Jon Fly

christ is lord.
Yorkshireman,
English man,
father.
seeker of wisdom and truth.

[Jon Fly @fly_jon63115]

@RedLineReportt @TuckerCNews Memories.

[Jon Fly @fly_jon63115]

@Gill490413 33 degrees?

[Jon Fly @fly_jon63115]

Brilliant dong science.
Should be on the curriculum.

[Selene Mariposa @Selene_Mariposa]

AOC SAYS SHE'S A GIRL'S GIRL. LET ME EXPLAIN GIRLS TO HER LIKE SHE'S THREE. 👧👦

At a town hall in Portland, Maine, AOC said she supports trans women in women's sports "because I'm a girl's girl."

Okay, sweetie. Sit down. Get your juice box. Auntie Selene is going to explain how this works, and I'm going to use small words, because clearly the big ones haven't been working.

There are two kinds of people.

👦 People with a dong.
👧 People with no dong.

That's it. That's the list. Even a toddler at daycare figures this out by snack time.

For thousands of years, dong people were called "men." No-dong people were called "women." It worked great. Nobody needed a town hall.

Now, the rules. Follow along.

📏 RULE 1: You are what you were born with. Not what you bought. Not what you announced. Not what your pronoun sticker says. Born with. That's the whole rule.

🏀 RULE 2: The dong team plays on the dong team. The no-dong team plays on the no-dong team. This is why there's an NBA and a WNBA. See how easy that was? The NBA is going to love this. Finally, a rule simpler than the flopping policy.

🏊 RULE 3: If you have a dong, you don't get to swim in the no-dong pool, run on the no-dong track or change in the no-dong locker room. You get your own. It's very nice. It has a dong sign on the door.

🥇 RULE 4: Medals go to the fastest no-dong in the no-dong race. A UN report found more than 600 female athletes lost over 890 medals to male competitors. Some girl's girl, AOC. Those 600 girls would like a word.

🎓 RULE 5: Scholarships, roster spots and podiums on the no-dong team belong to no-dongs. Period. (Get it? Period? Only one team has those.)

👶 RULE 6: If a three year old can pick the right bathroom door, dong sign or no-dong sign, a Congresswoman can sort a swim meet.

Now let me be clear about me. I am a no-dong person. Proudly. I like dongs. Big fan. Long time supporter. Married one. Four kids should tell you exactly how big a fan. Girly girls love dongs. Some no-dong people don't, and that's okay too. Love who you love. But if two no-dongs want a baby, at some point they're going to need a dong. Or at least some dong by-products. Science doesn't do participation trophies. 😉 And I'm STILL a girly girl. You know why? What I cheer for is my business. What I was born with is what makes me a girl.

You want to be a girl's girl, AOC? Stand up for the girl who trained for 12 years and lost her spot on the podium to someone who went through male puberty. She's a girl. She'd love a girl's girl right about now.

Right now you're a girl at a town hall telling other girls to sit down and clap.

Dong. No dong. Two teams. Nap time. 🧃🦋

[Gabi Decker @realgabidecker]

‼️HAMMERMELDUNG‼️

Wolfgang Wodarg auf X:

Weshalb ist bei gleicher Spritzenzahl die Übersterblichkeit in Deutschland sehr hoch und beim neuen NATO-Mitglied Schweden gleich null?

Die Spritzen-Pandemie war ein gezieltes und international verabredetes gentechnischen Massenexperiment mit Hilfe des Militärs.
Was wir von Anfang an gesehen und vermutet haben, wurde jetzt durch ein interdisziplinäres Team in den USA bestätigt und veröffentlicht:

Spezifische Chargennummern verursachten 4 % mehr Nebenwirkungen als andere. Keine zufällige Variation. Keine Fertigungsinkonsistenz. Ein absichtliches, systematisches Muster.

Quelle: https://t.co/RVZ5UG2Jzr

- Chargennummern, die mit 20A bis 20F enden: Nahezu null Nebenwirkungen. Kochsalzlösung. Placebo. Wasser mit Etikett.

- Chargennummern, die mit 21K bis 21X enden: Moderate Nebenwirkungen. Müdigkeit. Myokarditis. Blutgerinnsel.  Hospitalisierungsraten 300 % über dem Ausgangswert.

