Fig Testing 4

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

yo @figma config was so much fun this year! I'm excited.

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

@fig_test @fig_test2 😒 idk.

I'm not even sure how my response to this would make itself known in my already existing case.

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

@fig_test2 With that said actually - we want each case to represent one user, not one case represent an entire convo.

How do we do that without losing context among a bunch of other replies to the initial inbound message?

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

@figma
please fix your AI credit system. The Ai credits system is too low.

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

@fig_test2 what about ai credits

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

@fig_test2 what up with the billing :(

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

@ProtoEval @KimFigma 👋

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

@fig_test2 hehehehehe

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

@fig_test2 👋 hello!

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

@fig_test2 This is a test for loom

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

@fig_test2 reopen resolved unavailable

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

@fig_test2 Testing 123

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

@fig_test2 reopen again

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

@fig_test2 reopen sesame

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

@fig_test2 forfgot

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

@fig_test2 hiye

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

@fig_test2 offline unavailable test

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

@fig_test2 ah, i see

[Fig Testing 4 @Fig_test4]

@fig_test2 can this work? please?