This is why there should be no foreigners in our Parliament.
Foreigners covering up the crimes of other foreigners… Shock.
Lammy just spent the last week praising the Windrush generation (who were not invited to Britain).
He doesn’t care about us Native Brits... He only cares about fake narratives that allow migrants to stay here against our will.
This data must be released so that we can confirm what we already know to be true.
𝗕𝗜𝗚 𝗡𝗘𝗪𝗦! - 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗕𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗪𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗕𝗲 𝗔𝘁 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗚𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗙𝗮𝗶𝗿!
Taking place once again at Ragley Hall from 24-26 July, The Game Fair will be open to visitors on Friday, Saturday and Sunday next week.
If you’ve never been, this show is a real celebration of the countryside with world class displays (like Gundogs, Falconry and Terrier racing) as well as “have a go” activities such as clay pigeon shooting, archery and finishing. Coupled with the infamous ‘Gunmakers row’ and the myriad of trade stands, it makes for a great day out.
I’m very pleased to say that we will have a stand and will be located within the Land Management Section - Stand number X2254.
Come and say hello and find out what Restore Britain is doing to support British Farmers, Gamekeepers, our countryside traditions and our countryside overall.
@truegodsattend@Objectobot Well, if you're not making the claim that banks don't ascribe value to money then you've already ceded the point that in addition to being a commodity, it is also an 'exchange token', a measure of value.
@truegodsattend@Objectobot It's not? Then what are you claiming me not to know already? Contextually, it cropped up on the matter of loans, and how the bank apparently doesn't ascribe value to them?
@truegodsattend@Objectobot Money can be traded, so in that respect is a commodity. But its chief purpose is as a representation of value which the bearer has at their disposal to exchange for value.
@truegodsattend@Objectobot On this, I'm not making a claim; I'm doing an internal critique of your position that banks don't regard money as having value.
@truegodsattend@Objectobot And not at all a mechanism of a laissez-faire market, but a market in which centralized banking determines monetary policy, and does so entirely to its own advantage, unchecked by the pressures of merit.
@truegodsattend@Objectobot Which would suggest that the money has no value to the bank; but that would seem to contain a contradiction that must be reconciled with the fact that banks do apparently regard money to have value of some description.
@truegodsattend@Objectobot Even if the purpose of the interest is to reward the risk the bank takes in lending capital, and to account for the time value of money for the period between when it is loaned and when it is repaid?
@truegodsattend@Objectobot Right, so are you making a value distinction between hard currency and virtual currency?
And which would a proposed credit authority utilize? One, or the other? Both? Neither?
@truegodsattend@Objectobot Again, there's nothing "utopian" about it. People still transact in kind.
You can put "natural" in scare quotes all you like, it doesn't change the fact that at the core of it all is the voluntary exchange of value between consenting parties.
@truegodsattend@Objectobot Trade in kind would constitute a form of market economy. Value for value. You say there is no "natural" market economy right after identifying one.
@truegodsattend@Objectobot Quite well, I'd imagine, what with money being merely a representation of value exchange. As a thought experiment, perhaps substitute it for something like, say, salt?
@truegodsattend@Objectobot Money's not scarce. If anything it's been overprinted, to inflationary consequence.
Groundless? Hardly. If your money comes from the public purse and not private profit, then it's a spigot that's liable to be turned on and never again turned off.