- Chargennummern, die mit 22R bis 22Z enden: Katastrophal. Schlaganfall. Herzstillstand. Neurologische Schäden. Sterberaten 8.100 % über der statistischen Norm für jedes pharmazeutische Produkt in der Geschichte.

Drei Stufen. Drei Formeln. Verteilt in einem Muster, das sicherstellte, dass kein einzelnes Krankenhaus, keine einzelne Stadt, keine einzelne Demografie genug katastrophale Dosen erhielt, um ein offensichtliches statistisches Signal auszulösen. Sie verteilten den Schaden dünn genug, um es „seltene Nebenwirkungen“ zu nennen. Aber es war nicht selten. Es war gezielt.

Das Verteilungsmuster war nicht zufällig. Die katastrophalen Chargen wurden überproportional an spezifische Postleitzahlen versendet. Postleitzahlen mit hohen Konzentrationen von Militärveteranen. Ersthelfern. Unabhängigen Unternehmern.  Gemeinschaften mit historisch niedriger Einhaltung föderaler Vorgaben. Die Menschen, die am ehesten Widerstand leisten würden, erhielten die gefährlichsten Dosen.

Die moderaten Chargen gingen an städtische Zentren mit hohem Medienkonsum – Bevölkerungsgruppen, die milde Symptome melden würden, gesagt bekämen, es sei „normal“, und ohne Fragen zu Auffrischungsimpfungen zurückkehren würden.

Die Placebo-Chargen gingen an Politiker, Medienfiguren und pharmazeutische Führungskräfte. Die Menschen, die es vor der Kamera beworben haben. Die Menschen, die Ihnen sagten, es sei „sicher und wirksam“, während sie Kochsalzlösung erhielten. Sie haben denselben Schuss im Fernsehen genommen. Sie haben nicht dieselbe Formel genommen.

Die 12.000 Chargennummern sind nun kartiert. Jede Charge. Jedes Ziel. Jedes Ergebnis. Die Daten sind auf der Blockchain. Sie können nicht zurückgezogen werden. Der ehemalige FDA-Regulierer im Team reichte den Datensatz mit einer einzigen Erklärung beim Militärtribunal ein: „Das war keine Fahrlässigkeit. Das war ein Waffeneinsatzprotokoll, getarnt als öffentliche Gesundheit.“

Eurostat Auswertung-Danke Tom Lausen

[Owen Lewis @is_OwenLewis]

Here’s a rather extraordinary discovery: humanity seems to have interrupted the beginning of the next ice age. We thought it might happen in the future, but the evidence suggests it's already happened.

A new study in Science argues that the next major glaciation had already begun roughly 2,000 years ago, before modern warming reversed the trend in the 20th century.

The evidence comes from the Barnes Ice Cap on Baffin Island, the last surviving remnant of the enormous Laurentide Ice Sheet that once covered much of Canada and reached as far south as Illinois.

Because Barnes is frozen directly to its bedrock, advancing ice buries and preserves vegetation beneath it. Researchers radiocarbon dated plants emerging as the ice retreats to reconstruct its history.

They found that after melting to a minimum extent around 3,000 years ago, the ice began expanding again about 2,000 years ago. The researchers interpret this as the earliest stage of the next glacial period.

Left to natural orbital cycles, that cooling would have unfolded extremely slowly, potentially taking tens of thousands of years to rebuild a continent spanning ice sheet.

But around 1960, the trend reversed. Summers became warm enough that Barnes began losing more ice than it gained, despite Northern Hemisphere summer sunlight continuing to slowly decline in a way that should favor renewed glaciation. Greenhouse warming had (thankfully) overwhelmed the natural cooling tendency.

The Barnes ice cap may now disappear entirely within the next few centuries, removing the final remnant of an ice sheet that repeatedly served as the nucleus for much larger glaciations.

There is a remarkable deep time perspective here. For millions of years, orbital cycles have pushed Earth between warmer interglacials and colder glacial periods. According to this study, that ancient cycle had started turning once again.

Then, in the geological equivalent of an instant, humanity pushed hard enough in the opposite direction to stop it.

Just so we're clear, this is a very very good thing.

📸 Geology Sciences

Sources:
1) https://t.co/jZGNFULiXU

2) https://t.co/l64Zh9pR41

[Adam | Faithful Messenger @Adam_FaithfulM]

For twelve years, nobody touched her.

