@HHampikyan Türkiye’de insanımız neden “Almanya Türkleri” demek yerine “Almancı” ifadesini kullanmakta asıl. Türkçede -cı / -ci / -cu / -cü eki fikre, kişiye veya gruba bağlılık bildirmek için kullanılır, Hamparsum!
@BayBolot@SergenCirkin O dönemdeki yazarlar (Nevâî, Babür, Ebülgazi) kendi dillerine Çağatayca değil, Türk dili demiştir. Dil biliminde bir lehçe, hanedan soyuna göre değil, yazılı eserlerin dil özelliklerine göre adlandırılır.
@BayBolot@SergenCirkin Çağatay Türkçesi diye bir Türk dili veya
lehçe yok! O dönem hiçkimse ben çağıtayca konuşuyorum demez. Bu bir uydurma. Hâkâniye terimi daha uygun.
You - @ACTBrigitte - and all US citizens should be read very closely.
Your recent remarks about Türkiye as a 'sponsor of terrorism' are concerning. Perhaps it’s time to take a step back and reconsider the true nature of alliances. While Türkiye has consistently fought against terrorism, including groups like PKK/YPG/SDF, it’s important to reflect on the fact that the U.S. itself has been involved in partnerships with these very organizations.
What’s even more troubling is that Türkiye has been the only country to launch a full-scale operation against ISIS, notably through the 'Euphrates Shield Operation' (Fırat Kalkanı Harekatı) in August 2016, aimed at clearing its border from ISIS. The Turkish Armed Forces, alongside the Syrian National Army, successfully cleared 2,015 square kilometers of territory from terrorism and neutralized 2,647 ISIS militants. This isn’t just a fight against a terrorist group; it’s a battle for regional stability.
Instead of pointing fingers, perhaps it's time to reassess which nations truly stand for stability and security, and which ones are fostering chaos through misplaced alliances.
You might want to take a moment to reflect on who your true ally is, or should be. It’s time to seriously consider the implications of partnering with a terrorist organization that threatens the very stability of the ally you claim to support.