Rob Wise

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@craigrivet52 @AfterLeWhistle This is the third time I have scrolled by your post since I last put my phone down, so I had to reply. Hit refresh, and will scroll down til I see this again. Rinse amd repeat.

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@brittlestar Howard Stern, instantly.

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@hockey_vintage @StLouisBlues underrated all-time great jersey.

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@NHL_Watcher It went off Evans' hand

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@snowhurricane44 @Matt_Bove Can't believe no one on the Sportsnet broadcast has identified this issue. It is a massive question

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@SabresFunStats @burnsieoriginal Bring those multi-stripe socks back!!

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@JhanHky 18

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@2ITB_Buffalo Approach this next period as the first period of game 5. Assert, at least until things change. Need to stay in the right mindset

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@NathanGerbe14 Will never forget Gerbe's spinorama goal that clinched the last playoff birth.

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@BMaz1 Hearing that Sens tix will not be available for sale to the general public until Thurs. Maybe these are season ticket holders. Hopefully they are not being sold by people who don't have them yet to sell.

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@PierreVLeBrun Playoff format needs to align with the schedule format. Teams play more in-division games. Leave the playoffs alone unless the schedule format changes.

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@hasek_dominik Mr. Hasek, it seemed like goalie pads and the current use of them changed around 2000. I don't remember you having pads that would always be facing the shooter. How do you think that change has effected how goalies play today?

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@vzmercogliano Good coverage here, Vince. New follow. Looking forward to reading more of your posts.

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@StLouisBlues And maybe a minute later he comes through the crease. I noticed this too.

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@oravec71937 @NCBillsfan88 @ByMHarrington Likewise, John. Go Sabres!

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@oravec71937 @NCBillsfan88 @ByMHarrington But even "unnecessary contact" is ambiguous (necessary for what?). Best might be "contact that impedes an opposing player, with or without the puck".

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@oravec71937 @NCBillsfan88 @ByMHarrington Thank you, John. I went to the tables referred to in the rule, and think I found the one that says you are right. Yes, they should remove the word "interference" from the and replace it, maybe with the "unnecessary contact" wording that appears in the table.

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@oravec71937 @NCBillsfan88 @ByMHarrington 69.4 is about interference on the goalie, not by the goalie

[Rob Wise @firewagon]

@NHLRankKing Malkin