AC

[Yogi Adityanath @myogiadityanath]

संघर्ष की संस्कृति, संकल्प की सजीव परंपरा और संग्राम के साक्षात स्वरूप, महापराक्रमी महाराणा सांगा जी की जयंती पर उन्हें कोटि-कोटि नमन!

शरीर पर गंभीर अस्सी घावों के बावजूद स्वदेश, स्वधर्म, स्वाभिमान की रक्षा हेतु आपका आजीवन असाधारण संघर्ष हम सभी के लिए प्रेरणा है।

आपका बलिदानी जीवन हमें स्मरण कराता है कि जो स्वत्व और सम्मान के लिए अडिग रहता है, उसकी चेतना कभी पराजित नहीं होती है।

[AC @figuringoutttt]

@Astro_Panditji_ 24-10-1993

[AC @figuringoutttt]

@Astro_Panditji_ October 24th, 1992

[Amy Mek @AmyMek]

If only Charlie Kirk would have remained silent
If only Charlie Hebdo had not drawn cartoons
If only Samuel Paty hadn't taught his students
If only Salman Rushdie would not have written a book
If only Theo van Gogh would not have made a film
If only Lars Vilks had not done an illustration
If only Geert Wilders would stay out of politics
If only Mila did not use social media
If only Nupur Sharma did not mention Aisha
If only Kurt Westergaard stopped drawing
If only Rasmus Paludan respected the Qur'an
If only Lars Hedegaard stopped writing
If only Avijit Roy had stopped blogging
If only Jacques Hamel had not been a Catholic Priest
If only Mahsa Amini had covered herself
If only Ahmad Abu Marhia had liked women
If only Saman Abbas had been less Westernized
If only Sarah Halimi had not been Jewish
If only young Lola and Luna did not leave their homes
If only Andreas Jurca were not a politician in the AfD
If only Robert Redeker did not share his opinions
If only Robert Spencer did not go to Ireland
If only Pamela Geller didn't organize a cartoon contest
If only Bosch Fawstin did not “Draw Muhammad”
If only Michael Stürzenberger had not spoken in public

“If only”...then we could live in “peace,” right!?

If only we submit to the Left and to Islam, then we would be “safe,” right?

The Truth Behind “Peace”

In both Islam and the modern Left, peace does not mean coexistence - it means complete submission.

Their “tolerance” extends only to those who accept humiliation and live under their ideological rule.

Muhammad demanded war against all who rejected him. Within 25 years of his death, Muslim armies had overrun vast Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist, and Zoroastrian lands—territory spanning what would become more than 28 modern nations. For 1,400 years jihad continued, and to this day, not a week passes without Islamic fundamentalists killing in the name of Allah.

Muhammad himself declared: “I have been ordered to fight until they testify there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger.” In the last nine years of his life, he ordered no fewer than 65 military campaigns to enforce it. He inspired his men with promises of loot, slaves, women, and a lust-filled paradise. He beheaded captives, raped women, and enslaved children—and Muslims are still told to emulate his example.

The modern Left, rooted in communism, mirrors the same logic: stay silent, conform, bend the knee - or be destroyed. Communists slaughtered over 100 million people in the 20th century under the same justification: history had a “destined course,” and anyone who stood in its way had to be silenced, reeducated, or eliminated.

Today’s progressives dress it up with softer words - “equity,” “inclusion,” “justice” - but the reality is the same forced obedience. Dissent is crushed, speech is censored, and anyone refusing to submit is socially, politically, or financially destroyed.

Islam calls it peace. Communism calls it progress. Both mean submission.

So the question is… Who will be added to this list next?

[The Cinéprism @TheCineprism]

Didn't expect it to be this deep 🎧
https://t.co/1lemX12ifH

[Nick Collins @nickcollins1953]

Circa 3000BC

• Egypt had one river
• Mesopotamia had two
• Northwest India had seven huge rivers & tributaries from which canals were constructed

Conventional history says Mesopotamia was the cradle of civilisation.

Archaeology logic & common sense suggests it was India.

[Chota Don @choga_don]

No Indian could have said it better than this Bengali Teacher

[Aditya Raj Kaul @AdityaRajKaul]

“If Pakistan escalates it, we have really the capacity to punish them harder”

- India’s Top Diplomat Vikram Doraiswami

[Shiv Aroor @ShivAroor]

The IMF is a sponsor of terrorism.