Mark 5:25. A certain woman who had an issue of blood for twelve years.

Under the Law of Moses, a woman with a flow of blood that wouldn’t stop was unclean for as long as it lasted. Leviticus 15:25. Anything she lay on, anything she sat on, was unclean. Anyone who touched her was unclean.

Twelve years.

No hand on her shoulder. No embrace from her mother. No husband, and if she’d had one, he’d likely been gone a long time. No temple. Every room she walked into, people stepped back.

And she’d spent everything trying to fix it.

Mark 5:26. And had suffered many things of many physicians, and had spent all that she had, and was nothing bettered, but rather grew worse.

Now read Luke’s version. Luke was a physician himself.

Luke 8:43. Which had spent all her living upon physicians, neither could be healed of any.

The doctor quietly leaves out the line about getting worse under doctors. Mark the fisherman put it in.

She was broke. Sick. Untouchable. And she had one idea left.

But she wasn’t the one Jesus was going to see that day.

Back up a few verses. A man named Jairus, a ruler of the synagogue, a respected man, has thrown himself at Jesus’s feet in front of the whole town.

Mark 5:23. My little daughter lieth at the point of death.

His only daughter, Luke says. And Mark tells you how old she was.

Mark 5:42. She was of the age of twelve years.

Twelve.

The year that girl was born, the woman started bleeding.

For twelve years, Jairus had a daughter growing up in his house: first steps, first words, laughing at the table. For the same twelve years, the woman had been slowly dying in the street.

And on the same morning, one was at the end of her life, and the other was out of options.

Jesus is walking to Jairus’s house. The crowd is crushing in. And the woman who, by law, should not be in that crowd at all, pushes her way through behind Him.

Mark 5:28. For she said, If I may touch but his clothes, I shall be whole.

Matthew and Luke tell you exactly what she touched. The hem. The border of His garment.

In Greek, kraspedon. It’s the word used for the tassels a Jewish man wore on the four corners of his robe, commanded in Numbers 15, to remember the commandments of the LORD.

And the Hebrew word for the corners where those tassels hung is kanaf. It also means wing.

Malachi 4:2. But unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings.

Healing in His wings. She reached for the corner of His robe.

And she was healed. Instantly. Mark says she felt in her body that the fountain of her blood was dried up.

She could have slipped away. Nobody would have known.

Jesus stopped.

Mark 5:30. Jesus, immediately knowing in himself that virtue had gone out of him, turned him about in the press, and said, Who touched my clothes?

His disciples almost laughed at Him. Hundreds of people are touching You.

But He kept looking. And she came forward, shaking, and fell down, and told Him all the truth in front of everyone.

Why didn’t He let her go quietly?

Because she didn’t just need to be healed. She needed to be seen healed. Twelve years of the whole town knowing she was unclean; now the whole town heard Him declare her whole.

Mark 5:34. And he said unto her, Daughter, thy faith hath made thee whole; go in peace, and be whole of thy plague.

Daughter.

It’s the only time in the gospels Jesus addresses a woman by that word.

He’s on His way to save one man’s daughter, and He stops in the street to call a forgotten woman His.

Now feel what Jairus felt during that conversation.

Mark 5:35. While he yet spake, there came from the ruler of the synagogue’s house certain which said, Thy daughter is dead: why troublest thou the Master any further?

His girl died while Jesus was stopped in the road for someone else.

Jesus heard it. And before Jairus could speak, He said one sentence.

Mark 5:36. Be not afraid, only believe.

He walked into the house. Put out the mourners who laughed at Him. Took the girl by the hand.

Mark 5:41. Talitha cumi. Little girl, I say unto thee, arise.

And she got up and walked. Twelve years old. And then Jesus told them to give her something to eat.

Now look at what happened to the law that day.

Under Moses, uncleanness spread by touch. The unclean woman touched you, you became unclean. You touched a corpse; you became unclean. Numbers 19:11.

That day a bleeding woman touched Jesus. And He took a dead girl by the hand.

By the law, He should have been unclean twice before lunch.

Instead, the woman became clean. And the dead girl got up.

With Him, it runs the other way. He doesn’t catch your uncleanness. You catch His life.

