‘Jaw-dropping’ Study Finds Vaccinated Children Have 170% Higher Risk of Autism
The peer-reviewed study also found that vaccinated children had a 212% greater likelihood of developing other neurodevelopmental disorders, including ADHD, epilepsy/seizures, brain inflammation and tic and learning disorders.
https://t.co/y2Hy63X13L
The term #VAIDS is crossing the Overton window it seems. If you have been following me for over 2 years you knew it was presenting in the Bureau of Labor Statistics absence and work time lost data in both the UK & US with a 12 sigma signal.
Looks guys they knew and they fucking ignored it.
Immune systems are blown up.
Greatest cover up ever and it continues!
DISTURBING: Yale researchers have found that some COVID jab recipients show signs of a depleted immune system and continue producing spike proteins years after the shot.
“This is bad news. Very bad.”
What was once called a “conspiracy theory” is now backed by science: vaccine spike proteins can linger in the body for years, potentially causing chronic inflammation and long-term health problems.
Even more alarming, some patients experienced Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) reactivation, while others had dangerously low levels of vital immune cells.
The COVID jabs were sold to us as the solution to “end the pandemic.” Instead, it looks like they wrecked the immune system and made things worse.
Video via @ElijahSchaffer
BREAKING - Peer-Reviewed Study Confirms mRNA Injections Cross the Placenta and Reach the Fetus in a Mouse Model
Moderna should had done this research years ago to understand fetal toxicity of their product. Pregnant women and women of childbearing potential should have been excluded from mRNA injection. Intramuscular mRNA-1273 injection rapidly crosses the placenta within one hour, accumulates in fetal organs, translates into Spike protein, and persists in fetal tissues after birth. @moderna_tx@McCulloughFund https://t.co/lWgZAMYdII
What a despicable organization Media Matters is. Complete misrepresentation.
RFK made clear he wants world class infectious disease protocols.
But 92% of American death are chronic disease.
RFK wants to solve that - which anyone who cares about children’s health should agree w.
Two million views in seven hours. People are worried, and they’re right to be.
If I’d taken the jabs (I didn’t) and had a nasty reaction - even years ago - and now had a flu (for example) that I couldn’t shake… I’d want answers.
In 12/2021, nearly 300 colleges announced students needed a C19 booster to return to classes in 1/2022.
Remember when @DrPaulOffit said they didn’t need another shot and advised his 20 year old son not to take a 3rd shot but did NOTHING to stop the roll out of these policies even @Penn where he is a faculty member?
Never Forget!
As chairman of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, my top priority will be uncovering the corruption of these federal health agencies.
How many lies did Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins tell the American public? I intend to expose the full truth.
In this thread I'll respond to some of what I've seen out there. Let's start with Niall:
1) On the general background, yes, you have been more right than wrong on a lot of the details of the conflict. Which is why I'm surprised to hear you call the administration's posture "appeasement." We are negotiating to end the conflict. It is "appeasement" only if you think the Ukrainians have a credible pathway to victory. They don't, so it's not.
2) As far as I can tell, accusations of "appeasement" hinge on a few arguments (not all of them from Niall, to be clear). The first is a criticism that we're even talking to the Russians. Well, the President believes to conduct diplomacy, you actually have to speak to people. This used to be called statesmanship. Second, the idea--based often on fake media reports--that we've "given the Russians everything they want." Third, that if we just passed another aid package, Ukraine would roll all the way to Moscow, raise Navalny from the dead, and install a democratic and free leader to Russia (I exaggerate, but only a little). All of these arguments are provably, demonstrably false.
Many people who have gotten everything wrong about Russia say they know what Russia wants. Many people who know the media reports fake garbage take anonymously sourced reports on a complex negotiation as gospel truth.
But the bigger issue, as I think Niall knows, is that most of those loudly shouting "appeasement" are people who aren't dealing with the reality on the ground.
3) On the specifics of the negotiation, I"m not confirming details publicly for obvious reasons, but much of what I've seen leaked ranges from entirely bogus to missing critical info. The president has set goals for the negotiation, and I am biased, but I think he's awfully good at this. But we're not going to telegraph our negotiating posture to make people feel better. The president is trying to achieve a lasting piece, not massage the egos or anxieties of people waving Ukraine flags.
The idea that the President of the United States has to start the negotiation by saying "maybe we'll let Ukraine into NATO" defies all common sense. Again, it's not appeasement to acknowledge the realities on the ground--realities President Trump has pointed to for years in some cases.
4) Many of the subjective criticisms amount to pearl clutching that don't ultimately matter. I'm happy to defend POTUS's criticisms of the Ukrainian leadership (not that it matters, because he's the president, but I agree with him). You're welcome to disagree. But these critiques of POTUS don't bear on the war or on his negotiation to end it.
