sudonym

[sudonym @fnt]

@StoopsTheCat @Mctoon27 @StoopsTheCat

[sudonym @fnt]

@did8hurtu @TUSMBOX Did he WHAT flat earth website. Day? That sentence didn't make any sense.
I seriously hope the irony is not lost on you.

[sudonym @fnt]

@FTFEofficial The problem with flerfs helicopter argument, is they often forget, hovering a helicopter is an active process, with constant inputs provided the pilot. Do flerfs expect the helicopter to get to a certain altitude, and then the pilot lets go of the controls and hopes for the best.

[sudonym @fnt]

@Keith72718138 Because they used a hypergolic propellant, hydrazine.
I'm confused, why type that into X instead of google. 🙃

[sudonym @fnt]

@did8hurtu Still, way way way better than a flat earther.

[sudonym @fnt]

@truthache68 @FlatEarthDaveX That there is what we call in the business, a peeled potato

[sudonym @fnt]

@vegastarr Can you tell me what direction is the direction vector in the density equation?

Also look up summation of forces while you are there.

[sudonym @fnt]

@FTFEofficial Also flerfs will just keep on moving the goal posts, NASA ain't got time for that.

[sudonym @fnt]

@flatsmackin This took me, what 10 seconds on google. https://t.co/vf69iWXa6r

You did research this right? I mean real research, not flat earth research.

[sudonym @fnt]

@BillSPreston11 I love that flat earthers use a calculator that calculates based on "light travels in straight lines"
Does earth not have an atmosphere? Is that air that flat earthers are breathing? I guess not, using that earth curve calculator they think we live in a vacuum.

[sudonym @fnt]

@AdonaiOnGaia The "not in focus" section has all been blurred uniformly with Gaussian blur in Photoshop.

And flat earthers have the gall to cry Photoshop. Gotta lie to flerf.

[sudonym @fnt]

@James_Hawke1 Wow, what a pivot. Feel free to do the maths to show the power requirements for geostationary satellites would not be sufficient.

[sudonym @fnt]

@James_Hawke1 "power to overcome distance", tell that to Voyager 1 and 2.
Comparing a 'city radio station" (terrestrial) to satellite power requirements it not a valid comparison. Terrestrial signals can be attenuated by terrain, buildings, vegetation, precipitation.

[sudonym @fnt]

@plain_see .... but really its just glare.

Finished it for you.

[sudonym @fnt]

@Tayler7777777 Waiting for you to focus it.. waiting... waiting.. oh video ended.

[sudonym @fnt]

@did8hurtu Waiting for you to focus it.. waiting... waiting.. oh video ended.

[sudonym @fnt]

@AdonaiOnGaia "There are no rotating masses" That rules out and jet engines, and propellers.

What do you think propels most planes?

[sudonym @fnt]

@Macka254 You make a very compelling argument. That flat eathers can't provide anything more than... "it looks flat"

[sudonym @fnt]

@plain_see Yep, level in relation to the surface of a globe. Mmmm look at that CRISP horizon.