Hitesh Fofariya

[Shikhar Dhawan @SDhawan25]

Talent doesn’t wait for age, and Vaibhav keeps proving it 👏🇮🇳 A 29-ball 94 and the fastest List A fifty. Fearless, exciting and full of intent. Keep shining, champ 🙌

[Nithyaa Saravanan @NstgIndia]

@fofariya @RBI @DFS_India @FinMinIndia @HDFC_Bank @HDFCBank_Cares All are corrupted
@RBI @DFS_India @FinMinIndia asked how my name added to 35cr loan, i would have saved 3yrs
Even after @HDFC_Bank MD told i am Guarantor no one demanded docs to add and remove from loan
@HDFCBankNews trying to cover 35cr issue with 10k
Lied to Police @RBI

[Hitesh Fofariya @fofariya]

@RBI @DFS_India @FinMinIndia
Kindly do KYB ( Know Your Bank ) which are very inefficient in working, specifically @HDFC_Bank Anjar and Chitrakut Branch, having Branch Code 001447 and 008795.

Kindly arrange rating method for branch efficiency for public service.
@HDFCBank_Cares

[Taxology India @taxologyin]

Hey @Infosys_GSTN,

I have already tried the regular support channels and raised ticket, but unfortunately, no proper solution has been provided so far.

I am facing an issue while uploading a B2B transaction exceeding ₹2.5 lakh in a Rule 14A registration after withdrawal from the said rule and receipt of the withdrawal order in April 2026.

As per Rule 14A, a taxpayer is permitted to furnish output tax liability exceeding ₹2.5 lakh from the first day of the succeeding month in which the withdrawal order is issued. Since the order was issued in April 2026, the restriction should cease to apply from May 2026 onwards.

However, when I attempt to report the transaction in May 2026, the portal continues to throw an error stating that output tax liability cannot exceed ₹2.5 lakh. (Screenshot attached)

This appears to be a system issue where the withdrawal order is not being correctly reflected in the portal validations.

Requesting @Infosys_GSTN and GSTN technical team to provide a genuine resolution instead of generic responses, and to rectify the system logic so that taxpayers who have valid withdrawal orders are not prevented from complying with the law.

Looking forward to an actionable solution at the earliest.

[Hitesh Fofariya @fofariya]

@YagneshPuri Time Cycle Ka Muhurat Nikal ke De Do !!!

Ho Jayega, Time Sahi Rahega To !!!

[Hitesh Fofariya @fofariya]

@GujaratFirst Looks likes planning for Name Change
" Gujarat Last "
" AI Sathe, Potana Mate "

[CA Anupam Sharma @caanupam7]

FIR Against an Advocate for Filing a GST Appeal!

In a deeply disturbing case, an Advocate was arraigned as an accused in an FIR merely for filing a statutory GST appeal on behalf of his client and making the mandatory pre-deposit through the Electronic Credit Ledger based on a particular interpretation of law.

The allegation? That the Advocate had “conspired” with the assessee simply because he adopted a legal position while discharging his professional duty.

Coming down heavily on this alarming misuse of criminal law, the Allahabad High Court in Samarpan Jain vs State of U.P. quashed the FIR, chargesheet and cognizance order against the Advocate.

The Court made some profoundly important observations:

“If, for doing a professional act, like preferring an appeal, an Advocate is to be held in conspiracy with his client, it would be the end of the very existence of the Bar.”

The Court further observed that prosecuting lawyers for acts done in their professional capacity would strike at the very roots of the justice delivery system and the citizen’s invaluable right to legal assistance.

An Advocate may be right, wrong or even “utterly wrong” in his interpretation of law — but that can never, by itself, convert professional representation into a criminal conspiracy.

[Hitesh Fofariya @fofariya]

@sharadjhun @KAnantrao Om Shanti

[Hitesh Fofariya @fofariya]

@YagneshPuri Time Cycle ready for that ?

[Hitesh Fofariya @fofariya]

@YagneshPuri Absolutely Right 👍

[CA. Deep Koradia @DEEPKORADIA]

Dear @GSTATofficial

Appeal with Aadhar based verification is getting failed since many days, not all tax payer have the DSC, pls lookinto

[Hitesh Fofariya @fofariya]

@Infosys_GSTN @nsitharaman @cbic_india @FinMinIndia @EconomicTimes

Matter to be looked after on serious note bcoz it's effect business operation. There are so many genuine cases where GST3B filing late due to medical emergency and other valid reason.

