@trycommit loving this so far! One thing that’s frustrating. I started using the app about 11:50 pm, added a couple of commitments at 12:02 am, and when I go to yesterday’s box those newest commitments aren’t available to mark. Could you add a setting for what time a day ends?
I asked chatGPT which makes more sense, "The food is for the dog only and the cat if they are around" or "The food is for the dog and the cat if they are around" and it told me the expected answer (the second), and explained what each implied and why the second made more sense.
@inkandswitch I just read your paper on Peritext. Really interesting stuff. In the case of two users inserting text at the afterId, rather than ordering by opId, could the order by optionally implemented by asking an AI which order makes more sense?
E.g., starting with "The food is for the dog if she is around"
A: inserts "only" with afterId "dog"
B: inserts "and the cat" with afterId "dog", and changes "she is" to "they are"
@pengx17 Ok. Good to know. Thanks!
What I'd really like to do is be able to run logseq in a browser but from a server, so the graph that's loaded comes form that server instead of locally. Then the same graph can be used no matter which computer I'm on, without any syncing.
@pengx17 Would it be possible to somehow use your logseq publish github action to publish logseq to a site where it can also be edited? (i.e., To use the headless logseq in a web browser from anywhere through playwright?)
@tiensonqin I was looking through your code today in the logseq CRDT branch, integrating yjs, and allowing collaborative logseq editing. Any chance this might see the light of day?
@AstroKatie This is amazing! So the galaxies farthest away, around how many degrees of our view in the night sky do they take up? Is it like they look a dot a bit bigger than a same-sized galaxy that is closer? Or more like they take up half the sky?
@AdamParkhomenko It’s amazing that she says a law that prevents people from killing a tiny person is described here as something holding a gun to the head of the mom. It’s preventing holding a gun to the head of the fetus. Does this seem ironic to anyone else?
@twittilating@14rogersalex @Saintsfan5348 @AdamParkhomenko And even if “thigh falling away” is properly translated as “miscarry”, it’s God doing this, since the water only makes it happen if she is guilty. If God kills a baby, is that a person having an abortion?
This is a far cry from the Bible endorsing abortion.
@twittilating@14rogersalex @Saintsfan5348 @AdamParkhomenko The water is given as a test, to find Gods judgement about whether the woman was guilty like her jealous husband thought, or innocent. And if she’s innocent, after drinking the water she will be able to have children in the future. The water doesn’t kill a baby.
@14rogersalex @Saintsfan5348 @AdamParkhomenko You should read it again. I have seen this argument come up twice today alone, but the verses do not suggest or condone or direct abortion. They do say to give a woman suspected of adultery bitter water and then God will judge her either guilty or innocent. There’s no abortion.