Soon as Trump opened dialogue with Russia and began fulfilling his campaign promise to end the war in Ukraine, Democrats, their neocon allies and their media outlets catapulted themselves back to peak Russiagate hysteria and conspiracies.
They’re addicts to this derangement:
Dr. Paul Offit is a super spreader of misinformation.
It’s a slanderous lie to say RFK doesn’t care about children’s health.
Why is Dr. Offit on government advisory boards when he makes millions from pharma companies who have settled criminal penalties?
Means continued to hammer the medical industry, exposing how it “doesn’t make money when children are healthy.”
“Pharma doesn’t make money when children are healthy. The hospitals don’t make money when the beds are empty. Chronic disease, just as a demonstrable statement of economic fact, is a great economic invention for the healthcare industry, which demonstrably makes money when patients are sick,” Means said.
Visibly frustrated as @CalleyMeans dismantled the narrative CNN wanted to push, Pamela Brown began frantically cutting him off before abruptly ending the segment, calling it a “spirited discussion.”
The next disaster for CNN unfolded when host Pamela Brown asked @CalleyMeans a vaccination question that completely backfired.
Means flipped the script, using her question to highlight how the media obsesses over “measles” instead of focusing on health concerns that truly matter.
PAMELA BROWN: “Is now a time to promote vaccines... especially among children who are being impacted by measles in places like Texas and in these six states where, according to health officials, they are unvaccinated?"
CALLEY MEANS: “Pamela, with respect, why aren’t you asking me about the fact that 50% of teens have obesity? There are breathless segments being run and seen on [infectious disease] day after day after day, Pamela. It’s breathless coverage of five measles cases.
“Why aren’t we asking why 16% of COVID deaths worldwide were Americans when we’re only 4% of the world population? Because the CDC said our immune system—no, it is related, Pamela. And let me say why: because the entire coverage of Bobby Kennedy is around measles.
“The Democrats said the word ‘measles’ 25 times in the first hearing and said the words ‘obesity,’ ‘diabetes,’ and ‘chronic disease’ zero times. The HHS priority document under President Biden said the word ‘equity’ 25 times, said the word ‘vaccines’ countless times, and did not say the word ‘obesity’ or ‘diabetes.’
“There is a problem right now because this is not zero-sum. We are focused on a very small subset that’s important—we need good infectious disease management. Bobby Kennedy, Dr. Offit, is not correct. Bobby Kennedy has said one thing about vaccines and one thing only: that they should be studied like any other product.
“Dr. Offit, on the ACIP committee, has recommended vaccines that have ended up being recalled for causing mass issues to kids. Bobby Kennedy has written multiple books, not about being anti-vax, but about having good science. And Dr. Offit is calling him anti-vaccine for literally just saying we need studies.
“Bobby Kennedy is not concerned with measles. He wants good policies with measles. He wants to attack the 92% of deaths in the United States, which is chronic conditions,” Means said.
But Means later questioned:
“Is it appropriate for a member of a government advisory committee (ACIP) to have a $1.5 million salary paid by Merck and receive millions in pharma royalties while he’s issuing guidance on products those companies make?”
https://t.co/uSf5aMFZoL
Calley Means (@CalleyMeans), ex-pharma consultant turned industry critic, came out swinging on CNN Wednesday in a fiery debate against infamous vaccine pusher Dr. Paul Offit.
Offit thought he could call RFK Jr. an anti-vaxxer without his own financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry being exposed—but he was wrong.
Things immediately got heated when Means exposed Offit’s shocking conflicts of interest on live TV while CNN’s Pamela Brown stood by and let it happen like a deer caught in headlights.
“What’s causing distrust in public health authorities is conflicts of interest, like Dr. Offit taking millions of dollars from pharmaceutical makers like Merck while approving and recommending pharmaceuticals on ACIP committees.
“Dr. Offit says that science is always settled when he himself has approved vaccines that have been recalled for causing organ failure in kids.
“Dr. Offit is talking about measles… But there were 300 deaths from measles a year before the invention of the vaccine. We have 38% of children right now with prediabetes. Bobby is focused on that. He’s focused on reorganizing the department. And that’s what we should be talking about, not this distraction,” Means argued.
NEW: Dr. Deborah Birx admits the COVID shots were pushed on the wrong people, saying the rollout on young people ignored the science.
Now, she tells us.
“The messenger RNA vaccine should have been rolled out for the people that were at risk for severe disease because that’s what the vaccine was developed for,” Birx said.
She also confessed the COVID shot was never “designed” to prevent infection:
“That is not what the COVID vaccine was designed to do. It wasn’t designed against infection.”
People lost their jobs under the lie that no one was safe until everyone was vaccinated.
Now, four years later, they admit young people never really needed it—and it wasn’t even designed to prevent infection.