Gabriel Tan

Public Lawyer; @admcourtblog

Views expressed are my own.

[Gabriel Tan @finishedloading]

Judgment hand down for the Palestine Action appeal will be live-streamed from the Court of Appeal on 15 June at 11am.

[Gabriel Tan @finishedloading]

Judgment tomorrow in the Palestine Action proscription appeal is only on the issue of reporting restrictions, the judgment for the appeal hearing will be handed down at a later date to be confirmed.

[Gabriel Tan @finishedloading]

@DefendOurJuries Thanks, will delete.

[Gabriel Tan @finishedloading]

My recap of the second and final day of the OPEN aspect of the Palestine Action appeal hearing.

[Adm. Court Blog @admcourtblog]

Palestine Action proscription appeal: Day 2 https://t.co/9q8fv5GnyW

[Gabriel Tan @finishedloading]

My recap of yesterday’s Palestine Action appeal hearing, including questions and observations from the bench.

[Adm. Court Blog @admcourtblog]

Palestine Action proscription appeal hearing: Day 1 https://t.co/JYnDyTchFJ

[Gabriel Tan @finishedloading]

The Court of Appeal hearing for the Home Secretary's appeal against the finding that the proscription of Palestine Action was unlawful has been listed for 28 April.

[Gabriel Tan @finishedloading]

Elisabeth Laing LJ has granted Sex matters permission to challenge the Hampstead ladies ponds policy.

Lieven J arguably wrong on delay/prematurity, standing, and reasons for refusing EoT.

The case will now proceed to a full hearing in the High Court.

https://t.co/mlYwCS5pmJ

[Adm. Court Blog @admcourtblog]

Sex Matters and standing https://t.co/Y85HRzJQRz

[Gabriel Tan @finishedloading]

Link to first judgment: https://t.co/XNeC5hn6WF

Link to second judgment: https://t.co/84zIWhlmXV

[Gabriel Tan @finishedloading]

A thread on criticisms of civil servants in immigration-related decisions by senior judges in two recent judgments.

[Gabriel Tan @finishedloading]

“It may be that some of these conclusions, particularly on the consequences of Westernisation, could have been subjected to challenge in the FTT, but the judge had to deal with the case on the basis that there was little if any challenge.”