@IOHK_Charles@phillip_pon You’re not looking for progress Charles you’re running on 256 encryption and Kyber or delithium isn’t the answer either you arrogant fuk
@swipathefox you either don’t have a brain or purposely lost the game. Throw up a garbage shot instead of running the clock out not to mention all the other stuff.
@IOHK_Charles Not in its current state it’s 256 at best - can can deploy 5,000-10,000 bit easily but you’re arrogant just like your team and never respond
@IOHK_Charles I only blame you because no matter how many times I tell you we can integrate an existing NIST file 140-3 approved 5-10,000 bit encryption you nor your team ever respond. You clearly don’t care
@marcel_aromeh I’ve won these cases but you do it in private in writing ahead of time, you bring the IRS in to audit the bonds and securities the court sold in fraud.
@marcel_aromeh You have to go after the securities that the court sold, ALL court cases are calling a dead fictional entity read 2016 gov styles manual on all caps, and Chicago manual styles page 665 and 666. It’s all about selling securities
@CartNarcs No you infringed on his trademark by putting your trademark overtop with your magnet. Thus violating his private rights. Too bad you didn’t get sht on
@LendingLiesX Wrong. Defendant is always guilty as the “charge” is a bill that is left unpaid. Go after the securities in private, demand settlement out of court. That’s what the game is about. We’ve done it. And you better have a private trust.
@Ansleysgarden All you have to do is go get the land pattern and file it there’s no eminent domain then. All they’re doing is buying a fictional overlay of your actual land. It’s your only recourse stop complaining.
@Nicole06079614 The ticket they give you is a presentment offered a contract and a negotiable instrument. It is no different than a federal reserve note. You should be signing it without recourse without prejudice by: Grant tour and below without recourse you should put pay to the order of: name