MMTLP
Everyone please like and repost this reply from Starboard in Shawn Ryan's comments.
Also engage with Shawn (eg. share screenshots of FIF FOIA) but please please PLEASE like and repost Starboard's reply (Ann's video).
@ShawnRyanShow is friends with @EliCrane_CEO as they are both former Navy Seals. Eli has been on the show before and is a big advocate for us.
Ann told us to get loud, loud, LOUD!
BREAKING 🚨 UNDER GARY GENSLER’S LEADERSHIP, THE SEC HAS BEEN CAUGHT COLLUDING WITH WALL STREET
FOIA records reveal a broker trade group pushed the SEC to deny an S-1 due to unaccounted-for shares, known as naked shorts ⬇️ $MMTLP
This is HUGE Ann Vandersteel is on the front lines uncovering the #MMTLP conspiracy: short sellers like Anson Fund, complicit regulators via SEC/FINRA blunders (proven by FOIA docs), & a system rigged against everyday investors. Ann, your fearless journalism could shatter this & restore billions stolen from 65K families. We're behind you 100% keep pushing! The people demand transparency NOW. Who's with us?
Hey Charles - maybe Ann can help us get us the share count of $MMTLP. What do you think? @cvpayne@annvandersteel Remember your interview with Hester the walking hedge fund brochure? @HesterPeirce We're still here over 1100 DAYS.
Referring to $MMTLP, @annvandersteel says she will expose it all!
Well Ann, here's a selection of videos you can watch to help you get started.
MMTLP: The Case Against The SEC Part 1
https://t.co/uEInJHSnb5
MMTLP: The Case Against The SEC Part 2
https://t.co/WXtn7HuEW1
MMTLP: The Case Against The SEC Part 2.5
https://t.co/9CrAuFPQof
MMTLP: The Case Against The SEC Part 3
https://t.co/rqpM7TQ344
MMTLP: The Case Against The SEC Part 4
https://t.co/j3hRplPZgw
MMTLP: 12/5/22
https://t.co/mgXqvuMHXZ
MMTLP: 12/12/22
https://t.co/lDxVE9evsB
The #MMTLP case is no longer about “angry retail investors.”
It is now about:
Whether a self-regulatory organization intervened in a market to protect counterparties
Whether brokers and market makers continued internal settlement while retail was locked out
Whether evidence was mishandled or destroyed
Whether arbitration has been used to prevent exposure rather than resolve disputes
The legal system has finally forced the door open and I'm walking through that door. And I am bringing a cattle prod with my 1,000,000 candle spotlight.
THE REGULATORY SCAM ENDS NOW
Ann,
your fearless deep dive into the #MMTLP situation today is exactly the kind of truth-seeking journalism we need, exposing the ties to short sellers like Anson Fund, regulatory failures by FINRA and the OTC (at minimum), and the systemic protection of market insiders at the expense of retail investors and the issuers @Metamaterialtec@nbhydrocarbons
Lots of people have been fighting this for over three years, and your spotlight is a game-changer.
If there's any way this community can assist your research, digging up additional info, sources, or connections, just say the word.
Everyone is ready to help amplify the truth and push for real accountability.
Keep shining that 1,000,000 candlepower light! #AlterOrAbolish
Call for a Transparent, Public Congressional Hearing
Given the latest ridiculous developments, I am prepared to participate in a public hearing in front of Congress if @FINRA, OTC Markets, the SEC, and all other relevant parties are also called to testify, covering all relevant dates and events, both pre- and post-merger.
This must be a transparent, unscripted hearing, where:
•No one takes the Fifth Amendment.
•No one hides behind attorney-client privilege.
•No prepared testimony.
Each of us should sit, answer questions directly, and be cross-examined live on national television.
In my case, I would arrive with nothing but my laptop to show contemporaneous emails and records on a large screen, free of “I don’t recall” answers. I estimate that 3–5 days would be enough to reveal the full pattern of misconduct (or corruption at the highest levels).
Yes, I would be at the greatest disadvantage, as I am not a lawyer, not a native English speaker, and I have never participated in a trial or hearing. But that only underscores my commitment to full transparency.
Why This Hearing Matters
•The Gensler “lost messages” latest episode: We are told that the @SEC Chair’s communications during the exact period covering the U3 trading halt have vanished. Are we truly expected to believe this is coincidence? It looks more like a Hollywood script than reality. I dare say these missing messages likely contain evidence that Mr. Gensler knew far more than he disclosed to Congress…
•The Trustee’s subpoena vs. FINRA’s motion to quash: If FINRA genuinely believed this was a simple “pump-and-dump” scheme orchestrated by insiders, why would they resist providing evidence? Why not help the Trustee by producing the data that could supposedly prove their point, eh? Instead, they are obstructing. That silence speaks volumes.
•FINRA’s role: It is long past time for FINRA to stop hiding behind self-authored FAQs, opaque rules, and armies of lawyers. The public deserves to see who they are really protecting.
