@IfindRetards he's a man-child, a petulant entitled child actor who never grew up and is bitter about not being the big star he thinks he deserves to be
Everyone who is been in the fight against transgender ideology for a long time has had so many moments of “this will be the thing that makes people realize how bad it is…”
The absurdity of men just claiming to be women wasn’t enough.
Young people revealing they had thought they were “trans” and then realizing they weren’t after unnecessary medicalization & irreversible surgery didn’t do it.
Gay men & lesbians getting hounded as “genital fetishists” for not being attracted to the opposite sex should have made enough people realize that the “LGBTQIA+ community” isn’t as harmonious as it claims to be.
Women who recall the abuse in their marriages as their husband announced he is actually a woman should be enough to dismantle the whole lie.
People fired from their jobs for simply not believing it, families ripped apart for knowing their child isn’t the opposite sex, and women dragged through courts for years for opposing it, is a massive red flag for all of society, but not enough apparently.
There are endless examples of the horror of transgender ideology. Every part of it is horrific.
And then, now, you think, “men who claim to be women breastfeeding babies, making them literally ingest the ideology” has to be the moment everything stops. Surely. Now that everyone knows it, this is going to be it…
It has long been at the point where anyone still going along with transgender ideology either likes what it is doing or doesn’t care about anything but how something so bad actually benefits them.
@LibraNextDoor I think it is okay for a dude to wear a dress or dress however but you do look unwell and not female if that is what you are going for
Maybe just accept yourself as you are... male. I don't think whatever you are doing here is beneficial to you, mentally or physically
Things that are not genocide:
-- When a man seeks to join a woman's rugby team and is told he cannot join because he is a man but is eligible to join the team corresponding to his sex.
-- When a man is told he cannot use the ladies changing room but must use the changing room that corresponds to his sex.
-- When a male murderer who says he is a woman is told he must remain in a prison with other men rather than be transferred to a women's prison based on his claim to be a woman.
-- When the state declines to pay for a man's castration
-- When the state declines to pay for a man's mandibular reconstruction surgery.
-- When a passport or driver's license lists the material fact of a man's sex instead of his private reverie to be a woman
-- When a person remains free to refer to the material fact of a person's sex rather than being coerced by state power into joining in a person's attempted falsification of this fact
-- When a 9-year old child is judged ineligible to be prescribed an off-label cancer drug in order to freeze him in a pre-pubertal state so as to better mimic the appearance of a member of the opposite sex
Not only are none of these acts genocidal, none of them violate any right that any person has.
If they were granted, as they have been in many states, they would simply be discretionary entitlements being handed out by the state to a legally privileged caste of person at the expense of the rights of others.
Where they are being removed, it is simply a reversion to a status quo without a legally privileged caste being rewarded with special rights that come at the expense of the rights and finances of others.
Glad to clear this confusion up, guys -- I expect you will now desist from claiming that you are victims of a genocide when you are not victims of rights violation of any kind.
@Abhishek060722 A lot of people seem easily fooled by clothes and makeup
I would imagine easily fooled by AI and social engineering as well
Scary to think about