Follower Crazy

Check out my podcast The Fascist New World Order:

[Follower Crazy @FollowerCrazy]

https://t.co/TV1DSiaNXG

#music #ebm

[DFF @DumbFxckFinder]

Oh dang lmao

[Ryan B @Network_Guy8]

LMAO! Who did this? 🤣

[AJ Jaff @aj_geo_analysis]

𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽 𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗔𝗱𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝗡𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗲𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗛𝗲 𝗙𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗜𝗿𝗮𝗻. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝗞𝗻𝗲𝘄. 𝗛𝗶𝘀 𝗜𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗿 𝗖𝗶𝗿𝗰𝗹𝗲 𝗗𝗶𝗱 𝗡𝗼𝘁.

In an exclusive @CNBC "Meet the Press" interview, Trump was asked the question that defines this entire war with Iran.

Reporter asks: "You have been saying for months that Iran is BEGGING to make a deal, they are so desperate. Why have they not made a deal with you?"

Trump's answer: "It's a very hard thing for them. They have had great independence. They've dealt with weak and ineffective leadership on behalf of the USA."

The reporter pressed. "If they are so desperate, why haven't they said yes to your terms?"

Trump: "Because they are strong and proud. They have had independence for 47 years."

Read that twice. Bookmark this. The man who ordered the strikes on February 28, 2026 just publicly conceded the opposite of the case HE made for them.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗱𝗺𝗶��𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿

You do NOT call your adversary "strong and proud" with 47 years of independence if they are begging. You do NOT cite their dignity if you have broken them. Trump's own language, in his own interview, on his own network of choice, contradicts every claim made by his administration since February that Iran was on the verge of capitulation. He did NOT mean to say it. The mask slipped.

The Iranian regime is NOT begging, we all assumed, but now the President told us and confirmed it on National TV. It never was. The administration's entire "strategic" premise is publicly cracking on national television, and almost NOBODY is catching it.

𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗶𝗴𝗻 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘆 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗨𝗦 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗮𝗱𝗲

There is a specific reason NO previous American president attacked the "Islamic Republic" of Iran at this scale. They were adequately briefed. They understood the calculus. Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush 41, Clinton, Bush 43, Obama, Biden- - that is ELEVEN separate Presidents and 12 Administrations.

Each one was given the same fundamental Security Risk Assessment, intelligence dossiers, briefings, scenarios and war-game planning.

Iran is NOT Iraq.

Iran is not Libya.

Iran is not Syria.

Iran is a 90 million-person "revolutionary state" with a 47-year institutional memory, that has built its infrastructure outside the US sanctions, a seven-layer chain of command, the deepest hardened underground military infrastructure on Earth, a doctrinally calibrated proxy network spanning at least five countries, and a voter base that has been preparing for EXACTLY this scenario since 1979.

Every previous administration looked at that briefing and stepped back. Trump did NOT.

BUT...Why?

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹𝘀

In the months leading to February 28, 2026, more than ± 25 senior US generals with direct experience on Iran (and Iraq) were removed from their positions. Some retired under pressure. Some were reassigned. Some were publicly dismissed.

The pattern was consistent.

Officers who had run war-games on Iran scenarios for AT LEAST two decades, who understood the institutional resilience of the regime, who had presented friction to the war plan, were removed BEFORE the war plan was executed.

These were the people whose job was to brief senior civilian leadership on what an Iran campaign would actually cost financially, politically, economically, regionally, geopolitical, 1st, 2nd and 3rd order effects and much more.

Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth had the smartest and most experienced minds in the room forced out.

Their dismissal is not a coincidence. It is and was the precondition to war.

But you would NOT fire THAT MANY senior staff officers and Generals over a short-campaign, you wouldn't gut the institutional memory of the US Armed Forces for a "short campaign", why would anyone do that?

Anyone who served in the military knows there are consistent and sometimes frequent friction between upper brass, but they do not get mass layoff letters because of difference in tactics, strategy or thinking.

To me, this is the RED FLAG that this is NOT a short, surgical campaign and no, this was not a purge of "Biden Administration" because military officers are smart enough to know that they are apolitical and to ensure their careers last more than 4 year presidential elections. They plan and execute. That is what they get paid for.