I call upon:
•The Administration and @POTUS
•Investigative journalists
•The FBI and State Attorneys General
…to dig deeply into this case. Every new twist makes it more ridiculous, and more urgent.
On Congressional Protocol
While House and Senate committees traditionally require written testimony, and usually allow legal counsel and privilege claims, the Chair has authority to waive these rules in the interest of public transparency. It is rare for all parties to voluntarily waive privilege, but the public demand for full accountability in this case is overwhelming.
So… let’s offer the American people the truth, uncensored, unfiltered and unscripted.
Convenient narratives don’t change inconvenient facts about systemic misconduct. Meanwhile, when CEOs rely on their counsel, we are called naive or worse, but when regulators ‘lose’ the SEC Chair’s messages during the exact period of the U3 halt and other events (FTX), that’s just a technical glitch. Convenient. The truth is, I show up here with a laptop (which the former MMAT management moved into an undisclosed wooden crate… along with the company server to potentially “lose them”forever under one of the business unit sales… Mr CEO Uzi Sasson should have taken notes from Gensler… Uzi bud… I think your time is coming soon). FINRA and the SEC show up with armies of lawyers, motions to quash, and selective amnesia. If that’s not a Hollywood script, I don’t know what is.
Now THIS Is Funny!!🤣😡🤣
The SEC puts this out-
“A Guide For SENIORS: Protect Yourself Against Investment Fraud”
And they reference FINRA as a resource for senior investors!🤡
Grandma Lila knows the truth… FINRA & the SEC should be ashamed of what they have done to $MMTLP !
So @FINRA says they actually meant to put $MMTLP "Symbol Deletion" instead of Share Cancellation, effective December 13th, because it's FINRA's role to Delete the Symbol, not to Cancel Shares.
Who cared about what FINRA's role was in a Corporate Action that they were NOT a party to (as they say)???
You'll NEVER find another example on FINRA's Daily List of an Exchanged Event Type Corporate Action that mentions "Symbol Deletion", let alone one that prioritizes "Symbol Deletion" over the actual EXCHANGE and CANCELLATION of Shares.
FINRA also put effort into deceiving the reader of the UPC Notice because they mention that the halt will end concurrently with "Symbol Deletion" effective December 13th, the equivalent of a neverending halt...
But FINRA also references "Share Cancellation" as if to say, "See, even the S1 said that the SHARES were going to be CANCELLED." But FINRA doesn't put a date next to Share Cancellation.
This is the same deception they carried over from the Corporate Action because if FINRA bothered to clarify their role to Delete the Symbol, why didn't they clarify the correct December 14th after Market Close Share Cancellation Date on the revised Corporate Action?
Back to the UPC notice!
There's a link along with the blurb about Share Cancellation, but FINRA chose to link to a version of the S1 that was yet to include dates!
Why would they do that on December 9th, when the dates were available publicly since November 18th?
It's because FINRA was trying to deceive investors into believing that FINRA didn't do anything out of the ordinary.
But it is out of the ordinary to make a Corporate Action to conduct a 1 for 1 Exchange on December 14th after Market Close, followed by the automatic Cancellation of $MMTLP Shares...
Solely focused on the DELETION of the Trading Symbol 40 hours BEFOREHAND!!!
FINRA deceived investors and they deceived their member firms, because even after the revision the member firms were informing their clients that Share Cancellation was December 13th.
And oddly enough, the one thing that was clear in both Corporate Actions, that positions needed to be settled by 12/12 to be entitled to the distribution...
And purchases executed after 12/8 wouldn't get the distribution...
The reason TD Ameritrade and Charles Schwab said in this image that New Buys wouldn't be allowed after 12/8, this was the thing FINRA said they needed to protect investors from.
Even if there was random brokerage that somehow allowed a New Buy after 12/8, FINRA's Rule 11893 could've easily rendered the transactions null and void, returning the money to the buyer.
FINRA lied!
And it wasn't until 3 months later, in the first FAQ that FINRA first acknowledged the December 14th Share Cancellation Date...
Long after the damage was done!
One of most disturbing aspects of this is that this couldn't have been accomplished by a single individual, it isn't how the process was designed.
Thought went into this and the @SECGov is just pretending like they don't see it, most likely because they were involved!
So now, after 1,000 days, it's time that they fully take the spotlight.
@SECPaulSAtkins
$MMTLP Greg McCabe states "we will pay any price.......to assure the survival and the success of our company"
He believes America still stands on the principles of truth, justice and the Rule of Law and in the end, America gets it right.
The MMTLP investors across the world need to see actions and not words from the US government, members of Congress, regulatory authorities and the courts, to make this true.
I didn't use Twitter/X much before @FINRA U3 halted $MMTLP on 12/9/22.
A year later, I was easily one of the most prolific posters on the subject and I ONLY posted about MMTLP.
