Men are so easily captivated by big breasts, because the form itself entraps them. Ill-found love, but flat chests themselves contain no form to deceive or seduce. They are above all else pure and delightful to my soul!
To behold flat chests is to behold the universe! To simple minded men, big boobs are amazing, for they focus on the form. While flatness has no form, no temptation, instead containing the spirit of the heavens!
Wise men contemplate flat chests!
Barabians lust after Big Breasts.
@richard_katuin@Carebear07141@matthewdmarsden And Ezekiel 28:7,
"I am going to bring foreigners against you, the most ruthless of nations; they will draw their swords against your beauty and wisdom and pierce your shining splendor."
These rioters, these "protestors" fly forienger flags, and have no respect.
@richard_katuin@Carebear07141@matthewdmarsden God's judgement against those who have abandoned their faith in Him is sending foriegners into their nation. Allowing them to take and devour, horde and leave the natives with nothing, until they are destroyed. We see exactly that happening. Godless EU, recieving their punishment
@twighhhhhhh@CyclopsHoppe For example, your earlier claim is "+ it’s a dead body necrophilia is wrong" you are just doing an is-ought fallacy. Dead body = is wrong. You're jumping from a descriptive to a moral statement. You are not providing why its wrong. Its dead, yes, but why is it wrong?
@twighhhhhhh@CyclopsHoppe You're just saying things. Why is taking advantage of someone morally wrong? You are just stating things. "This is just wrong," "well doing that is wrong and bad" you are not giving a foundation reason why its wrong.
@twighhhhhhh@CyclopsHoppe The same value arises from "yelling at me is a moral evil." I am using the same arguement as you are. There is no logical conclusion between "animals cannot consent, therefore it is evil/wrong." You are just stating a descriptive.
@twighhhhhhh@CyclopsHoppe This is a is-ought fallacy. Animal's can't consent doesn't meant it ought to be wrong. Why is the incapacity to consent morally wrong? Additionally, animals do not consent to being eaten, possibly being caged, or even having their homes destroyed for urban housing.