What remained of the Generals was a circle of perhaps political loyalists and second-tier civilian appointees who had been telling Trump for ± 6 years that Iran would fold.

The same circle that authored the maximum pressure campaign in his first term. The same circle that walked the US out of the JCPOA in May 2018 on the theory that Iran would return to the table with weaker hands. The same circle that watched Iran refuse to do so and concluded the answer was MORE pressure, not less.

That circle briefed the February 28 strike. The officers who would have told them the assessment was wrong were NO LONGER in the room and this is the danger for every male 16 year old growing up in America now. If this war escalates further, as I predict, the draft will be likely to meet the war demands for man power and ground forces.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗝𝗖𝗣𝗢𝗔 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗸𝗲𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗜𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄

Here is the analytical pivot that almost nobody in Western commentary has named clearly.

The JCPOA was NOT just a nuclear deal. It was a 7-party agreement (Iran, US, UK, France, Germany, Russia, China) ratified through the United Nations Security Council via Resolution 2231.

Why?

Because Iran did NOT trust the United States to honour a bilateral agreement. Their position has not changed since and their trust has obviously decreased since...

Read that again. The Iranians INSISTED on a multilateral, UN-ratified framework precisely because they expected the US to renege. The entire architecture of the deal was Iranian Security Risk Management framework executed with perfection against American faithlessness.

In May 2018, Trump confirmed that exact suspicion.

He withdrew unilaterally from a multilateral, @UN-ratified agreement. The other parties (@EUCouncil , @KremlinRussia_E , @MFA_China ) tried to keep the deal alive.

They could NOT because of US secondary sanctions.

From the Iranian institutional memory, that single act locked in a permanent and hardwired lesson.

From their perspective, the United States cannot be trusted to honour any negotiated agreement, even one ratified by the UN Security Council. This also sends a dangerous message to the rest of the world and the post-WWII world order to everyone. Hedge your bets, because even the UN Security Council is useless against the American promise.

Bilateral negotiation with Washington is institutionally impossible from Tehran's side, NOT because Iran refuses but because the precedent has eliminated the negotiating mechanism itself.

When Trump's team in 2025 and 2026 assumed Iran would come to the table to renegotiate, they were imagining a Tehran that had not lived through 2018. The Tehran that exists today watched the US destroy the only mechanism Iran trusted, and concluded there is no mechanism left.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗰 𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻

If we stack the four facts together and the picture clarifies.

ONE. Every prior US president was briefed that Iran was uniquely difficult and stepped back.

TWO. Trump fired the senior officers who would have given him the same briefing.

THREE. The remaining circle authored the 2018 JCPOA withdrawal, which permanently broke Iran's institutional trust in any future US-negotiated agreement.

FOUR. The same circle then assumed in 2026 that Iran would negotiate after America threw all its kinetic might into the strikes, after decapitating its spiritual and political leaders, exactly the assumption their own 2018 action had made impossible.

This is the most consequential foreign policy error since Iraq 2003, possibly since Vietnam.

The strategic premise of the entire war is wrong, and the man who ordered it just admitted as much on national television. Iran is not begging. Iran is "strong and proud." Iran has "47 years of independence." Iran will NOT take the deal that the administration was certain it would take.

𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁

When a state has destroyed its own ability to negotiate AND failed to militarily defeat its adversary AND publicly committed to a strategic premise that has now visibly cracked, only two doors remain if you are honest with yourself.

Door 1: Withdraw and absorb the political cost, which Trump cannot do because the architecture of the 2025 NSS requires Iran's defeat.

Door 2: ....Or escalate and hope that more force produces the capitulation the prior force did not.

If you see another door, tell me.

Trump's "Meet the Press" admission is the diagnostic. The man knows. He admitted it in his own words. The circle around him cannot, because admitting it ends their careers, security clearances, their mortgages and life that come with being close the inner circle of the most powerful man on earth. The circle around him knows that their narrative built on the maximum pressure thesis did not work.

The war continues NOT because the strategy is working, but because the political cost of admitting-- "it is not" -- is now larger than the political cost of continuing it.

