Adam Hardwick

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@joshmanders @_Sanderr Well that’s where I disagree - it is relevant in my view. But can also understand/accept the counter-argument.

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@joshmanders @_Sanderr Apologies - it thought you were referring to the attribution line; that’s usually what people are complaining about (and what the post before the one I directly replied to was talking about).

That’s odd behaviour - not seen that at all.

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@joshmanders @_Sanderr Eh? Thats not what we were talking about, was it? This is about the attribution line in commits and PRs?

Meh. I think opt out is fine - any rational person will have a quick peruse through the config before using it in anger anyway.

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@joshmanders @_Sanderr I’d argue it is relevant, but I also accept that the counter argument has valid. Either way I don’t think this is outrageous when you can just turn it off.

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@ChalkerShaun @LeeHurstComic Why?

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@IGNorantreturns @deeez_guts @Apogee_Ent You don’t have any pronouns? Are you really sure of that?

Yet another datapoint that suggests a direct link between bigotry and brainrot.

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@ArticleSums @bmay He’s an MP. Part of becoming an elected official is surrendering some of your right to privacy. You are expected to be under greater scrutiny.

There are clear rules about declaring gifts when you become an MP. You need to declare anything you’ve received in the 12 months before.

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@ArticleSums @Maxine2xs @bmay Have you checked the rules? Might want to start there.

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@ArticleSums @bmay He’s an MP. It’s absolutely our business.

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@DadiLahdi @SamCKx You’re either a liar or too stupid to comment.

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@252Calebd @GetonTrightside @Polymarket Careful what you wish for - the bill isn’t what you think it is.

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@andrestopo07 @PinoCalad No it doesn’t. Performative security comes first. They have a pathological need to look “hard”, even if it makes people less safe.

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@nicksortor @TalkWithSally Should have been done 25 years and 7 months ago!

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@BillGunn57529 @HoyasFan07 What “NATO spending”?

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@MisterSentinel @IRanMediaco For the nation attacking another without legal basis? I agree.

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@TKGwrites @BROKENBRITAIN0 @gmpolice Arrested for what?

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@Robert_Massie @RazerWithAKnee Yes - because you’re lied to on a daily basis about “threats” that are either fabricated or exaggerated.

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@Lee41740 @GraceMcGinnity1 @I_amMukhtar That’s not self defence then, is it?

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@Lee41740 @GraceMcGinnity1 @I_amMukhtar Kicking someone in the head is never proportionate, therefore never self defence.

[Adam Hardwick @fluxsource]

@curlyperm2 @MichelleDewbs Bye!