby b | solo travel 🚐✈️🎒's video! #TikTok https://t.co/FSKRMDFWTT
@panerabread what is happening with the cafe in O’Fallon MO on Highway K? 45 minutes from online order until order handed to me in the drive thru. No way to cancel the order readily apparent either. Hope this isn’t some new service standard.
This whole string with Bret Stephens is exactly what is concerning to me, and probably others too.
I don’t blindly follow anyone - you need to do more than slap your name on a ballot, attack your opponent’s policies and say vote for me to get my vote.
Bret Stephens asks Stephanie Ruhle why Kamala Harris has not done interviews and stated clearly what her policy positions are. Ruhle responds that 'We don't live in Nirvana':
Bret Stephens: "I'm an undecided voter. I'm not sure I want to vote for Kamala. My fear is that she doesn't really have a very good command of what she wants to do as president.
It would be great for her to sit down with you, or George Stephanopoulos, or you Stephanie.
It's not too much to ask Kamala 'Are you for a Palestinian state, if Hamas is going to run that state?'"
Stephanie Ruhle: "If you don't like her answer, are you going to vote for Trump? Kamala Harris is not running for perfect, she is running against Trump.
We have two choices. There are some things that you might not know her answer too.
In 2024, we know exactly what Trump will do, who he is, and the kind of threat he is to democracy."
Bret Stephens: "The problem that a lot of people have with Kamala is that we don't know her answer to anything."
Ruhle: "But you know his answer to everything."
Stephens: "People also are expected to have some idea of what the program that you're supposed to vote for.
I don't think it's a lot to ask for her to sit down for a real interview."
Ruhle: "When you move to Nirvana, I'll be your next door neighbor. We don't live there."
Stephanie Ruhle thinks it's 'utopian' to demand Kamala Harris go through the process that every other candidate for president has gone through, a public vetting process.
Turns out, Stephanie Ruhle and her ilk are the true 'threats to democracy'.
Maybe we should offer periodic refresher courses in American civics or perhaps bring back the original Schoolhouse Rocks episode about the three branches of government? What do you think?
The Supreme Court overruled 40 years of precedent and overturned the Chevron decision. It makes judges and the Supreme Court the regulators of laws passed by Congress rather than the scientific expertise at federal agencies. This is not democracy but rule by judicial order. The only beneficiaries are big business and polluters.
How did we get to the point that people believe the POTUS should be involved in our children’s child care costs? Get out of the way and let the economy grow. #Debates2024
@SouthwestAir how ridiculous is it that after a multiple hour delay due to weather that our bags are not with us and the phone number I have called twice has disconnected me and the recommended online form failed to work also?
@BarstoolMizzou Hard Eight BBQ - best selection of smoked meats in Dallas. Torchys Tacos. Second Babes Chicken recommendation. Streets Chicken. Heims BBQ. If you like fish/seafood - Flying Fish is awesome.
So the root cause of the death of this child was due to a lack of anti bullying posters and no way to report the bullying of the student? The accompanying story doesn’t support that conclusion - the millions of dollars paid to the family doesn’t support that conclusion either.
The family of a 13-year-old boy who died after two of his classmates attacked him at lunch will receive a $27 million settlement from a Southern California school district, according to the family's attorneys. https://t.co/sbpAPuXJLL
What has the school district done to determine how this child was essentially murdered at school by his classmates?
Or did they pay some nonsense fine, fire sacrificial personnel, throw up a poster and an online reporting portal and consider it all solved?