STOP SEXUALIZING SEX
STOP SEXUALIZING SEX
STOP SEXUALIZING SEX
STOP SEXUALIZING SEX
STOP SEXUALIZING SEX
STOP SEXUALIZING SEX
STOP SEXUALIZING SEX
STOP SEXUALIZING SEX
STOP SEXUALIZING SEX
STOP SEXUALIZING SEX
STOP SEXUALIZING SEX
STOP SEXUALIZING SEX
STOP SEXUALIZING SEX
So they supposedly copied you three weeks before you even released that software?
Something clearly doesn’t add up here. You’re claiming ownership over work that, based on what is publicly available, appears to trace back to pre-existing code, including work by @couldbeautism and PSFree.
Just compare these files:
https://t.co/IhsCz5ZK45
https://t.co/j9NwLWm18B
The most absurd part is that it seems all it took was showing an AI the Git history and asking, “Did they copy me?” to get a yes, without actually checking where that code originally came from.
But having a Git history that predates another repository does not automatically prove authorship of the code. You only need to broaden the search a little on GitHub to find earlier material and clear links to work by Jordy and PSFree.
Guys, this situation is genuinely problematic. You cannot claim other people’s work as your own without first properly verifying its origin.
And honestly, it’s sad to see situations like this happen around opensource projects. It’s also one of the reasons why many developers become increasingly reluctant to release their work publicly.
Context:
https://t.co/Ru1ICy5aYT
@Ka_nek1@SpecterDev@Dalio27776950 Completely wrong lol. If theflow could have reported it when he originally planned, it would have been very likely that we could get 14.00 game dumps (including THE game), while also having linux capabilities. Jordy just did it because it was either him or someone else.
@PrismapopS@Clockwork_Tail These animations have been in the work for years apparently. I doubt he could/would change much about it atp. But I agree that he cant even get proper criticism because of the ai era.