[Ajeet Bharti @ajeetbharti]

मुझे व्यक्तिगत तौर पर जातिगत जनगणना से न लाभ है, न हानि। कभी भी सरकारी नौकरी न की, न करूँगा। सवर्ण हूँ और सदैव प्रतिभा के बल पर अग्रणी रहा हूँ, तो किसी और को आरक्षण नब्बे प्रतिशत भी हो जाए, तब भी मैं अपने जीवन में ‘बहुत अच्छा’ ही कर रहा होता।

पर, जब इसे मैं समाज में, इसके व्यापक प्रभाव को देखता हूँ, तब समस्या होती है। जातिगत जनगणना केवल गिनती मात्रा नहीं है, न ही यह ‘नीति निर्धारण’ का मार्ग है। हमें यह समझना होगा कि यह निर्णय विपक्ष के दवाब में और अपने टूटते वोट शेयर के कारण भाजपा को लेना पड़ा है।

विपक्ष के दवाब में पहले भी निर्णय वापस हुए हैं, स्थगित हुए हैं, अनिश्चित काल तक लटकाए गए हैं। किसान कानून, CAA, NRC इसका उदाहरण हैं।

यह जब पैटर्न बन रहा हो तो हमें चिंतित होना चाहिए। इस आँकड़े को आप इसकी स्वतंत्रता में मत देखिए क्योंकि ये केवल डेटा है। इसकी उपयोगिता इसके क्रियान्वयन में है। वो क्या-क्या है?

१. यही भाजपा सरकार, इसी संख्या को आधार बना कर 2029 से पहले, 50% आरक्षण की सीमा को संविधान संशोधन के माध्यम से तोड़ेगी। यह प्रतिशत 65+10 तक जा सकता है।

२. इसी आँकड़े के प्रयोग से निजी क्षेत्र में, आरंभिक अवस्था में, 10% की DEI जैसी हायरिंग आरक्षित कर दी जाएगी। इसे प्रयोगात्मक तौर पर भाजपा शासित राज्यों में आरंभ कर के, राष्ट्रव्यापी किया जाएगा।

३. संभवतः, इससे उपजी निराशा को काउंटर करने के लिए मुस्लिम जातियों को भी आरक्षण से जोड़ा जाएगा और आपको कहा जाएगा कि भीम-मीम एकता में सेंधमारी है।

४. हर राज्य में ‘जितनी आबादी, उतना हक’ की बात को तूल दी जाएगी और राज्य सरकार की नौकरियों में आनुपातिक प्रतिनिधित्व करने को चुनावी विषय बना कर, अंततः सरकार से लागू कराया जाएगा। इसे कोई भी सरकार वापस नहीं ले सकेगी।

सावरकर को इतना डिफेंड करने वाली सरकार यदि ‘डील’ कर के इस स्थिति में पहुँच गई है, तो धिक्कार है इसके हिन्दुत्ववादी होने पर। भाजपा एक ऐसी राष्ट्रीय पार्टी है जो घनघोर जातिवादी होती जा रही है। इसे अपने नाम के ब्रेकेट में ‘अम्बेडकरवादी’ लिख लेना चाहिए। इससे इसके समर्थकों में निराशा का भाव नहीं आएगा।

यह केवल दुर्भाग्य है कि इसे डिफेंड किया जा रहा है। और जो विरोध कर रहे हैं, उनका सर्टिफिकेट कैंसल किया जा रहा है। करते रहो कैंसल। मैंने बहुत पहले कहा था कि यही भाजपा राहुल गाँधी के हर मुद्दे को पारित करेगी, और ऐसा करने के बाद भी, इसका क्रेडिट उसे नहीं मिलेगा।

[Incognito @Incognito_qfs]

Even if you are not part of the Indian Defence forces....you can still contribute & fight against the 0.5 front operating against India from within India. 🙏

[RadioGenoa @RadioGenoa]

Islamic terrorist attack in Kashmir, India with over 30 victims and many injured. Where there is Islam there can be no peace, as past and recent history demonstrates.

[BALA @erbmjha]

110% Truth!

There was no need to conduct elections in Kashmir after the abrogation of Article 370, the region needed to remain under the control of the central govt.

Judges need to be more mindful when making decisions that could go against the interests and lives of our people.

Brave and much needed that someone dared to speak the obvious.