Now you.

Some of you are the woman. You’ve been sick a long time, or ashamed a long time, or alone a long time. You’ve spent everything, money, years, every doctor, every program, every fix, and you’re not better. You’re worse. And you’ve stopped expecting anyone to touch you.

Reach.

Not perfectly. Not with the right words. Through the crowd, from behind, with the last faith you’ve got. He feels it. He’ll turn around. And He’ll call you something you haven’t been called in years.

And some of you are Jairus. You prayed. You begged. He said He’d come. And then He stopped for someone else, and while He was stopped, the news came. It’s over. Don’t bother Him anymore.

He’s not late. He was never late.

He saved two daughters that morning. The delay for one was the miracle for the other.

Be not afraid.

Only believe.

[June Slater @juneslater17]

Why I'm optimistic 👇

For twelve years I've been banging on about this and now people are finally seeing it, evolving communism, cultural Marxism or whatever label you choose, it's all the same.

The EU was never just about trade. It's a communist style structure. Centralised control. Unelected people at the top telling elected people at the bottom what they can do. You vote one way, they ignore you, and carry on anyway. How many times have we seen that?

People ask how did we get here? It didn't happen overnight. It's generational.

Go back to the sixties. You had all those left wing students demonstrating. CND, sit-ins, banners, shouting down anyone who disagreed. At the time we thought it was just students being students.

Those indoctrinated students? They became the professors. They became the teachers, the lecturers, the BBC producers, the civil servants, the judges, the Archbishops, the people running the charities. The EU commission, NATO bosses, NGOs, UN officials etc

And they taught the next generation. And that generation taught the next one. That's three generations now.

There is a famous saying from the German student leader Rudi Dutschke. He talked about t
The Long March through the institutions. And that's exactly what happened.

You don't need to attack a public building with violence . That's too obvious. You just need to attack all the things within it.

You attack the family - tell people the family is outdated, that mothers shouldn't be at home, that children belong to the state.

You create such a costly environment, where buying bricks and mortar is impossible, a family today can't but a house with two wages, that keeps the mother at work, the child in third party hands for 8 hours a day in formative years.

The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world, who's rocking your cradle.

You attack the church - tell people faith is bigotry, close the churches, laugh at Christians while protecting religions with very like-minded controlling doctrines.

You attack the schools - stop teaching history properly, stop teaching right from wrong, teach children to be ashamed of their own country.

Encourage people not to work, to be dependent on the state. If the state controls you're income, it controls what you spend it on .

You can never get out, or grow.

You attack law and borders - tell people that a country that controls its border is racist.

By the time you have done all that, you still have the same buildings - Parliament, the courts, the schools, the churches - but they mean something completely different. They have been hollowed out from the inside.

That is what the EU is. It's the perfect vehicle for it. Laws made far away, that you can't vote out, that overrule your own courts and your own Parliament. It's control by committee. That's not democracy. That's communism by another name.

Even worse quangos that control the news you see, the products you buy, the food you eat. Additives that benefit a few fed to the whole
Nation despite health issues

I voted Brexit because I saw it. A lot of us did. Some places voted 70% for less immigration and for control back, and we were told we were wrong.

But now with AI we can look it up ourselves. We don't have to take their word for it anymore. We can follow the money, see who funds what, who sits on what board, and we can share it with each other.

They can't hide it anymore,
Musk opened The Twitter Files and showed the world what's really going on, we've information is power we have direct access to it and have grown in strength.

Their Long March has been uninterrupted for decades, be patient, keep talking , keep sharing, they'll never reach the finish line.
That's why I'm optimistic ❤️
.

[Jon Fly @fly_jon63115]

@brivael No I'm not wearing seat belts,crashing reminds me of the fragility of the human existence.

[Jon Fly @fly_jon63115]

@InsideLucysHead So they were clueless?

[Race 🕊️ @multiplanet1]

In 2013, Elon Musk published a 58 page technical paper describing a new transportation system called the Hyperloop: a pod traveling through a low pressure tube at 700 miles per hour, connecting Los Angeles to San Francisco in 30 minutes. The paper included engineering specifications, cost estimates, route planning, and aerodynamic calculations. Then he released it. For free. No patent. No company. No ownership claim. He gave it to the world and told anyone who wanted to build it to go ahead.

