Pythism

Dave, pianist, aimer as a hobby

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@centristlol @ypealvinegro @yamidamian1 @DeusDeadened @thinkiamsad It is a fair point, and as the other poster pointed out, I'm contradicting myself, it's only amoral, not cruel. But the point remains that this leads us closer to nihilism and absurdist thought because life ends up being pointless as per my points 2 and 3.

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@ypealvinegro @centristlol @yamidamian1 @DeusDeadened @thinkiamsad Ok, you're right, I've giga contradicted myself, I didn't realize. And yeah, you yourself said it, god is amoral at best.

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@ypealvinegro @centristlol @yamidamian1 @DeusDeadened @thinkiamsad It's amoral because there's no ill intent behind the cruelty. It is cruel because animals harm each other, and thus cause a lot of suffering, and it's on a scale of literally hundreds of millions of years. It is even more cruel because the animals have no choice when doing it

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@ypealvinegro @centristlol @yamidamian1 @DeusDeadened @thinkiamsad I'm not sure I follow, how exactly am I contradicting myself?

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@ypealvinegro @centristlol @yamidamian1 @DeusDeadened @thinkiamsad Because it leads to cruelty and moral nihilism, which is related to my other two points.

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@centristlol @yamidamian1 @ypealvinegro @DeusDeadened @thinkiamsad It's still brutal and amoral. Nobody is saying that you should feel good or bad, it's neutral. But remember, us humans ARE animals, we have the same instincts from millions of years of evolution and are thus, amoral to an extent. And you haven't even addressed my other two points

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@plutoxcsm Thank you for constantly posting a consistently fair and thorough reading of CSM. Makes me appreciate it that much more

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@centristlol @yamidamian1 @ypealvinegro @DeusDeadened @thinkiamsad Animals cause harm to each other, some even to the point of agonizing excruciating pain. Some animals rape, some maim, some just kill. Parasites even rob you of your autonomy. Simply to not die. I would call it amoral, they are not evil.

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@centristlol @yamidamian1 @ypealvinegro @DeusDeadened @thinkiamsad Ok, let's assume that god is not truly omnipotent but is instead bound by logic.

1. He designed a brutal, amoral evolutionary system.
2. If he fixes it all in the end, morality becomes a meaningless game. Everyone goes to heaven.
3. If he doesn't fix it in the end, he is cruel

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@ypealvinegro @DeusDeadened @thinkiamsad @centristlol He should be able to. Omnipotent means no limits and all powerful, in fact I'd argue such a being has to exist outside all we consider reality to even exist, to the point of being able to alter all facets of reality, including doing aparent paradoxes.

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@1recsr3te @DeusDeadened @thinkiamsad @centristlol And even then, the paradox is irrelevant because and all powerful being can solve it, by virtue of being all powerful

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@1recsr3te @DeusDeadened @thinkiamsad @centristlol Ability and will are closely related, but not quite the same. Do you have the will to jump up 10 meters? No, because you don't have the ability. If the ability to do evil was removed it simply wouldn't cross your head, like you don't think of using your body to fly in your day.

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@DeusDeadened @thinkiamsad @centristlol This argument falls apart because God, an omnipotent being, should be able to create a world where there's both no evil and free will. Same way he can create a rock that he can't lift and then proceed to lift it.

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@nataliadc @FelipeMuBe Dudo que sea que el nivel cognitivo esté en decline. La explicación más sencilla es que aquel que tiene las redes, tiene la elección; véase las dos campañas de Trump como gran ejemplo.

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@NewKakyoin @Lol8ball Quite literally

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@OwlHouseIsGreat A little bit off topic, but this post lives rent-free in my head.

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@Shivermetmbrr I like your theory, Bangkok Fumiko. It's a good reading of the text.

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@VeteranFoid @mxmx9842 @fatamorus I'm sorry but I cannot find reasonable grounds to call the ending bad.

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@rodddella @valenntinntinn @rakugotchi todo esto haya pasado solo por cambiar a Pochita y da la impresión que tú tienes, de que el entorno fue el que los cambió. Esa crítica sí estoy de acuerdo, pero es más un problema de ejecución de parte fe Fujimoto que del concepto del final.

[Pythism @Flaeonian]

@rodddella @valenntinntinn @rakugotchi defecto". Ese argumento no es sólido, pero resuena temáticamente, por lo cual tiendo hacia este. Finalmente el último capítulo nos muestra que sí pueden cambiar a pesar de su entorno. Ahora, sí estoy de acuerdo que se siente cuando menos raro y definitivamente insatisfactorio que