#Pahalgam #PahalgamTerroristAttack

[Amitabh Agnihotri @Aamitabh2]

भारत में हिन्दू होने पर गोलियों से भून दिया जाए तो इससे अधिक दुखद और क्या होगा ---पहलगाम में धर्म के आधार पर नरसंहार हुआ है ,यह सच दुनिया भर को मानना ही पड़ेगा ---

[Mr Sinha @Mrsinha]

Brilliant... #PahalgamTerroristAttack

[AC @figuringoutttt]

#PahalgamTerroristAttack #Pahalgam

[Vice-President of India @VPIndia]

An event had taken place recently on the release of a book, and the focus of the book by a former judge of the Supreme Court was on the Basic Structure. The day was chosen as 14th April, associated with Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. The author of the book, referred to 13th April. He narrated an incident that had taken place on 13th April at Jallianwala Bagh before independence, where our people were killed and massacred by our own people led by General Dyer. Then he came to the Doctrine of Basic Structure and said that this cannot happen now because of this doctrine.

Examine for a moment this doctrine, Keshavanand Bharti gave to us. 13 judges of the Supreme Court assembled, the division was vertical 7:6, it can't be more than that. The judgement was on 24th April 1973 and this according to the author is our saviour. But after we had this basic structure doctrine, a Prime Minister to save her seat, imposed emergency on 25th June 1975. It was supposed to be engaging discourse, inquisitorial, no one asked a question कि यह जो अवतार था, यह जो अमृत था जो ऐसी घटनाओं पर अंकुश लगा देगा और जिसका इतना महिमामंडन किया जा रहा था जालियाँवाला बाग के reference में, वह भूल गए ताज़ा इतिहास को। 24th April 1973 और आप देखिए दो साल पूरे होते ही Emergency was clamped.

Lakhs of people were put behind the bars and it was upto until 21st March 1977. With this basic structure, the Supreme Court ruled, you have no fundamental right during emergency.

The impregnability of basic structure was demolished to pieces by the Highest Court of the land, reversing, judgements of 9 High Courts that in one voice held, Fundamental Rights cannot be on hold during Emergency.

There has to be access to Judiciary, highest court of land. A former judge being author of the book, eulogising the doctrine, the complete bulwark against assault on citizen rights, was so oblivious of what happened during his lifetime. #RajyaSabha

[Vice-President of India @VPIndia]

President of India is a very elevated position. President takes oath to preserve, protect and defend the constitution. This oath is taken only by the President and the Governors.

If you look at the Indian Constitution, the President is the first part of the Parliament. Second and third are Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha.

Recent there was a directive to the President, by a recent judgement. Where are we heading? What is happening in the country? We have to be extremely sensitive. It is not a question of someone filing a review or not. We never bargained for this.

President being called upon to decide in a time-bound manner, and if not, it becomes law. So we have judges who will legislate, who will perform executive functions, who will act as super Parliament, and absolutely have no accountability because law of the land does not apply to them.

Every Parliamentarian, and every candidate in any election to assembly or Parliament is required to declare assets. They just don't do it. Some do, some don't. #RajyaSabha

[Vice-President of India @VPIndia]

Not for a moment will I ever say that we must not give premium to innocence. Democracy is nurtured, its core values blossom, and human rights are taken at a high pedestal when we believe in innocence till the guilt is established. Therefore, I must not be misunderstood as casting aspersions on any individual. But then, in a democratic nation, purity of its criminal justice system defines its direction. Investigation is required. No investigation under law is in progress at the moment.

Because for a criminal investigation, the initiation has to be by an FIR—First Information Report. It is not there. It is the law of the land that every cognizable offence is required to be reported to the police. And failure to do so—failure to report a cognizable offence—is a crime. Therefore, you all will be wondering why there has been no FIR.

The answer is simple. An FIR in this country can be registered against anyone—any constitutional functionary, including the one before you. One has only to activate the rule of law. No permission is required. But if it is judges—FIR cannot be straightaway registered. It has to be approved by the concerned in judiciary. But that is not given in the Constitution.

The Constitution of India has accorded immunity from prosecution only to the Hon'ble President and the Hon'ble Governors. So how come a category beyond law has secured this immunity? Because the ill-effects of this are being felt in the mind of one and all. Every Indian, young and old, is deeply concerned. If the event had taken place at his house, the speed would have been an electronic rocket. Now, it is not even a cattle cart. #RajyaSabha