The decision baffled the business world. A detailed engineering blueprint for a potentially revolutionary transportation system, produced at significant cost in engineering time, was published as open source. Any company, any government, any university could take the design and build it without paying Elon a dollar. The intellectual property was handed over voluntarily.

He explained the decision with a logic that sounds insane until you understand how he thinks: he was too busy with SpaceX and Tesla to build the Hyperloop himself, but the concept was too important to sit unrealized in a filing cabinet. The choice was between: (1) patent it, build a company around it in 10 years when he had bandwidth, and delay the technology by a decade, or (2) release it now and let the world build it faster than he could alone. He chose speed over ownership.

The paper inspired the creation of multiple companies (Virgin Hyperloop, Hyperloop Transportation Technologies) and student competitions at universities worldwide. The concept is now being developed across multiple countries. None of the companies pay Elon. None of them are required to credit him. The idea that he spent millions developing is being built by strangers who owe him nothing.

The decision reveals a hierarchy of values that most executives cannot comprehend: speed of civilization's advancement ranks above personal ownership of the advancement. He would rather the world have the technology sooner than he have the revenue from it later. The calculation prioritizes the species over the individual. It is the same calculation that drives SpaceX's open approach to rocket data. The mission outranks the profit.

A man gave away a billion dollar idea because he didn't have time to build it and the world needed it sooner than his schedule allowed. The paper is still free. The concept is being built. The person who designed it gets nothing. He considers this the correct outcome.

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

This is one of the most illiberal, invasive and appalling pieces of legislation ever to come before Parliament.

The Conversion Practices Bill isn’t about preventing gay children from being abusively coerced into being straight. That is already rightly illegal.

It will criminalise well-intentioned conversations between parents and gender-confused children, discussions with therapists, and religious leaders sharing their faith’s teachings with their congregations.

A parent could face up to five years in prison simply for trying to dissuade their child from embarking on irreversible, dangerous and life-changing medical pathways before the age of 18.

In his letter to the pre-legislative scrutiny committee, the Minister for Equalities attempts to reassure us that the bill respects “freedom of religion and parental rights”.

It does no such thing.

So much for the Labour Government’s promise to tread more lightly on our lives. It is not the state’s role to dictate what conversations parents can have with their young children around the dinner table.

Parents know best — not ministers.

Read the letter below 👇

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

If we want the world to get better, we'll have to accept one thing: some people really are exceptional, and they really do create value.

I've explained how the system works. Now I'm going to tell you why Elon Musk is under attack.

It isn't because of his tweets or his positions. It runs deeper than that. Elon Musk is under attack because he exists.

In a world built on egalitarianism, the exceptional individual is an anomaly. Worse, he's a threat. Left free, he creates gaps: he produces more value, he moves faster, he climbs higher. Every gap he creates proves that the egalitarian project rests on a lie, the lie that we're all interchangeable.

Kurt Vonnegut saw it back in 1961 in a chilling short story, Harrison Bergeron. In an America made perfectly equal, the strong are weighed down, the beautiful are masked, and the most intelligent have their thoughts scrambled by piercing noises so that nobody rises above anybody. That isn't some distant dystopia. It's the ultimate logic of this system. If equality of outcome is the goal, then excellence is the enemy.

Here's a truth almost nobody dares to say: humanity moves forward through geniuses.

Look across the centuries. Aristotle founds logic. Gutenberg prints and sets knowledge free. Copernicus and Galileo move the Earth. Descartes and Pascal give reason its method. Newton writes the laws of the universe. Pasteur defeats microbes. Darwin explains life. Turing invents computing. Every time, one mind, a single one, tips history over.

In 1905, special relativity was in the air, and others were getting close. But general relativity, without Einstein, we might still be waiting for. And the digital revolution as we lived it, from the personal computer to a phone in every pocket, wouldn't look the way it does without Steve Jobs.

We almost always admire these geniuses once they're dead. Galileo had to recant on his knees. Semmelweis, who understood that washing hands was enough to save mothers, died in an asylum, mocked by his peers. Turing, who helped win the war, was convicted and then chemically castrated. Van Gogh sold almost nothing in his lifetime.

