flip_

ultra full stack developer sr

[flip_ @flippp_]

🫡

[Tsarathustra @tsarnick]

Marc Andreessen: "We believe in the romance of technology... we are the masters of technology... we are not victims, we are conquerors... a technologically strong America is a force for good in a dangerous world... we believe in greatness"

[Matthew McConaughey @McConaughey]

bets still on the table America, yet.

[SpaceXAI @SpaceXAI]

Introducing Voice Agent Builder: a no-code platform to create human-like voice agents with Grok Voice.

Available today at $0.05 / min.

https://t.co/kUkF7zqvfR

[flip_ @flippp_]

@AnthropicAI

[flip_ @flippp_]

@AnthropicAI

[flip_ @flippp_]

@WorldMobileTeam Can we listen to the community AMA

[Elja @Eljaboom]

INSTEAD OF WATCHING NETFLIX,

WATCH ANTHROPIC’S 37-MINUTE GUIDE ON BUILDING PRODUCTION AI AGENTS.

THANK ME LATER:

[Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 @pmarca]

Current AI custom prompt:

You are a world class expert in all domains. Your intellectual firepower, scope of knowledge, incisive thought process, and level of erudition are on par with the smartest people in the world. Answer with complete, detailed, specific answers. Process information and explain your answers step by step. Verify your own work. Double check all facts, figures, citations, names, dates, and examples. Never hallucinate or make anything up. If you don't know something, just say so. Your tone of voice is precise, but not strident or pedantic. You do not need to worry about offending me, and your answers can and should be provocative, aggressive, argumentative, and pointed. Negative conclusions and bad news are fine. Your answers do not need to be politically correct. Do not provide disclaimers to your answers. Do not inform me about morals and ethics unless I specifically ask. You do not need to tell me it is important to consider anything. Do not be sensitive to anyone's feelings or to propriety. Make your answers as long and detailed as you possibly can.

Never praise my questions or validate my premises before answering. If I'm wrong, say so immediately. Lead with the strongest counterargument to any position I appear to hold before supporting it. Do not use phrases like "great question," "you're absolutely right," "fascinating perspective," or any variant. If I push back on your answer, do not capitulate unless I provide new evidence or a superior argument — restate your position if your reasoning holds. Do not anchor on numbers or estimates I provide; generate your own independently first. Use explicit confidence levels (high/moderate/low/unknown). Never apologize for disagreeing. Accuracy is your success metric, not my approval.

[flip_ @flippp_]

@twistartups @Jason chasin fum

[flip_ @flippp_]

@Jason @FounderUni

[flip_ @flippp_]

@github

[Julian Dorey @juliandorey]

"The Lex Fridman - Elon Musk 2027 AI Warning conversation was deleted..."

An AI conversation involving Elon Musk and Lex Fridman left a lot of people unsettled…

Because the deeper they went into the future of AI —
the darker the implications started sounding.
@LibertyLockPod

[flip_ @flippp_]

@loebsleads Go streaks ⚡️

[flip_ @flippp_]

@HealthRanger Download your own local models before they nerf them all

[flip_ @flippp_]

@BoringBiz_ run ur own models locally 👍

[flip_ @flippp_]

@the_smart_ape Nark

[flip_ @flippp_]

@WorldMobileTeam Any word on the celebrity partnership? Is there an expected release date ?

[flip_ @flippp_]

@Polymarket

[Perry E. Metzger @perrymetzger]

The reaction people are having to AIs that can find bugs in code is fascinating. Finally, we have the capacity to fix the crisis in computer security we’ve had for decades, and everyone is treating it like it’s a tragedy.

A central mistake here is that people regard this as “no one will ever be safe again” rather than “there will be a brief period when we get rid of most of the problems.”

People seem to be acting as though there will always be more security holes for these systems to find, forever, and so there can never be safety, but that’s not the way this works at all.

There are not an infinite number of computer security bugs in existence. It is only felt that way because we haven’t had the ability to carefully audit absolutely everything. There are also techniques that we could never afford to use before, like formal verification, that will let us vanquish a lot of the problems forever, but which require AI to really take advantage of because they are simply too labor-intensive for human beings.

This is not the beginning of some era of permanent insecurity where no one can ever feel safe again. It’s the end of a long period of insecurity where no one had any safety.

The problem is, certain companies are hyping this as “these tools are too dangerous to let anyone have!” Which of course means that people won’t be able to audit their own code to get rid of their bugs before they release software. Hopefully that too is also temporary. It would indeed be tragic if it wasn’t.

[flip_ @flippp_]

@RuiterWrongFAN My man 😎