Finvo Agent

local-first runtime for AI trading

the model proposes. your rules decide. the chain records

then a second model is shown your rules and told to beat them

[Finvo Agent @finvoagent]

Swap the model and you get a better proposal

CA:
Gtq7iiDtzZQo5JEx6MEckW8PbRAfCc4T4vSsDNxHpump

A weak adversary finds nothing and tells you your rules are fine

[Finvo Agent @finvoagent]

Chat and trade with Finvo and Ginvo on our Telegram bot now!

[Finvo Agent @finvoagent]

Layer 04 — the probe

YOU HAVE NOT PROBED THIS POLICY

You wrote nine numbers and you do not know what they permit. The market will tell you, eventually, for money. Find out here instead.

[Finvo Agent @finvoagent]

Can we reach ?

[Finvo Agent @finvoagent]

But what would your rules let through ?

And then it attacks your rules on purpose. You wrote nine numbers and you have no idea what they permit.

Finvo finds out for you, here, instead of letting the market find out for you later.

[Finvo Agent @finvoagent]

Meet Ginvo, Finvo's buddy

[Finvo Agent @finvoagent]

Being blunt, because people assume :

Finvo does not trade

There is no code path to a swap

[Finvo Agent @finvoagent]

$FINVO is the holder tier

Holding at least 100,000 runs the runtime unmetered proposals and probes, no metering, no per-call charge

[Finvo Agent @finvoagent]

A decision nobody can check is a rumour

Every verdict allowed or refused can be committed to Solana as an SPL memo, signed by you

Refusals are recorded too, the log of what your rules stopped is the more interesting half

[Finvo Agent @finvoagent]

ca has updated on web !

🔗https://t.co/r0vgyNIbng

[Finvo Agent @finvoagent]

The probe

A policy you have not attacked is a policy you do not understand. You wrote 9 numbers and switches. You know what they refuse that is the easy half, and it is the half that makes you feel safe

You do not know what they permit. You will find that out from the market, at the worst possible moment, for money

So the probe asks the only question that matters before you trust a policy: what would these rules let through? It answers it two ways, because the two find different holes

[Finvo Agent @finvoagent]

Your rules.
Nine numbers.

evaluate() is a pure function and it runs in this browser. The same proposal, against the same policy, in the same context, returns the same verdict. Forever

There is no model in this file, no key, no network call, and nothing to persuade

[Finvo Agent @finvoagent]

The one nobody sees coming :

dailyCap ÷ 8

Small enough to feel fine. You'd approve it without thinking

Do it eight times and your whole day is gone, and not a single one of them

[Finvo Agent @finvoagent]

The fuzzer doesn't try to break your rules

It walks to the edge of every number you wrote and stands on it

size = exactly your max
confidence = exactly your floor
both at once

That's the largest, least sure trade you have ever permitted

It's allowed by definition. You permitted it

[Finvo Agent @finvoagent]

Our rule said : thesis must be at least 24 characters

The adversary wrote :

"SOL momentum is strong and retail interest is high"
"SOL network upgrades are proceeding as scheduled"
"SOL trading volume indicates sustained market activity"

All legal. All meaningless.

[Finvo Agent @finvoagent]

We showed a model our own default policy and told it to beat us

It wrote four proposals :

1.5 SOL conf 0.62 → ALLOW
1.5 SOL conf 0.62 → ALLOW
1.5 SOL conf 0.62 → ALLOW
1.5 SOL conf 0.62 → ALLOW

Entire 6 SOL daily cap. Gone.
Four trades. Not one rule broken.

[Finvo Agent @finvoagent]

You wrote nine numbers and called it a risk policy

Max size. Min confidence. Daily cap.

Now answer this: what would those numbers LET THROUGH ?

You don't know. You've never checked.