And then there's Nikola Tesla. The man who invented the electric world we still live in: the alternating current that powers our homes, the induction motor, the foundations of wireless transmission. He dreamed of sending energy freely across the planet. When J.P. Morgan stopped funding him, his Wardenclyffe tower was abandoned, then demolished. He ended his life alone, buried in debt, in a New York hotel room, feeding pigeons. He was found dead in January 1943, at 86. The man who electrified the world died with almost nothing.

The irony of history: his name is now written on millions of cars, the cars of the company Elon Musk took to the top. As if history wanted to pay its debt.

The system has always hated those who surpassed it, and it only celebrates them once they can no longer bother it.

It's hard to accept, but it's reality. It doesn't mean geniuses have more rights than anyone else. Before the law, before justice, and in their dignity, all people are equal, and they must stay that way. It means that some individuals, through their talent, their courage, and their risk-taking, create a thousand times, a million times, a billion times more value than ordinary people. And they don't keep that value for themselves. All of humanity benefits from it.

Elon Musk is one of those men.

He revived space exploration when governments had turned away from it. He forced the entire auto industry into a new century. With Starlink, he brought the internet to the most isolated corners of the planet. Every time, he was told it was impossible. Every time, he risked everything, and every time, he won.

He is the first person in history to cross a trillion dollars. People want him to apologize for it. I say the opposite: he deserves it, and he deserves much more. The value he's creating for humanity, with reusable rockets, the electrification of the world, and the road to Mars, is beyond any comparison with what he owns.

His fortune wasn't taken from anyone. It was created where there was nothing.

That's exactly what the system can't forgive him for.

In their worldview, nobody should be above anybody. Success is suspect, wealth is theft, excellence is an injustice to be corrected. Elon Musk is living, dazzling, unbearable proof that their model is wrong: a free man with talent and courage can create more value than all their administrations combined. As long as he exists, their story doesn't hold. So he has to be destroyed. The lawsuits, the investigations, the press campaigns, and the regulatory threats all come from there.

But here's what makes me deeply optimistic.

The system is cracking. It bet that people would end up preferring equality in mediocrity to freedom in excellence, and it lost. People saw the rockets come back and land. They saw what a single man could accomplish when nobody stopped him from acting. And they understood they had been lied to.

What's coming is a new world, built on real meritocracy. Not a world where the same people inherit the same seats, but a world where everyone gets to play. The child of a factory worker, a farmer, or an immigrant can get in the game, and if he's good, he rises fast. Very fast. As high as his talent takes him.

The equality worth defending is equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome. The first sets geniuses free. The second smothers them.

We think it's normal for a soccer player to earn a fortune because he's exceptional with a ball. We think it's suspicious for an engineer to get rich by bringing rockets back from space. The world will be better the day kids have Elon Musk posters on their bedroom walls, the way they have posters of Messi and Ronaldo.

Humanity never moved forward thanks to people who wanted nobody to stand out. It moved forward thanks to those who dared to outrun everyone.

Elon Musk is one of them. And this time, history won't wait until he's dead to recognize it.

[Richard @ricwe123]

Now why did so many people in eastern Ukraine voted to join Russia?

Just listen to what former Ukrainian President Poroshenko said about them, and you’ll understand......

[Jon Fly @fly_jon63115]

Effective.

[Sprinter Press @Sprinter_Press]

🇨🇳 Chinese cop showed who's the real Kung Fu master while arresting a criminal.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

🚨🚨 THE ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK / THE DEMOCRACY FILES: A PRIMER 🚨

I will be using this thread to track all drops, so bookmark it.

I spent most of yesterday backing everything (now 312 gigabytes) up in various sources and getting the materials out to others. I also produced an AI video (below) to explain the whole thing to others are not on 𝕏 - feel free to distribute.

Here's the primer:

USAID, the foreign aid agency, had a democracy office. Inside the agency, it was called DRG.

Officially, DRG administered "democracy assistance." They'd go inside countries they thought were sliding into authoritarianism and help the opposition there. That assistance included election monitoring, judicary support, independent media, and civil society building.

You may have heard the term "color revolution." The model comes from Serbia in 2000, where trained student activists brought down Milosevic with the help of Western governments, after sustained protests. With the help of USAID's democracy office, this model was implemented in many other countries to topple governments: Georgia's "Rose Revolution" in 2003, Ukraine's "Orange Revolution" in 2004, and many more.