This is signal that the next 18 to 24 months will be defined by the political impossibility of withdrawal, not by the operational possibility of victory.

The map I have been building for ± 90 days fits this admission cleanly.

The Q3 2027 to Q1 2028 ground invasion window is the consequence of exactly the dynamic Trump just publicly revealed.

He does not know that he gave the game away. Iran did. You, me and Iran were watching the interview too.

Read the full analysis and more on my Substack, if you are keen to support my work, you can do it there: https://t.co/ZhKhDk22Mi

I look beyond the headlines and make sense of the nuances. If this gave you signal worth keeping, like and consider following 🙏🙏

𝗦𝗜𝗚𝗡𝗔𝗟, 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗡𝗢𝗜𝗦𝗘!!

cc: @POTUS @SecRubio @SecDef @MeetThePress @StateDept @s_m_marandi @mb_ghalibaf @marklevinshow

[Suppressed News. @SuppressedNws1]

Trump CRASHES OUT and WALKS away mid interview.

He calls U.S. elections “THIRD WORLD” and goes after CNN, ABC, CBS, and Meet The Press.

[Joe G @EastEndJoe]

Here’s what really happened.

[Follower Crazy @FollowerCrazy]

https://t.co/lG15RJvFZw

#jews

[ＴＲＵＴＨ ＮＵＫＥ ＭＥＤＩＡ @TruthNukeMediaX]

🔥The Party Song of the Summer is Here!🔥
"Low IQ Racist" by Buck Breaker

[Feed the 🦈 @feedthesharks00]

@Hand_some_truth asks Alex Jones
"Obviously there is a war on White people, would you agree? ... When is enough, enough?"

[phillip @philliplede]

Alex Jones is deeply vexed by the accusation that he is closeted; instead clarifying that he came out on air.

[Follower Crazy @FollowerCrazy]

@zogtrotter @more_amalek @Hand_some_truth It's a story about a guy who walked on water, came back from the dead, healed the blind, brought others back from the dead, and was literally God as a man. Whether there was a man called Jesus is totally irrelevant. The story is a lie.

[Follower Crazy @FollowerCrazy]

@more_amalek @Hand_some_truth I thought this was a great interview, and while I don't necessarily trust Alex generally, he did explain why he used the term globalist as opposed to Jew and other things. I don't think he's had anyone on like HT before.

[NeedMoreAmalek @more_amalek]

In this clip, @Hand_some_truth talks with Alex Jones about the contradiction of being anti-Zionist while worshiping the god of Zion & calls for an Age of Reason in the spirit of Thomas Paine.

Jones then bizarrely compares denying Jesus to denying George Washington existed.

[Heather Bleeps McKikelstein @ChinaisAsshoeFU]

Long story short (but I highly recommend everyone watch in full) the interview of @Hand_some_truth and @RealAlexJones and that photo is such a keeper for HT or as Alex called him, HITLER TIME 🤣 . So entertaining!

[Follower Crazy @FollowerCrazy]

@Awesome_Jew_ Not a stunt man, America is officially majority against Israel, and it's for very good reason. The only question is, are you gonna do it the easy way or the hard way, this time. I don't want a world war. I'm just not tolerating Jew rule, and nobody ever did.

[Michael Andrew @Disciple4Lif]

@Hand_some_truth @RealAlexJones Great Job HT!

It was a good chat. He should have you on again. Good job @RealAlexJones for having HT on. It shows you’re serious about the 1st Amendment. Alex is more based than I knew.

[Follower Crazy @FollowerCrazy]

Handsome Truth on The Alex Jones show - Full Interview https://t.co/WxBZ5y6abR

[Follower Crazy @FollowerCrazy]

@LucasGageX I been doing conspiracy videos myself for about 5 yrs now, barely got 100 regular viewers. I repeat things I hear, I'm not a professional investigative reporter, but I get it right mostly, and directionally, it's correct to say Israel did 9/11, even if the details are wrong.

[Follower Crazy @FollowerCrazy]

@LucasGageX You didn't link an article, and I don't really care. I saw more than enough evidence there was a plot. Saudi Arabia had it's borders drawn up by England which was already taken over by the Rothschilds. If it was them alone, that's the Jews.