So why was the @The_DTCC following me?
I know I @'d them many times so maybe they just viewed a post and accidentally hit "follow".
Or maybe it was something else!
I didn't think the @SECGov would allow us to go nearly 1,000 days without reaching a resolution that favors those that held MMTLP, but here we (almost) are!
Investors have taken their own lives over this, relationships have been tested, and some families have fallen apart because of this.
People have lost their homes, put off retirement, missed out on extremely lucrative investment opportunities, and so many of us have lost out on opportunities to help people that might still be here if MMTLP ended the way it should have.
And even as I post this, the SEC is continually standing in the way of Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, and pursuing "distraction" charges against the former CEOs, while FINRA waves their immunity and those SEC charges at anyone requesting transparency.
The DTCC hasn't been helpful either!
You know, the whole FINRA Fraud narrative would've been a convenient way to contain this, but I wonder if that ship has sailed.
Who would've thought a little dividend placeholder that was never meant to trade would end up exposing EVERYTHING?
Even still, and I can't speak for everyone, but I think if the right resolution came soon, many of us would move on.
Or maybe 1,000 days is the point of no return!
Dear Commissioner @HesterPeirce,
We live in the era of #blockchain technology and Artificial Intelligence, which i believe you have been closely following.
You may already know my views on dark pools, HFTs, FINRA and the OTC, especially with all the latest cross-border loophole that the community has uncovered, affecting a number of issuers and retail investors.
The Problem Now:
•Dark pools in the EU/UK (Asia is starting to clean up) can execute trades without U.S. retail visibility.
•Cross-border trades often avoid FINRA/SEC surveillance windows.
Based on recent reports and new FOIA Data it looks like @FINRA , a Self-Regulated Organisation -SRO-, is at the core of this problem, providing cover to its “client” members, with respect, creates an incestuous MESS.
Recent examples, #GME #OPENAI #MMTLP #MMATF ETC are not “oops.” They are symptoms of a market structure where dark pools, synthetic shares, and cross-border loopholes can be exploited faster than regulators can write a memo… or an FAQ… or two FAQs…in the name of liquidity.
Now let’s imagine a self regulator that’s both incorruptible and always on duty.
What would that look like?
The SEC would retire/dismantle FINRA, and replace it with a next-generation SRO, fully run on public blockchain infrastructure.
You would be basically launching the worlds 1st Blockchain Regulatory Organization - aka “BRO” - the one that actually has your back, 24/7.
#BROchain would:
•Log every order globally, in real time, on a public blockchain of you design.
•Kill synthetic share creation with tokenized share registries.
•Detect spoofing at the point of trade submission, not years later, alerting investors and issuers in realtime.
•Make U3 halts and rule changes impossible to hide, immutable, timestamped, visible to retail, issuers and regulators alike.
In a BROchain world, manipulations fail at the START, not get buried in “ongoing investigations”
Commissioner, will you help make blockchain ledgers a reality, or do we wait for the next scandal (@OpenAI ?? @SpaceX ???) to potentially destroy more investor trust?
Imagine blockchain technology delivering:
•Immutable Trade Data – Every order, fill, and cancellation logged on-chain in real time, accessible to the public, eliminating dark pools, hidden swaps, cross border arbitrage, spoofing, synthetic shares and selective disclosure.
•Transparent Rule Enforcement – Smart contracts enforce compliance rules automatically, with violations flagged instantly and without human “interpretation” bias.
•True Investor Protection – Audit trails are tamper-proof, timestamped, and visible to both regulators, issuers and retail investors, no more “we’ll get back to you in 90 days” evasions… or in some cases 1000 days
•Global Standards Compatibility – Blockchain-based oversight could integrate cross-border market surveillance, removing the “regulatory blind spots” that market makers like VIRTU, CITADEL etc exploit.
In short: Replace the fox guarding the henhouse with a digital PUBLIC ledger that never sleeps, never lies, and can’t be bribed.
In a system like BRO, sure, you might “lose” some of that sweet enforcement income…
You know, the same slush that’s been propping up the all-time low IPO market of the last two decades
But don’t worry, it’ll be more than offset by the radical concept of… wait for it… more investors actually trusting the markets and more companies doing IPOs (a problem which you recently spoke about)
Crazy idea, right???
Imagine replacing the “fines-as-revenue” model that breeds parasites with an actual “trust-as-revenue” model, where enforcement still catches the real bad actors, but the system is designed to stop most of them before they strike.
You build trust, more investors show up, more companies go public, and the SEC, broker-dealers, and market makers all help the markets do what they were meant to do in the first place
Now that would be a legacy worth bragging about.
Reviewing old FOIA’s and don’t think I posted this one. Gary Gensler’s staff from the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance, Trading and Markets, and Examinations, provided Pete Sessions staff a briefing September 5, 2023 regarding #MMTLP $MMTLP.