[CA. Deep Koradia @DEEPKORADIA]

Suspension of GSTIN for delay in filing GSTR-3B by even 5–10 days? If you are facing this issue, here’s my take published in @EconomicTimes

This issue has persisted for couple of years, especially with State authorities. In discussions with ground-level officers, the common response has been that such actions are being taken under instructions from higher authorities.

This needs urgent attention so genuine businesses do not suffer due to minor filing delays.

@neelanjitdas

[Abhas Halakhandi @AbhasHalakhandi]

Taxpayers/professionals are currently facing several technical/practical issues with revamped TRACES Portal.

Please comment with the issue you are facing right now on TRACES along with screen shot

I will collate all genuine issues & submit them to CA @pankajgshah - Vice-Chairman @dtc_icai , for taking them up with the Department at Central Level

I will start with the first one - TAN/PAN mismatch in case of LLP/Company registration.

While registering TAN of a Company/LLP, the system is asking to link TAN with PAN through the TAN change Request form. While Incorporation, both PAN and TAN are allotted by the Dept. & mentioned on the same Certificate of Incorporation.

No seperate linking required!!
@IncomeTaxIndia

[Chartered Accountants Association, Surat @caas_org]

📋 CAAS vs UOI — SCA/16428/2025
Status Update | 27th April 2026
On 7th April 2026, the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court had directed CBDT to file an affidavit suggesting remedial measures, noting 11 years of non-compliance with the Court's own 2015 direction to release ITR utilities by 1st April every year.
On 27th April 2026, no affidavit was filed by CBDT. Court noted the "complexity involved in the issues raised" involving "multi-stakeholder, multi-tiered institutional process."
Matter now listed on 23rd June 2026 — after Summer Vacation.
Meanwhile:
👉 58 days into AY 2026-27
👉 ITR utilities: Not released
👉 Portal readiness: Awaited
👉 CBDT's affidavit: Awaited
👉 Compliance with 2015 direction: 11th year running — Awaited
CAAS remains committed to pursuing this matter to its logical and legal conclusion, at every forum available under the Constitution.

#CAAS #CBDT #IncomeTax #GujHC #TaxProfessionals

[Hitesh Fofariya @fofariya]

@nsitharaman @IncomeTaxIndia
Kindly consider ground reality of implementation of 194T @ 10%

Either completely remove or revise rate to realistic level.

[सुधीर हालाखंडी Sudhir Halakhandi @Sudhirhalakhndi]

Income Tax Section 194T - कल तक partners Interest और remuneration पर करोड़ों रुपये TDS के रूप में जमा हुए हैं जो छोटी और मझौली firms के अधिकांश मामलों में Partners को Refund होगा ।
भविष्य के लिए इस प्रावधान पर तार्किक विचार कर उचित परिवर्तन किया जाना उचित होगा ।

[Ram Bajaj @rambajajgst]

Retweet For Support

Professionals and taxpayers want to pay TDS but your infrastructure is so world class that it doesnt supports anything!

HUMBLE APPEAL TO EXTEND DUE DATE NOW @IncomeTaxIndia

Ram Bajaj
8696424223

For GST Update, Join this Group
https://t.co/ryw403UGsa

[CA Himank Singla @CAHimankSingla]

Thankyou @IncomeTaxIndia for your world-class portal.

If you guys have any shame or accountability (although my hopes are 0%) you will extend due date by atleast 1 day for YOUR OWN FAULT!

Professionals and taxpayers want to pay TDS but your infrastructure is so world class that it doesnt supports anything!

HUMBLE APPEAL TO EXTEND DUE DATE NOW 🙏🏻

[Anuj daga @Anujdaga16]

@IncomeTaxIndia @cbdt the income tax portal for tds payments of 31st March not working. Please extend the due date for tds payments of 31st March

[Rohit Jain @rohitjain2021]

Dear @IncomeTaxIndia
Section 194T is just plain stupid.
Thanks for your attention to this matter.

[CA Himank Singla @CAHimankSingla]

This is not the real headache.

The real headache is that all such small partnership firms who never had TAN or deducted TDS are now applying TAN as they have to deduct TDS on Partner's remuneration & interest just for a meagre sum exceeding Rs. 20,000/-

They will also file TDS return and generate TDS certificate... but guess what, most partners will ultimately claim 100% refund of TDS as their incomes won't exceed Rs. 12,00,000/-... 🤷🏻‍♂️

20K is a very small limit and Section 194T is adding unnecessary compliance and cash flow crunch to businesses! 😤