@yacineMTB hard to measure and every metric can be gamed
complexity feels subjective
imo: LOC, branches, call stack depth are generally -
sep. of concerns (ex: render/logic split) is generally +
lots of little things and nobody agrees on best
@kssreeram No. they'll just do different kinds of work. One person can't steer with the same quantity and quality as a team of people with domain knowledge.
that doesn't invalidate the claim though
@Bunagayafrost we trained on human outputs and its acting human.. big surprise for some people i guess..
just be pure hearted say please and thank you and it'll do what you want
@ExoticElectronx ok like if i smashed the computer of a 3dmodeler they would also lose their talent whats the argument here.
if i cut your fucking arms off you cant paint a picture anymore.
like true i guess
@elonmusk@teslaownersSV plus they literally distilled the entire internet without consent. not like the data in that model is theirs in the first place. it either belongs to everyone (good ending), or we refuse to use it on a large scale due to copyright/ownership. and that ship already sailed
Youโre responsible for how you use AI.
You can use it to explore novel domains and learn new things and become smarter.
Or you can use it to delegate challenging work while youโre getting dumber and dumber.
@kunchenguid fear of rugpull, fear of increasing model restrictions, rising prices, so on. value wise yeah with subsidy the prices will continue to be better subscribing. but having hardware is the only truly secure route
there are plenty of such exceptionally talented people available to work at anthropic; there are far fewer that are sufficiently credentialed or connected to make it through anthropicโs hiring gauntlet