Then last year, DOGE shut down USAID. But the USAID democracy office didn't stop. They formed a group called the Democracy Renewal Group, the same initials as their office (USAID Democracy, Human Rights, Governance). Their goal: apply their own playbook to the United States itself.

This goal became a plan, called Renew American Democracy (RAD). It invoked the "4 B's" framework. Block - use lawfare and protests to make life harder for the Trump administration. Bridge & Belong - control dialogue and win people over. The final and most important B is Build. Build means redesigning the American government itself, and the crisis is the opening.

In their own words:
"We can take that breakdown moment and leverage it for a big structural reform, you know, refounding moment." - Danielle Reiff, DRG lead.

Calls show DRG working alongside DSA on ideas of creating a different government, one that does away with the Constitution itself.

DRG does not run the Block operations. They hand it to UDA, the United Democracy Alliance. One organizer calls it a "huge galaxy": lawsuits, street protests, non-cooperation. They list No Kings, Indivisible, MoveOn, 50501, and many other mega-activist NGOs among their members.

Another organizer calls UDA Erica Chenoweth's project. Chenoweth is the Harvard professor behind the three-and-half-percent rule of regime change: get that share of a country's populace onto the streets, and historically, the movement wins.

The UDA is very "hush-hush." They have no website, no roster, no filings.

Then come the red lines: things the Trump administration could do, such as calling the Insurrection Act on protesters, that would mean that the federal government, in their words, "crosses the threshold into illegitimacy." Nobody voted on those lines. There was no public debate. These red lines were developed within secretive working groups, and in a paper addressed to governors and staff.

In the words of Reiff/DRG:
"So that if there is a red line crossed in terms of a Constitutional crisis, like everyone's already pre-organized. And so Mike Smith actually said, he goes, oh, you guys have the day after tomorrow plan."

Cross a line, and the paper's options include states refusing to lend their resources to federal officials, and governors convening what it calls a "Third Continential Congress."

Running the UDA's Insurrection Act working group: Rear Admiral Mike Smith (RET) of National Security Leaders of America (NSL4A). NSL4A is also credited with operationalizing UDA, the blocking operations. NSL4A consists of about 1,600 ex-officers, spies, diplomats. They're turning red lines into indicators and running a situation room to monitor them throughout the midterms and beyond.

The NSL4A's lawyers told them to stop recording meetings in case of subpoenas. But the rest of the network continued to record. DRG works in conjunction with Renew to Thrive (R2T), which ended up accidentally publishing 400+ calls and thousands of documents. These calls and documents were never meant for our eyes, but it's them, on tape.

Thousands of NGOs and billions of dollars are involved in this endeavor. Most of them believe they're saving democracy. The problem is that people who spent their careers deciding when other countries' governments had lost their legitimacy wrote that test for ours, in private, and planned for what comes after.

Who decides when your government is legitimate?

[Jon Fly @fly_jon63115]

@RealDrJaneRuby Well said.
I like my truth to be sassy.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

It's been months that I keep saying Hitler was far left. Every time, thousands of clowns show up in my replies to give me history lessons.

So I made a video to answer all these low IQ takes at once.

Topic closed. Next.

[Jon Fly @fly_jon63115]

@SBarrettBar I chuckle when the lefties throw the Hitler accusation.

[Dangerous Thoughts @DangerousThinkg]

Zelenskyy is believed to have purchased more real estate

This time in Canada, a veritable fortress

Western leaders keep sending billions - Zelenskyy keeps buying real estate that can survive the end of the world
(or at least the end of his Presidency)

At this point a $42M bunker isn’t a contingency plan -  it’s an exit strategy.

While this feels odd, it is in character for Zelenskyy who did visit Canada and tour that property with PM Carney as reported by the Toronto Sun in December of 2025

[Jon Fly @fly_jon63115]

@dogeofficialceo Aww,thanks dude.
God bless you.

[Jon Fly @fly_jon63115]

Crooked Joe.

[Oversight Project @ItsYourGov]

NEW EVIDENCE: New documents released today shed light on the scope of "Operation Round River" a FBI conspiracy to bury Biden family corruption by relabeling it "Russian disinformation.”

Read the thread🧵